Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11

Just curious. Do you question the moon landings, too?I heard a great conspiracy theory once about Hillary Clinton sabotaging JFK Jr's plane so she wouldn't have to face him in the primary for NY senator. Did you buy into that one? I hope so, because I've always had a question about it I've been hoping someone would answer.Why would Hillary go to such lengths to take out a cupcake like JFK Jr who wasn't even running for the job and leave people like Rudy and Barack walking around today? And if that's how Hillary does business, you'd think Bill and Monica would be wearing more of a deer-in-the-headlights look these past few years as well. What's the official CT word on that?

---

ArcherAll species are transitional.

Personally, I think that one grassy knoll, acting alone, accounts for everything.Never trust those grassy knolls.

The title of this thread is hilarious.

Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11[?]

It was not only 'scientifically possible' for the towers to fall--it was possible, period. They did.Our OP was out for the count before the conspiracy theory was even introduced.___Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.Edited by Archer Opterix, : brev.

They laughed at Copernicus, they laughed at Galileo,
but they also laughed at Bozo the Clown.

​

- Carl Sagan

____Edited by Archer Opterix, : attrib.