Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,425 Year: 3,682/9,624 Month: 553/974 Week: 166/276 Day: 6/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Quick question on carbon dating
Jonathan
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 6 (14353)
07-28-2002 11:54 PM


Please excuse my ignorance but I am somewhat confused on how this works. I understand that carbon decays at a specific rate and this ammount of decay is measured to give a date. Right?
How is it that two objects can have a different "age" if the same matter that is in them has been around since the beginning of time or the big bang? Is the carbon created at different times?
For instince I have a chicken bone that is only 1 year old but, the carbon that is in the bone should be as old as the earth. Wouldnt it? Shouldnt everything have the exact same age? Sorry for the dumb question I just dont understand.

Replies to this message:
 Message 2 by John, posted 07-29-2002 12:06 AM Jonathan has not replied
 Message 6 by gene90, posted 08-02-2002 12:50 PM Jonathan has not replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 2 of 6 (14357)
07-29-2002 12:06 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jonathan
07-28-2002 11:54 PM


quote:
Originally posted by Jonathan:
Please excuse my ignorance but I am somewhat confused on how this works. I understand that carbon decays at a specific rate and this ammount of decay is measured to give a date. Right?
How is it that two objects can have a different "age" if the same matter that is in them has been around since the beginning of time or the big bang? Is the carbon created at different times?
For instince I have a chicken bone that is only 1 year old but, the carbon that is in the bone should be as old as the earth. Wouldnt it? Shouldnt everything have the exact same age? Sorry for the dumb question I just dont understand.

There are three major variants-- isotopes-- of carbon. Carbon-14 is unstable. That is it slowly decays via radiation. Carbon-12 and Carbon-13 are stable. Carbon-14 is created at a (somewhat) constant rate in the upper atmosphere. As living organisms do what they do they absorb the various carbon isotopes in amounts proportional to the proportions in the atmosphere. When an organism dies, it stops absorbing carbon. This is when the clock starts. As time passes the proportions of the various carbons change as C-14 decays. That change give us a means of dating the death of the organism. C-14 only works on organic remains and care has to be taken to avoid contaminations, etc.
The following link will give you more detail on C-14 ( and other radio-decay based dating methods as well).
No webpage found at provided URL: http://my.erinet.com/~jwoolf/rad_dat.html
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jonathan, posted 07-28-2002 11:54 PM Jonathan has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 3 by nator, posted 08-01-2002 12:17 AM John has replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 3 of 6 (14611)
08-01-2002 12:17 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by John
07-29-2002 12:06 AM


It should also be mentioned that Carbon 14 dating only works for things tens of thousands of years old.
Really old things use other methods.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by John, posted 07-29-2002 12:06 AM John has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by John, posted 08-02-2002 1:26 AM nator has replied

  
John
Inactive Member


Message 4 of 6 (14710)
08-02-2002 1:26 AM
Reply to: Message 3 by nator
08-01-2002 12:17 AM


quote:
Originally posted by schrafinator:
It should also be mentioned that Carbon 14 dating only works for things tens of thousands of years old.
Really old things use other methods.

Really young things don't work either. Recent events-- nuclear testing-- have skewed the ratios of c14 toward the high concentrations. And fossil fuel burning starting a couple hundred years ago has dumped a lot of old carbon into the atmosphere. This latter effect is pretty minimal I believe.
------------------
http://www.hells-handmaiden.com

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by nator, posted 08-01-2002 12:17 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 5 by nator, posted 08-02-2002 9:50 AM John has not replied

  
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 5 of 6 (14731)
08-02-2002 9:50 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by John
08-02-2002 1:26 AM


That is good to know, thanks.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by John, posted 08-02-2002 1:26 AM John has not replied

  
gene90
Member (Idle past 3844 days)
Posts: 1610
Joined: 12-25-2000


Message 6 of 6 (14751)
08-02-2002 12:50 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by Jonathan
07-28-2002 11:54 PM


[QUOTE][B]How is it that two objects can have a different "age" if the same matter that is in them has been around since the beginning of time or the big bang?[/QUOTE]
[/B]
The matter that is in the object is thought to have been around since the beginning. The atoms may not have been.
[QUOTE][B]Is the carbon created at different times?[/QUOTE]
[/B]
Yes, it is. 14C is being generated in the atmosphere of Earth when a particular isotope of Nitrogen is bombarded by alpha particle radiation and undergoes a nuclear reaction. Since the rate of production is fairly constant we can extrapolate how old something is, or more to the point, how much time has elapsed since the organism died (and 14C was no longer being added to its body).
Some of the posts above mention complications with carbon dating. One that they haven't mentioned yet is that it is useless with sea shells or marine life that accrete carbon from an aquatic environment, because the major source of dissolved carbon for water is from the geologic environment, so nearly all the carbon used there is millions of years old. It also becomes useless above 40,000 years of sample age because the existing 14C on such old materials is too low to measure. Also carbon dating cannot be used on true fossils because the organic material has been replaced with minerals. So 14C is commonly used in archeaology and anthropology but rarely used in paleontology.
[QUOTE][B]Sorry for the dumb question I just dont understand.[/QUOTE]
[/B]
I ask questions, I don't mind answering questions, and I encourage other people to ask as many as they like. After all, the best part of the debate is learning.
[This message has been edited by gene90, 08-02-2002]

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Jonathan, posted 07-28-2002 11:54 PM Jonathan has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024