Understanding through Discussion


Welcome! You are not logged in. [ Login ]
EvC Forum active members: 83 (8872 total)
Current session began: 
Page Loaded: 11-16-2018 5:07 PM
220 online now:
DrJones*, dwise1, PaulK, Percy (Admin), Phat (AdminPhat), Tangle, Tanypteryx (7 members, 213 visitors)
Chatting now:  Chat room empty
Newest Member: Son of Man
Post Volume:
Total: 842,085 Year: 16,908/29,783 Month: 896/1,956 Week: 399/331 Day: 58/69 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism
Astronomy
Junior Member
Posts: 25
Joined: 05-13-2018


Message 1 of 2 (832973)
05-15-2018 2:48 PM


DEFINITION
Darwinian Evolution (Darwinism) is the inconsistent and unfair following the principle: laws of energy-momentum conservation (as well as all other conservations) are always valid. Even in the Virtual Big Bang. However this road leads to self-denial and lies: “Science v s God Its The Collapse Of Physics As We Know it” www.dailymotion.com/video/x2jbd7x
"Michio Kaku - The Universe Shouldn't Exist"
https://youtu.be/esPXpagkVwY
However nihilism (the atheism is its expression) is not the announced "absence of Absolute Truth", but simply the "art to lie without a shame".

DEFINITON
Creation Science (or simply Creationism) is the freedom from unfair and blind demand to follow the conservation laws in physics.

DEFINITION
The Nature is what Standard Instruments do measure (at least in principle), and Instruments are what measure the Nature. Shortly: “Time is what the clock shows” (Albert Einstein). This way the definition of Nature became free from our body-senses.

DEFINITION
Spirituality, and divinity – is what can not be measured by Standard Instruments. For example: your love to mom has no physical temperature, has no physical pressure. So, spirituality is not part of the Nature. Spirituality is not natural.

THEOREM
Actions of spiritual beings always violate the conservation laws of Nature.
PROOF: spiritual being is not part of Nature.

However, the behaviour of Nature under the influence of spiritual beings is describable
by addition several terms (functions and fields) into the equations of Nature. For example, the Newton Second Law a m = F (the m is mass of body, the a is acceleration of body, F is physical force acting on body) can fully describe the levitation and telekinesis by addition of the force-field K (with no natural source). So, a m = F + K.

The proof, that without the spiritual terms (like K) the mathematics of Academic Science is not self-consistent: https://www.researchgate.net/...y-momentum_conservation_Laws
There can not be divine-less model of Nature. The spiritual beings and God are necessary.


  
AdminModulous
Administrator (Idle past 55 days)
Posts: 897
Joined: 03-02-2006


Message 2 of 2 (832984)
05-15-2018 5:45 PM


Thread Copied to Is It Science? Forum
Thread copied to the The roots of Creation Science and Darwinism thread in the Is It Science? forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.
  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2015 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.0 Beta
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2018