Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 63 (9162 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 916,387 Year: 3,644/9,624 Month: 515/974 Week: 128/276 Day: 2/23 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Geology- working up from basic principles.
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 64 of 156 (419629)
09-03-2007 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 63 by Ihategod
09-03-2007 9:01 PM


Re: Law of superposition (revisited)
Why does it have to be flat?
Because things fall down?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 63 by Ihategod, posted 09-03-2007 9:01 PM Ihategod has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 68 of 156 (419689)
09-04-2007 8:08 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by The Matt
09-04-2007 6:01 AM


Re: horizontality revisited
The angle of repose for dry sand for example is nearly 30 degrees, and saturated sand closer to zero.
Vashgun, do this little experiment for yourself: swipe a pint of sand from a sandbox, beach, or a construction site. Let it dry out well. Then see how steep of a cone you can make with it - say by pouring it through a funnel or even out of your fist.
Then make a cone under water in a saucepan or a plastic tub. Compare its steepness to that of the dry cone.
You'll see what The Matt is talking about for yourself.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by The Matt, posted 09-04-2007 6:01 AM The Matt has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 104 of 156 (518278)
08-04-2009 10:29 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by Kitsune
07-29-2009 4:17 AM


Re: What is the creationist point, in bringing up Walther's Law?
All I really need to know is how steep the slope needs to be (roughly) for the sediment to slide down rather than be deposited
Based on long-ago experiments of my own, sand has an "angle of repose" of maybe 30 degrees if dry (look at a sand dune) and perhaps 5 degrees if under water. These were the glass pie-plate and sandbox sand sort of experiments, you understand...
But Googling "angle of repose" might bear fruit, LL. I'm going to bed rather than search, though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by Kitsune, posted 07-29-2009 4:17 AM Kitsune has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 109 by stewartreeve, posted 01-06-2010 7:21 AM Coragyps has replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 110 of 156 (541765)
01-06-2010 7:56 AM
Reply to: Message 109 by stewartreeve
01-06-2010 7:21 AM


Re: What is the creationist point, in bringing up Walther's Law?
Hello, Stewart, and welcome to EvC!
You say:
Possibly, but i would assert that it all depends on conditions...
I've seen experiments with sediment in flumes where sand reaches angles of > 30 degrees.
And I'm sure that such experiments have been done. But I don't think that you'll find many flumes supplied with sand-laden sediment out in nature. And, if I remember this thread right, we were specifically talking about the Coconino Sandstone, where other evidence, like animal tracks and etching of grains, points to being wind-laid.
And don't accuse geologists of "assuming a mechanism" when they've communally spent the last 180 years or so elucidating mechanisms. Remember, those gentleman-geologist guys in England started out supporting a world flood. It was the observations and experiments that they themselves did that proved it to be mythical.
Edited by Coragyps, : No reason given.
Edited by Coragyps, : fix same tag twice

"The wretched world lies now under the tyranny of foolishness; things are believed by Christians of such absurdity as no one ever could aforetime induce the heathen to believe." - Agobard of Lyons, ca. 830 AD

This message is a reply to:
 Message 109 by stewartreeve, posted 01-06-2010 7:21 AM stewartreeve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 111 by stewartreeve, posted 01-06-2010 5:33 PM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 119 of 156 (542057)
01-07-2010 12:07 PM
Reply to: Message 116 by stewartreeve
01-06-2010 10:51 PM


Hopefully the clay-settling notion (of being slow) is also not a "Principle" (though i do hear that A LOT!), as isn't even the norm...i still scratch my head at why geos keep saying it's so....it's just not....
Geologists and oceanographers putting sediment traps in the bottom of bodies of water and actually measuring how sediment accumulates may have a lot to do with why they say that. And ferric chloride, or polyacrylamide, or polyDADMAC aren't really that abundant in natural waters, anyway.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 116 by stewartreeve, posted 01-06-2010 10:51 PM stewartreeve has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 123 by stewartreeve, posted 01-08-2010 9:11 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Coragyps
Member (Idle past 755 days)
Posts: 5553
From: Snyder, Texas, USA
Joined: 11-12-2002


Message 136 of 156 (542617)
01-11-2010 9:28 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by petrophysics1
01-11-2010 7:56 AM


Re: On the timelyness of replies and focus on the topic
Sorry, I have to go, I have to do my morning report on the 6 gas wells I'm drilling for EnCana Oil and Gas.
Where? In the Haynesville? They sure seem to be getting back to busy in the Barnett, too.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by petrophysics1, posted 01-11-2010 7:56 AM petrophysics1 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by petrophysics1, posted 01-11-2010 10:55 AM Coragyps has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024