Anyone else notice this pattern?

whar iv yu ecicated flok ar to eidcated too uundastand sum of us

i unerstans yu. its two ard fr um. I will translate for you Heinrik.Many of these posts are condescending and infer inferiority. When in fact, the organised trained mind rarely understands anything outside of it's way of thinking.

Here's the example you asked for. Do you require any more proof?

I think you understood perfectly well what I meant so why the need to correct me, if indeed you did? Haven't you something to say about the condescending attitude and the inferrence of inferiority?

Is your first quote lack of agreement or lack of understanding? What is crap apart from your response? If you already believe it's crap why should I spend my time trying to convince you otherwise?You can drag a horse to water but you can't make it drink.Edited by dameeva, : No reason given.

Did you decipher Heinriks post? You ignored that one. Did my post insult you? Well maybe now you know how others feel with your condescending attitude. Try a bit harder to communicate with those who are not as articulate as you. You might learn something.

It's good that you admit you are condescending but maybe you are confusing it with being judgmental, or maybe you are both. I don't care either, I don't have much to do with those of your superior attitude when you don't understand a goddamn thing about the effect you have on others. It's called EMPATHY. Did you study that in your fine education?
If this sounds angry, it is. I don't have much empathy or understanding for you and this is the effect you have on those who don't take kindly to your attitude.
What are you people trying to prove??????????????????

You didn't answer my question. You obviously did not appreciate me inferring you might be wrong hey? This is exactly how others feel with this condescending superior attitude. It doesn't matter who is right or wrong, people have feelings to be taken into account.I'm sorry I pushed your button. It was not my intention as I believe there isn't that much difference between imply and infer. I did look them both up and my meaning was perfectly clear. There was no need whatsoever for you to show your superiority, even if you were right. There is no need to call my alledged mistake 'STUPID' either.Your reason, I believe, was that you corrected me to stop me looking foolish as I am arguing against ignorance? I am, YOURS and the rest who have no idea how their judgmental attitude hurts, belittles, angers and much more. I am suggesting that this attitude, though innocent, has an effect on others that you may not be aware of.Example: None of you responded to Heinriks' post of one sentence with every word spelled wrong and void of punctuation. He made a very valid point and no-one picked it up. Why was that?There is no action without a reaction. I was innocently doing to you what you innocently do to others. I see my behaviour at antagonizing others and it was truly unintentional.This is how I truly feel. I love your minds. I love the english language. I love communication with others. I love this thread.The only beef I have is the dissconnection the attitude creates between human beings purely because we are different. Not inferior or superior. Just different. We need to embrace this difference and see that we all have something to offer.Those of you very bright people should be leading the way and using your gifts to help others, not hurt them and dismiss them.

You are confusing lack of education with someone who is as pig-headed as yourself, no offense intended, but I can't think of a better word. My apologies for not being as articulate as you.rahvin, we can only know what we know. If I knew exactly what you knew there would be no need of you and we would have to fight. I am trying to bring to your awareness something that the intelligent mindset cannot comprehend. The mindset blocks certain information that does not fit the criteria.Now we are in the same position as you describe above except, I know something you do not and you are becoming annoyed with me because I disagree with you. You are disagreeing with me too but you won't see the connection because you are right on both counts, right?

Are you suggesting 'sympathy' instaed of 'empathy?

Well seeing as it's all irrelevant to you, it won't matter if I respond in a sarcastic manner. Your judgment (which doesn't matter because you are right) of me feeling inferior is BULLSHIT! You could not be more mistaken. You won't even be able to admit you are wrong if you get caught with your hand in the till.Don't even go there trying to patronise me with 'widdle' feelings. Who the hell do you think you are? If that isn't the epitome of condescending behaviour I don't know what is.If I wasn't here you would be still debating how clever you are and how inferior others are compared to you without opposition. You all jsu nod and agree with each other. That's not a debate. That mass mentality.The person who doesn't understand the meaning of theory may need to be taught differently. This person is clearly having something rammed down their throat that they cannot comprehend and it is judged harshly. Why keep using the same method for everyone when we are all different? If we all had the same academic intelligence, who would want to do the menial work? None of this occurs to your closed mind.I am not speaking om my own behalf. I don't need your opinion to identify myself. But others do. Others rely on you to understnd them and they trust you because you are educated. Most of these posts don't give a shit about others and prefer to be amongst their own kind. You don't know what you are missing.

Jesus, I'm wrong again, I thought it was the 'coffee house.'

Honesty is the best policy and I admit that I leave myself wide open on purpose. I want to observe the reactions. I'm having a truly good time and thanks for your concern towards my feelings.

It amazes me how you can quote something as true because someone important said it. E.G I doubt Eleanor Roosevelt ever experienced feeling inferior and yet it is taken as true.
Have you heard of brainwashing, influence, manipulation? Believe me these all happen without consent. And who do you suppose is going to battle for those who cannot respond in enough of an academic way that you can understand, if not me? You think I haven't? Exactly!!! This thread proves this point. Those who are wrong believe they are right because they imagine they are superior in more than their writing and debating skills. Don't you mean if one IS a good writer, they need to respond accordingly and not stoop to the personal? Some comments made of those not as literate have been down right personal and they cannot respond accordingly, as many of these posts have pointed out. Haven't you noticed? They do maintain their distance. There is only me who is a glutton for punishment and I do get pummled and one day the 'pummelers' will see themselves and stop it.

What if you educated folk are too educated to understand some of us?