The link doesn't work.
Please update your opening post to make it clearer what you are saying. Since you now say they are not identical. You now appear to be saying the same species. Please clarify in great detail.
When you say, answer your own questions, it defeats the whole purpose. And besides, as I mentioned above, I ask questions both to learn, and to see if they are answerable.
Then what is the purpose? I explained to you why it would be useful for you to give what you think the answers are. It is apparent from your words that you know so little you should do some simple research on just what evolution is.
I will, perhaps, release this thread but only after you've done enough work to justify others writing an ABC text book of evolutionary thoery to you since that is what you are asking.
Advance-Adapt-Evolve-Leap Forward-Become the next link-become better than before-so on... Does that answer your question?
No it simple repeats (in more words) what you said before. How do you recognize "better"? What is "forward"? These are all just another way of saying advance.
I am asking you to think about this because it is part of your extreme lack of understanding.
A universal species. My question was if there is such a thing possible according to evolution. In other words, is there a peak of evolution where a species can only get so adapted? Is there a limit to how far a species could "evolve"?
The real answers to this have been recently given in another thread discussing limits to evolution and artificial selection.
However, you are asking the question incorrectly. You don't want to know about a single species but all descendant species.
This question will be answered in great detail when this thread is release.
This message has been edited by AdminNosy, 01-25-2005 20:35 AM