Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 123 (8764 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 06-28-2017 8:15 AM
384 online now:
CRR, Faith, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Pressie, RAZD, Riggamortis (7 members, 377 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: superuniverse
Upcoming Birthdays: ooh-child
Post Volume:
Total: 812,302 Year: 16,908/21,208 Month: 2,797/3,593 Week: 264/646 Day: 27/115 Hour: 1/7

Announcements: Reporting debate problems OR discussing moderation actions/inactions


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   'Eurachondra is 'Missing LINK'.
Davidjay
Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 1 of 6 (808883)
05-14-2017 10:40 AM


After reseaching HERE, it seems that many evolutionists deem 'Eurachondra' as our ancestors.

https://blogs.scientificamerican.com/...ucing-the-treeshrews

And yet dont seem to acknowledge this great BREAKTHROUGH in science from their standpoint or according to their theory.

For its these tree shrews, that would be our MISSING LINK that connects us to the past. Forget a MISSING LINK within primates, but the missing link previous in our supposed human branching of the past til today, that connects us to all the other animals.

So lets allow evolutionists to have their moment in the Sun, and ask them about this great missing link connection that they say is scientific.

For bats are our cousins and apparrently not our ancestors, so lets consider treeshews. and our MISSING LINKS to our origins

Sincerely Yours

David


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 05-14-2017 6:00 PM Davidjay has responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12516
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


(4)
Message 2 of 6 (808904)
05-14-2017 6:00 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Davidjay
05-14-2017 10:40 AM


The Scientific American article seems to be saying that treeshrews and primates share a common ancestor, not that primates are descended from treeshrews. It might be interesting to have a discussion about what the article actually says, but you don't actually engage in discussion and so I won't be promoting this thread.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Davidjay, posted 05-14-2017 10:40 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by Davidjay, posted 05-15-2017 8:12 AM Admin has responded

  
Davidjay
Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 3 of 6 (808950)
05-15-2017 8:12 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by Admin
05-14-2017 6:00 PM


Lets discuss what all or most evolutionists HERE say is our ancestor..
Percy, its not one article I am talking about, its what all the evolutionists HERE finally admitted was the ancestry of human beings. They all pointed toward the treeshrew as their common ancestor. Why not allow evolutionists the chance to discuss and explain their reasoning, and why ALL of evolution points to treeshews as our common ancestor. Why the fear, why predetermine the outcome of a discussion. Lets openly talk about what the conclusion of evolutionary studies have come up with.

.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by Admin, posted 05-14-2017 6:00 PM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by Admin, posted 05-16-2017 7:44 AM Davidjay has responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12516
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 4 of 6 (809072)
05-16-2017 7:44 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by Davidjay
05-15-2017 8:12 AM


Re: Lets discuss what all or most evolutionists HERE say is our ancestor..
As I said, Davidjay, you don't actually engage in discussion and so I won't be promoting your thread. Demonstrate an ability to engage in discussion on open threads and then I will consider promoting your threads.

--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by Davidjay, posted 05-15-2017 8:12 AM Davidjay has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Davidjay, posted 05-16-2017 10:01 AM Admin has responded

  
Davidjay
Member
Posts: 1026
From: B.C Canada
Joined: 11-05-2004
Member Rating: 1.0


Message 5 of 6 (809089)
05-16-2017 10:01 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by Admin
05-16-2017 7:44 AM


Re: Why protect evolutionists ?
I always engage in discussions and always prove my points. But evolutionists want me to agree with their false science and false givens.

They never answer and get very angry as mentioned when faced with opposition or just faced with questions. Hence they try and stop discussions, as it goes against their supposed theory.

In an open debate, BOTH sides are required to answer questions and BOTH sides are required to stay under control, and debate honestly and intelligently.

The MISSING LINK is basic for the proof of evolution. Creationists have no missing links and a direct lineage back to our forefathers who were humans. Why protect evolutionists from answering queries about their theory, and their missing link to us primates... why cant we ask about tree shrews as they have said that tree shrews are our ancestors.

Why protect them from their outrageous, downright silly origin statement. If it isnt silly, let them explain.

Why protect evolutionists ?


.
The Lord is the GREAT SCIENTIST as He created SCIENCE and ALL LAWS and ALL MATTER and of course ALL LIFE. God is the Great Architect, Designer and Mathematician. Evolutioon is not mathematical and says there is no DESIGN but that all things came about by sheer LUCK.

.


This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by Admin, posted 05-16-2017 7:44 AM Admin has responded

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by Admin, posted 05-16-2017 1:49 PM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12516
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.9


Message 6 of 6 (809164)
05-16-2017 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 5 by Davidjay
05-16-2017 10:01 AM


Re: Why protect evolutionists ?
Davidjay writes:

why cant we ask about tree shrews as they have said that tree shrews are our ancestors.

What, again? Repeating false statements over and over again is how you're going to engage in discussion? Consider yourself lucky I don't double your suspension.

Closing this down.


--Percy
EvC Forum Director

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Davidjay, posted 05-16-2017 10:01 AM Davidjay has not yet responded

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2017