Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9161 total)
0 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,585 Year: 2,842/9,624 Month: 687/1,588 Week: 93/229 Day: 4/61 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Where does the gravity go?
Rrhain
Member
Posts: 6351
From: San Diego, CA, USA
Joined: 05-03-2003


Message 1 of 49 (188658)
02-26-2005 5:45 AM


I'm not sure if this is appropriate for Big Bang/Cosmology, so I'll let the moderators decide:
Gravity is a property of mass and mass can be converted into energy. When this happens, where does the gravity go? Does it just stop? I'm trying to remember if this is part of the experiments regarding gravitational waves but my physics is fleeing from me and I don't quite know how to express is formally to go look it up.
I'm thinking it does just go away, but I'm wondering if there is a better physicist than I am who would know for certain. Since gravity is so weak, I doubt it could be felt on any sort of common level, but I'm still curious.

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-26-2005 12:28 PM Rrhain has not replied
 Message 4 by JonF, posted 02-26-2005 9:06 PM Rrhain has not replied

  
Admin
Director
Posts: 12993
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 2.1


Message 2 of 49 (188688)
02-26-2005 11:34 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3918 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 3 of 49 (188707)
02-26-2005 12:28 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
02-26-2005 5:45 AM


well. gravitation is the acceleration of objects (b) along the bend created in space by other objects (a). remember that weird episode of the simpsons when homer turns comput0red and there's that big green grid? well when an object (a) sits upon that grid it weighs it down a bit and the grid dips under it. if an object (b) is passing by it will either be drawn into the dip or will at least alter it's course a bit due to the edge. but if an object (b) is moving fast enough, it's course alteration will be so slight it won't matter. but this alteration is always calculable... sometimes it just takes a while. mmm math.
but. (back to the actual question). in order for the gravitation to affect an object (b), that object (b) has to have mass. if the mass disappears, then the object (b) will not be affected. the exception in this is of course light. light is energy, but it has the peculiar property of behaving like particles. weird light.
but think about it. does heat bend? no. it radiates out from it's source and causes every particle it touches to become more excited.
This message has been edited by brennakimi, 02-26-2005 12:30 AM
This message has been edited by brennakimi, 02-26-2005 12:32 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 02-26-2005 5:45 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 8 by Phat, posted 02-27-2005 9:33 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 158 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 4 of 49 (188801)
02-26-2005 9:06 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Rrhain
02-26-2005 5:45 AM


I bet Eta could explain this better than I ...
Energy is mass is energy is mass. There's a point of view in which any distinction between energy and mass is an artifact of our inadequate senses, and e = mc2 is not a mere equation (stating that two different things are quivalent) but rather an identity (saying that two apparently different things are really identical and indistinguishable).
But, assuming that "converting mass to energy" does actually have some meaning, the gravity doesn't go away. The energy has the same gravity that the mass did.
Many of us are familiar with the precession of Mercury's orbit and the fact that relativity accounts for it better than Newtonian mechanics. I've seen it stated that one way of looking at this is that the Sun's gravitational field contains energy and therefore generates a gravitational field, which in turn generates a gravitational field, which in turn ... and so on in an infinite but, thank goodness, converging series. This "extra" gravity causes the extra precession of Mercury's orbit. I really don't know if the math truly bears that out, but it's a heckuva story.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Rrhain, posted 02-26-2005 5:45 AM Rrhain has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by Coragyps, posted 02-26-2005 9:48 PM JonF has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 725 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 5 of 49 (188809)
02-26-2005 9:48 PM
Reply to: Message 4 by JonF
02-26-2005 9:06 PM


Way out of my depth here....but when a supernova pops, how much mass gets converted to energy? 10^51 ergs, do I recall, which is equivalent to 10^30 grams of stuff? Or is a lot of that gravitational potential energy getting converted to neutrinos, etc.?
What I'm driving at is, whence come the gravitational waves that we're seeking when a supernova blows? From the "disappearence" of mass or from something more subtle, like what you're suggesting?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by JonF, posted 02-26-2005 9:06 PM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 7 by JonF, posted 02-27-2005 9:24 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Eta_Carinae
Member (Idle past 4365 days)
Posts: 547
From: US
Joined: 11-15-2003


Message 6 of 49 (188834)
02-27-2005 1:17 AM


JonF has it right
if you remember from GR the source of gravity is not just mass but the total of mass and energy as summarised by the stress energy tensor T(mu,nu).
For instance a hot brick has a little more gravitational pull than a cold brick since its total mass + energy has increased from when it was cold.
When a supernova goes bang a lot of energy goes into neutrinos which freely stream away taking energy (mass equivalent with them.) Note that only a small percentage of the star is converted to energy. 10^51 ergs is about 10^30 grams of mass equivalent. That is only about 1/2000 th of the mass of the Sun.

