[QUOTE][B]How is it that two objects can have a different "age" if the same matter that is in them has been around since the beginning of time or the big bang?[/QUOTE]
[/B]
The matter that is in the object is thought to have been around since the beginning. The atoms may not have been.
[QUOTE][B]Is the carbon created at different times?[/QUOTE]
[/B]
Yes, it is.
14C is being generated in the atmosphere of Earth when a particular isotope of Nitrogen is bombarded by alpha particle radiation and undergoes a nuclear reaction. Since the rate of production is fairly constant we can extrapolate how old something is, or more to the point, how much time has elapsed since the organism died (and 14C was no longer being added to its body).
Some of the posts above mention complications with carbon dating. One that they haven't mentioned yet is that it is useless with sea shells or marine life that accrete carbon from an aquatic environment, because the major source of dissolved carbon for water is from the geologic environment, so nearly all the carbon used there is millions of years old. It also becomes useless above 40,000 years of sample age because the existing 14C on such old materials is too low to measure. Also carbon dating cannot be used on true fossils because the organic material has been replaced with minerals. So 14C is commonly used in archeaology and anthropology but rarely used in paleontology.
[QUOTE][B]Sorry for the dumb question I just dont understand.[/QUOTE]
[/B]
I ask questions, I don't mind answering questions, and I encourage other people to ask as many as they like. After all, the best part of the debate is learning.
[This message has been edited by gene90, 08-02-2002]