I was watching a video sent to me by a Creationist on YouTube
Hugh Ross as many of you know is a Old Earth Creationist. He accepts the big bang and the age of the earth/universe but not biological evolution. Can someone with more academia than I help me understand the flaws in this? I know a lot of Hughs arguments against evolution (and abiogenesis) are basically fine tuning fallacies and complexity arguments as well as downright rejection of genetic evidence that supports similarity of species as well. But I could use some help with this one.