Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,437 Year: 3,694/9,624 Month: 565/974 Week: 178/276 Day: 18/34 Hour: 2/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   On Judging Others
nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 46 of 121 (340651)
08-16-2006 8:48 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Hyroglyphx
08-16-2006 7:31 PM


Re: political correctness
quote:
I agree, if you are born in the US, then you are an American.
Except, according to George Bush, if you are an Atheist.
Atheists shouldn't be allowed to be citizens, according to him.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 7:31 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 49 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 9:13 PM nator has not replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6375 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 47 of 121 (340653)
08-16-2006 9:03 PM
Reply to: Message 43 by robinrohan
08-16-2006 8:04 PM


Re: political correctness
Found it - despite search not wanting to play
Having read the replies (the first few rounds from jar, mikehager and Discreet Label) and I have to say I think you have grounds for feeling aggrieved, at least with mikehager and Discrete Label.
However, without wishing to appear to be trying to read minds I suspect the response you got had more to do with the persona you adopt on this board and the reaction it provokes in people than with Political Correctness.
My feeling is what you said was misinterpreted (and that was because the people involved put a bad - and in my opinion unjustified - interpretation on what you said).

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 43 by robinrohan, posted 08-16-2006 8:04 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 57 by robinrohan, posted 08-17-2006 7:24 AM MangyTiger has not replied

MangyTiger
Member (Idle past 6375 days)
Posts: 989
From: Leicester, UK
Joined: 07-30-2004


Message 48 of 121 (340655)
08-16-2006 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by nator
08-16-2006 8:34 PM


Re: political correctness
Much as it galls to have to agree with Faith on something if you get an Atlas and look at the countries bounded by the ones she listed I think you'll find the enclosed area covers all the countries you list except Portugal (she should have said the Iberian peninsular rather than just Spain).

Oops! Wrong Planet

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:34 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 10:45 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 49 of 121 (340656)
08-16-2006 9:13 PM
Reply to: Message 46 by nator
08-16-2006 8:48 PM


Re: political correctness
Except, according to George Bush, if you are an Atheist. Atheists shouldn't be allowed to be citizens, according to him.
When did he say that?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 46 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:48 PM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 10:50 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 50 of 121 (340663)
08-16-2006 9:51 PM
Reply to: Message 44 by nator
08-16-2006 8:34 PM


Re: political correctness
Gee, I thought my boundaries were pretty inclusive of all that but maybe not.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.
Edited by Faith, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 44 by nator, posted 08-16-2006 8:34 PM nator has not replied

Quetzal
Member (Idle past 5894 days)
Posts: 3228
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 51 of 121 (340669)
08-16-2006 10:38 PM
Reply to: Message 37 by Hyroglyphx
08-16-2006 7:31 PM


Re: political correctness
Your second point is just as good. For whatever reason, America claimed for itself the name adopted by Amerigo Vespucci, "America." I mean, I'm half Ecuadorian myself and even a very Castillian surname, but it doesn't bother me. Then again, I'm an American, so I don't know how South or other North Amricans feel about it.
I've lived extensively in both Central and South America. There appears to be a slight difference in outlook between the two. In Central America, they refer to themselves in the collective as either "centroamericanos" or "americanos". In South America, they refer to themselves as "latinoamericanos" - a grouping which they insist doesn't include other latin americans such as the Central Americans. I guess everybody has their issues on this particular subject.
As far as I can tell, Native Americans would like to be referred to as their tribe affiliation. A Hopi does not consider a Navajo to be the same, even though they likely have similar DNA. But I guess its the same as why someone from Norway wouldn't want to be affiliated with Swedes, even if they share Nordic traits.
You are 100% correct. Interesting that you should mention the Hopi and Navajo. I'm originally from the southwest, and the bare tolerance between the two groups is noticeable. They have very different cultures, and don't even speak a language from the same language family (Navajo is Athabaskan, Hopi is an Uto-Azteca derivative). I learned early on not to make the mistake of lumping all indigenous groups into one collective pot. The Dineh (literally, "The People") would be extraordinarily insulted to be mistaken for the Hopituh (literally, "The Peaceful Ones"), and vice versa. In this context, "Indian" isn't any better than "Native American", IMO.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 37 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 7:31 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 54 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 10:52 PM Quetzal has not replied

Faith 
Suspended Member (Idle past 1466 days)
Posts: 35298
From: Nevada, USA
Joined: 10-06-2001


Message 52 of 121 (340670)
08-16-2006 10:45 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by MangyTiger
08-16-2006 9:13 PM


Re: political correctness
Thanks. The nitpicking does get to one.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by MangyTiger, posted 08-16-2006 9:13 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 59 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 10:17 AM Faith has replied

crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 53 of 121 (340673)
08-16-2006 10:50 PM
Reply to: Message 49 by Hyroglyphx
08-16-2006 9:13 PM


Re: political correctness
In a news conference at Chicago O'Hare airport, Bush (Sr. is who we're talking about, BTW) addressed the entire nation:
quote:
I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 49 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 9:13 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 55 by Hyroglyphx, posted 08-16-2006 10:55 PM crashfrog has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 54 of 121 (340674)
08-16-2006 10:52 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Quetzal
08-16-2006 10:38 PM


