Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,332 Year: 3,589/9,624 Month: 460/974 Week: 73/276 Day: 1/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Infinity
tudwell
Member (Idle past 5997 days)
Posts: 172
From: KCMO
Joined: 08-20-2006


Message 1 of 2 (389883)
03-16-2007 12:36 PM


I was recently reading The Restaurant at the End of the Universe by Douglas Adams, and in it I found the following passage:
Douglas Adams writes:
It is known that there are an infinite number of worlds, simply because there is an infinite amount of space for them to be in. However, not every one of them is inhabited. Therefore, there must be a finite number of inhabited worlds.
Now let's assume for the sake of argument that the first two sentences are correct. Is the conclusion Adams draws from these two statements correct?
For simplicity, let's say there is only one uninhabited planet. That follows the premises, right? So all but one of the infinite worlds in the universe are inhabited. My question is: Is the number of inhabited worlds finite or infinite?
It seems to me it must be infinite. If it's a finite number, then adding the one uninhabited planet to find the total number of planets would render a finite number, which is impossible given the premise of an infinite number of worlds.
So who's right? Me or Douglas Adams?
Big Bang and Cosmology? Coffee House? Somewhere else?

Admin
Director
Posts: 13013
From: EvC Forum
Joined: 06-14-2002
Member Rating: 1.9


Message 2 of 2 (390195)
03-19-2007 10:09 AM


Thread copied to the On Infinity thread in the Big Bang and Cosmology forum, this copy of the thread has been closed.

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024