Hince an obsevation that seems to support a global flood, that even when we find land animals they are generally buried with water borne creatures.
But this is not true, which is why you have no evidence for it.
Evolutionist claim that the geological column was greated over hundreds of millions of years, however there is a large amount of observational data that indicates otherwise.
But this is not true, which is why you have no evidence for it.
More observable evidence of a recent catostrophic global flood, and the resultant adaptation of surviving species to the new, greatly altered, environment; as well as the subsiquent extinction of those that could not adapt. This same 'bottlekneck' can be found in almost every species alive today, including humans.
But this is not true, which is why you have no evidence for it.
They are proof of an organisms ability to adapt to a particular environment. This process does not add any new genetic information, it can only work with what it has and for the most part results in a loss of genetic divercity/variability.
But this is not true, which is why you have no evidence for it.
The evidence for both sides is the same only the starting presuppositions are different.
And this is the Biggest Creationist Lie Of Them All.
We are not looking at the same evidence. Scientists look at evidence. Creationists look at made-up nonsense for which they have no evidence. As you have just demonstrated.
™ Version 4.2