Replies to this message:
 Message 18 by JustinC, posted 02-28-2005 9:30 AM Eta_Carinae has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 158 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 7 of 49 (188876)
02-27-2005 9:24 AM
Reply to: Message 5 by Coragyps
02-26-2005 9:48 PM


Geez, I know that I replied last night, but it seems to have vaporized.
G-waves are caused by accelerating mass, analogous to electromagnetic waves caused by accelerating charge. Neutron stars orbiting their common center of mass, asymmetric fast-rotating supernova remnants, and what-not. Jillian's Guide to Gravitational Waves.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 5 by Coragyps, posted 02-26-2005 9:48 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Phat
Member
Posts: 18248
From: Denver,Colorado USA
Joined: 12-30-2003
Member Rating: 1.1


Message 8 of 49 (188877)
02-27-2005 9:33 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by macaroniandcheese
02-26-2005 12:28 PM


Questions, questions, questions!
brennakimi writes:
does heat bend? no. it radiates out from it's source and causes every particle it touches to become more excited.
Is heat affected by gravity?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-26-2005 12:28 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by JonF, posted 02-27-2005 10:57 AM Phat has not replied
 Message 14 by NosyNed, posted 02-27-2005 11:48 PM Phat has not replied

  
JonF
Member (Idle past 158 days)
Posts: 6174
Joined: 06-23-2003


Message 9 of 49 (188886)
02-27-2005 10:57 AM
Reply to: Message 8 by Phat
02-27-2005 9:33 AM


Re: Questions, questions, questions!
Is heat affected by gravity?
Radiational heat is energy, is therefore mass, and therefore has and is affected by gravity.
Conduction and convection heat is energy added to material things, and therefore adds to their mass, gravity, and the effect of gravity on them.
Don't bet on measuring it!

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Phat, posted 02-27-2005 9:33 AM Phat has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by custard, posted 02-27-2005 8:40 PM JonF has not replied
 Message 11 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-27-2005 11:14 PM JonF has replied

  
custard
Inactive Member


Message 10 of 49 (189028)
02-27-2005 8:40 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by JonF
02-27-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Questions, questions, questions!
jonf writes:
Radiational heat is energy, is therefore mass, and therefore has and is affected by gravity.
Heat has mass? I'll be a monkey's uncle.
See, this is why creos, and most other folks, believe in the supernatural: it's almost as easy to believe my dead aunt made that vase fall over last night than it is to believe that heat has mass.
Especially after watching Patrick Swayze do that thing with the penny in Ghost.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by JonF, posted 02-27-2005 10:57 AM JonF has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by NosyNed, posted 02-27-2005 11:46 PM custard has not replied
 Message 17 by Phat, posted 02-28-2005 9:13 AM custard has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3918 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 11 of 49 (189072)
02-27-2005 11:14 PM
Reply to: Message 9 by JonF
02-27-2005 10:57 AM


Re: Questions, questions, questions!
i thought energy and mass were proportional. thus wouldn't pure energy have no mass?
*edit*
i'm going to leave this here because i just realized that i'm confused. but. as velocity approaches the speed of light, mass drops to zero... is this not a demonstration of energy?
This message has been edited by brennakimi, 02-27-2005 23:19 AM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 9 by JonF, posted 02-27-2005 10:57 AM JonF has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by NosyNed, posted 02-27-2005 11:44 PM macaroniandcheese has replied
 Message 20 by JonF, posted 02-28-2005 10:06 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 12 of 49 (189080)
02-27-2005 11:44 PM
Reply to: Message 11 by macaroniandcheese
02-27-2005 11:14 PM


Mass to Zero!??
i'm going to leave this here because i just realized that i'm confused. but. as velocity approaches the speed of light, mass drops to zero... is this not a demonstration of energy?
You are, indeed, confused. The intertial mass of an object goes up as it speeds up. To infinity (but not beyond) as it approaches the speed of light.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-27-2005 11:14 PM macaroniandcheese has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 16 by macaroniandcheese, posted 02-28-2005 9:03 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 13 of 49 (189081)
02-27-2005 11:46 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by custard
02-27-2005 8:40 PM


Heat has mass.
Remember that light is "bent" in a gravitational field.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by custard, posted 02-27-2005 8:40 PM custard has not replied

  
NosyNed
Member
Posts: 8996
From: Canada
Joined: 04-04-2003


Message 14 of 49 (189082)
02-27-2005 11:48 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by Phat
02-27-2005 9:33 AM


Heat affected by gravity
If you take heat as infra red radiation (which it was used as somewhere else ) then yes for sure.
Now if it isn't in the form of IR photons then it is less clear to me but I don't see how that conclusion can be avoided. E does, after all, equal mc**2.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by Phat, posted 02-27-2005 9:33 AM Phat has not replied

  
Buzsaw
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 49 (189084)
02-27-2005 11:59 PM


Gravity is God's glue that holds his universe together.

In Jehovah God's Universe; time, energy and boundless space had no beginning and will have no ending. The universe, by and through him, is, has always been and forever will be intelligently designed, changed and managed by his providence. buzsaw

Replies to this message:
 Message 48 by Wounded King, posted 06-01-2005 6:27 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024