Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,849 Year: 4,106/9,624 Month: 977/974 Week: 304/286 Day: 25/40 Hour: 3/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The New Pearl Harbor
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 2 of 52 (223295)
07-12-2005 1:20 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by NosyNed
07-12-2005 12:55 AM


He suggests that the buildings were blasted to bring them down that the planes could not do it. One thing that he makes a big 'mystery' out of is the 2nd building hit being the 1st to fall.
classic, classic conspiracy theory. i've been hearing that for years. we know what caused the towers to fall, and the architect feels really really guilty. there's no mystery involved.
i saw, with a large degree of certainty, bullshit.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by NosyNed, posted 07-12-2005 12:55 AM NosyNed has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1371 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 36 of 52 (223496)
07-12-2005 8:35 PM
Reply to: Message 3 by aristarchus
07-12-2005 1:58 AM


Re: Trust your feelings Luke
conspiracy theories don't hold water
supposing that bush knew something about the bombings, we have two options to explain why he or other gov't groups (cia etc) did not act:
1. some kind of vast conspiracy
2. gross incompetance and beaurocracy
which one sounds like our government to you?

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 3 by aristarchus, posted 07-12-2005 1:58 AM aristarchus has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024