Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Was the destruction of the twin towers scientifically possible on 9/11
Vacate
Member (Idle past 4622 days)
Posts: 565
Joined: 10-01-2006


Message 120 of 151 (462242)
04-01-2008 7:02 PM
Reply to: Message 119 by lost-apathy
04-01-2008 4:34 PM


1. WTC 7 WAS NOT hit by a plane.
No, much worse it was hit with 2 buildings
2. It fell in 6 seconds, which means there was absolutely no resistance throughout the building. Pancake theory is a joke, lol.
I agree, but it was hit with two buildings.
3. The melting of steel does not all the sudden destroy the whole frame all at once. If it did melt the steel, it would have been a gradual process that takes hours. Not 6 seconds.
It gradually melts the steel and then hits a critical point 'cause it was hit with two buildings.
4. Several explosions were heard and recorded.
I wonder if the fuel that started the fire is explosive?
5. The owner of the building himself said they "pulled it"
This one is the best part of the whole WTC 7 business. Seriously, when was the last time you saw fireman asking the owner of a building for advice on how to deal with a fire?
Data gathering is something that never hurts anyone.
Get started then.
debunking911.com - contact with domain owner | Epik.com
Edited by Vacate, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 119 by lost-apathy, posted 04-01-2008 4:34 PM lost-apathy has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024