Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,870 Year: 4,127/9,624 Month: 998/974 Week: 325/286 Day: 46/40 Hour: 1/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   REAL Flood Geology
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 6 of 137 (364875)
11-20-2006 10:23 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Archer Opteryx
11-20-2006 5:08 AM


Rocks and beyond.
How would the earth look today if there had been a global catastrophic flood between 5,000 and 6,000 years ago?
Real water isn't magic. It behaves in real ways.
What would we find today--in rocks, in the atmosphere, in flora and fauna?
One correction. According to the Biblical Creationists the earth and universe were formed 6000 years ago. The flood is more like 4000 to 4500 years ago. Oetzi is contemporary with Adam, not Noah.
There would be a jumble of fossils of ALL species that ever lived in one distinct layer. Within that layer the fossils might be sorted by density, but will not be sorted by species. For example, all types of pollen of similar density will be found in the same layer.
In flora and fauna, there will be a monstrous big bottle neck signature in every species of plant and animal pointing to a most recent common ancestor at the time of the flood. This signature would be so common and so ubiquitous that every geneticist would see it as a large and easily identifiable marker like the K/T boundary is to geologists.
World wide, the predominate sign of erosion will be short term water transport. We should not see signs of long term weathering.
Since the earth was created on a few thousand years before the flood, and the flood was basically a one year event, and since the flood mechanisms similar to those we see today have been in play, there should be NO accumulation of weathered rockpiles at the base of cliffs.
Since the earth was created only a few thousand years before the flood, the geological column should consist of three main layers, the lower being all primary rocks, a slim distinct layer containing a jumbled mess of rocks, fossils and debris that is the signature of the flood with a single layer of sedimentary rocks above.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-20-2006 5:08 AM Archer Opteryx has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 9 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-20-2006 3:26 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 30 of 137 (365143)
11-21-2006 11:57 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by Archer Opteryx
11-21-2006 3:52 AM


Re: earth ages
That is still not a problem. Remember, to flood everything above even the peeks, the Floodist pretend that there were no high mountains so that a few thousand feet of water is all that is needed to cover the earth.
Any mountain over a few thousand feet tall that exits today must be a POST flood creation.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by Archer Opteryx, posted 11-21-2006 3:52 AM Archer Opteryx has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 123 of 137 (372325)
12-26-2006 4:19 PM
Reply to: Message 122 by iceage
12-26-2006 3:21 PM


Re: Marine Fossils on mountain tops
How can Flood Geology explain the common occurrence of sea shell, coral, and sponge fossils at the upper end of many geological columns.
That part is easy. The tops were low until after the flood and got shoved up.
What is hard to explain how the sea shells, coral and sponge fossils got INTO the rocks. What is hard to explain is how the examples found INSIDE the rocks is of older, more ancient specimens than are often found in lower levels elsewhere?

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 122 by iceage, posted 12-26-2006 3:21 PM iceage has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 125 by iceage, posted 12-26-2006 6:16 PM jar has not replied

  
jar
Member (Idle past 422 days)
Posts: 34026
From: Texas!!
Joined: 04-20-2004


Message 127 of 137 (372354)
12-26-2006 7:04 PM
Reply to: Message 126 by Buzsaw
12-26-2006 6:49 PM


Re: Magic Water
I believe Ballard's Black Sea discovery of a lower pre-flood sea level confirms that pre-flood seas were much lower than what is observed today.
Except, of course, that was not what Ballard discovered.
It has been known for some time that in the past both the Black Sea and the Mediterranean were closed lakes. During those period the water level in them was considerably lower than it is today.
That has NOTHING to do with any imaginary pre-flood period beyond the fact that the water level in those two bodies of water rose when they were opened to other sources.
It tells us NOTHING about what sea level was or that there was ever any world-wide flood.

Aslan is not a Tame Lion

This message is a reply to:
 Message 126 by Buzsaw, posted 12-26-2006 6:49 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024