Re: political correctness
You are 100% correct. Interesting that you should mention the Hopi and Navajo. I'm originally from the southwest, and the bare tolerance between the two groups is noticeable. They have very different cultures, and don't even speak a language from the same language family (Navajo is Athabaskan, Hopi is an Uto-Azteca derivative). I learned early on not to make the mistake of lumping all indigenous groups into one collective pot. The Dineh (literally, "The People") would be extraordinarily insulted to be mistaken for the Hopituh (literally, "The Peaceful Ones"), and vice versa. In this context, "Indian" isn't any better than "Native American", IMO.
The last placed I lived was just about 10 miles from the Navajo-Hopi Reservation which meant that there was a very high population of indigenous peoples. Both groups seem to dislike just about anyone not directly affiliated with their tribe, but I noticed even a more striking disparity between the two tribes. I also knew a Cherokee who moved onto that Rez and neither group treated him very well because he was an outsider. Certainly I knew their cultures were a bit different and their language was different, but I was under the assumption that the difference between Hopi and Navajo and were, perhaps, the difference between Cantonese and Mandarin. As you've elucidated, that isn't the case at all. And to even further show how Native Americans are extremely diverse, its my understanding that certain tribes do not come from Sino-asiatic blood, but rather, some share more DNA markers with Vikings. I can't recall which East Coast tribes those are, but I'm sure somebody will know what I'm talking about.

“If chance be the father of all flesh then disaster is his rainbow in the sky. And when you hear of, state of emergencies, sniper kills ten, youths go looting, bomb blasts school, it is but the sound of man worshipping his maker” -Steve Turner

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Quetzal, posted 08-16-2006 10:38 PM Quetzal has not replied

Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 55 of 121 (340675)
08-16-2006 10:55 PM
Reply to: Message 53 by crashfrog
08-16-2006 10:50 PM


Re: political correctness
In a news conference at Chicago O'Hare airport, Bush (Sr. is who we're talking about, BTW) addressed the entire nation:
quote:
: I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God.
Well, that's not a good way to get re-elected. Stupid move.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 53 by crashfrog, posted 08-16-2006 10:50 PM crashfrog has not replied

Archer Opteryx
Member (Idle past 3619 days)
Posts: 1811
From: East Asia
Joined: 08-16-2006


Message 56 of 121 (340737)
08-17-2006 6:39 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by robinrohan
08-15-2006 2:46 PM


Re: Judging others
The original idea stated by Yeshua has two parts, doesn't it?
Do not judge, lest you be judged.
For the measure you use to judge others will be used on you.
I confess I've never understood the controversy surrounding this quote, or the loquacious sermonizing it inspires, either.
It looks like a straight-ahead admonition to withhold judgement when facts are still out, and to be careful, considerate, and fair in the hypotheses we form. It acknowledges the right of others to assess us by the same standard we use for them. And it encourages us to consider this reciprocity on the front end, before we proceed.
That's just good advice. On the whole, it's how life works.
A politician in a democratic country is discovered at a strip club. Being at the club is not a crime, but the headline still jeopardizes a career. The politician who run on a strong 'morality' line--to the right or the left--is going to pay a different price than the one who takes a more libertarian stance. Why? Because the public will assess the person's character in large part according the measure the person has used.
One politician goes home red-faced. Another survives, has a long career, and gets teased about it at the retirement dinner. Someone looking at this discrepancy complains 'That's not fair! Where's the uniform standard?'
Ah, but there is none. Each standard is a custom fit, and we are the tailors.

Archer

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by robinrohan, posted 08-15-2006 2:46 PM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 58 by robinrohan, posted 08-17-2006 7:27 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 57 of 121 (340743)
08-17-2006 7:24 AM
Reply to: Message 47 by MangyTiger
08-16-2006 9:03 PM


Re: political correctness
However, without wishing to appear to be trying to read minds I suspect the response you got had more to do with the persona you adopt on this board and the reaction it provokes in people than with Political Correctness.
My feeling is what you said was misinterpreted (and that was because the people involved put a bad - and in my opinion unjustified - interpretation on what you said).
It was misintepreted because of their knee-jerk politically correct reaction.
One must not feel sympathy for anybody because that means you are judging them--a rule of politically correct morality that stifles naturally good sympathetic feelings.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 47 by MangyTiger, posted 08-16-2006 9:03 PM MangyTiger has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 60 by nator, posted 08-18-2006 10:19 AM robinrohan has replied
 Message 85 by Discreet Label, posted 08-18-2006 7:40 PM robinrohan has not replied

robinrohan
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 121 (340746)
08-17-2006 7:27 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Archer Opteryx
08-17-2006 6:39 AM


Re: Judging others
Ah, but there is none. Each standard is a custom fit, and we are the tailors.
Very well expressed.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Archer Opteryx, posted 08-17-2006 6:39 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 59 of 121 (341041)
08-18-2006 10:17 AM
Reply to: Message 52 by Faith
08-16-2006 10:45 PM


no comment, faith? I am interested in what you have to say

This message is a reply to:
 Message 52 by Faith, posted 08-16-2006 10:45 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 62 by Faith, posted 08-18-2006 11:24 AM nator has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2191 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 60 of 121 (341042)
08-18-2006 10:19 AM
Reply to: Message 57 by robinrohan
08-17-2006 7:24 AM


Re: political correctness
quote:
It was misintepreted because of their knee-jerk politically correct reaction.
Or, as was suggested, the response you got had more to do with the persona you adopt on this board and the reaction it provokes in people than with Political Correctness.

"Science is like a blabbermouth who ruins a movie by telling you how it ends! Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!"
- Ned Flanders
"Question with boldness even the existence of God; because, if there be one, he must more approve of the homage of reason than that of blindfolded fear." - Thomas Jefferson

This message is a reply to:
 Message 57 by robinrohan, posted 08-17-2006 7:24 AM robinrohan has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 61 by robinrohan, posted 08-18-2006 11:12 AM nator has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024