|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
Thread ▼ Details |
|
Thread Info
|
|
|
Author | Topic: The predictions of Walt Brown | |||||||||||||||||||||||
CK Member (Idle past 4127 days) Posts: 3221 Joined: |
quote: And you don't see the most obvious blinding problem? Nice try with the "spin" stuff - it's a good switch and bait tactic intended to a)make us angry so that you can accuse us of bad manners and storm off b)divert from what you are saying. It's a nice try but you lack in too many basics to pull it off.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2284 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.8 |
DrJones, One last spin, the bible says the atmosphere was rolled back, it says the windows of heaven were opened. Given the atmosphere is rolled back it wouldn't be any atmosphere to be heated on its way up. Well if you're going to rely on magic just say so instead of pretending that there is some scientific explanation. Could you explain how Noah and the animals lived with no air to breath?
Were talking about water just welled up above the atmosphere, don't see this as a problem. What do you mean "welled up above the atmosphere"? If its above the atmosphere it's going to gain alot of speed on the way down. Do you not understand simple physics? edited to add:
I took it that JonF is saying rain fell our of orbit it would pick up such speed that when it hit the atmosphere it would generate heat When one moving object collides with another object heat is always generated, no matter what speed the first object is moving at. Take a hammer and pound on a piece of metal for a while, both the hammer and the metal will get hotter. Once more its simple high school physics. This message has been edited by DrJones*, 01-22-2005 18:17 AM This message has been edited by DrJones*, 01-22-2005 18:17 AM *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5591 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
DrJones, Got to spin on out of here, the window of heaven (atmosphere) was opened by the super steamed water pressing it aside.
Noah had greater air pressure with all air being displaced and all this water pressing downward on the atmosphere. Take CareTom
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2284 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.8 |
DrJones, Got to spin on out of here, the window of heaven (atmosphere) was opened by the super steamed water pressing it aside. For the steam to press aside the atmosphere it would have to touch the atmosphere and it would have to be in contact for the whole time the steam was spewing upwards. With contact you get heat transfer. The steam will lose heat to the atmosphere. Noah fries.
Noah had greater air pressure with all air being displaced and all this water pressing downward on the atmosphere How did Noah survive this increased air pressure? This message has been edited by DrJones*, 01-22-2005 18:25 AM *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
jar Member (Idle past 394 days) Posts: 34026 From: Texas!! Joined: |
Bye Charley.
Aslan is not a Tame Lion
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Rain can only fall so fast in the atmosphere. I took it that JonF is saying rain fell our of orbit it would pick up such speed that when it hit the atmosphere it would generate heat. Were talking about water just welled up above the atmosphere, don't see this as a problem. Well, sorry, but you are totally ignorant of the subject. That's why you don't see the problem. Yes, rain can only fall so fast in the atmosphere, but that's irrelevant. I didn't say anythign about speed. I just said "energy is conserved", and that's all you need to know. Energy is conserved. It is neither ceated nor destroyed. When the water shoots out of the ground, it has kinetic energy (lots of kinetic energy, if it's going to it make it out of the atmosphere). When the water is back on the surface of the Earth, it doesn't have that kinetic energy anymore. The energy doesn't get destroyed; it goes somewhere. The only place it can go is into the Earth's atmosphere, as heat. How it turns into heat is an interesting question, but the fact that it turns into heat is not a question at all. It's just a fact. Now, consider a raindrop falling in the atmosphere. Yes, it can only go so fast. Why? Because of friction with the air. And what does that friction with the air do? It dissipates some of the energy of the fall of the raindrop as heat that warms the atmosphere. The rest of the energy of the fall of the raindrop gets converted into heat when the raindrop strikes the Earth. All the kinetic or potential energy that the raindrop had is converted to heat, no matter how fast it falls. For normal rain, the effect is small; but for half the current contents of the ocean (which is more than fifty thousand times more than all the water in the atmosphere, see Where is Earth's water located?) falling from hundreds of miles high (normal raindrops fall less than five miles), the effect would be gigantic ... heating the atmosphere enough to destroy all life. The amount of heat added to the atmosphere is the amount of kinetic energy the water had when it jetted out, plus whatever heat transfers as the water goes by. No matter how the water gets back to Earth, no matter how fast a raindrop can fall, no matter anything. That's the heat added to the atmosphere. Of course, if the water jetting out doesn't have enough kinetic energy to make it out of the atmosphere, then the effect is much smaller ... but then all the heat in the water (manifested as high temperature) transfers to the atmosphere rather than being cooled in space, and everybody's dead again.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
Given the atmosphere is rolled back there wouldn't be any atmosphere to be heated on its way up. And, for the third time, everyone would die of suffocation. Or from the far-more-than-hurricane-force winds that would create.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5591 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
DrJones, It would only be heating the fringes of the ocean and the atmosphere. The increase in air pressure was likely not all that great cause this outpouring happened over 40 days/nights. It likely just made breathing easier within the ark. You have so many questions, perhaps you should just read Walts book.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4959 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
That was quick!
Now that you have been shown that you really have no clue what you are talking about, do you have any intention of educating yourself? Brian.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
DrJones* Member Posts: 2284 From: Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Joined: Member Rating: 6.8 |
DrJones, It would only be heating the fringes of the ocean and the atmosphere. So now you're rretracting your previous claim that it wouldn't heat the atmosphere or ocean at all?
You have so many questions, perhaps you should just read Walts book. If what you're proposing here is representative of the material in the book then its obbviously garbage not worth my time or money. *not an actual doctor
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
johnfolton  Suspended Member (Idle past 5591 days) Posts: 2024 Joined: |
JonF, If it rolled back the atmosphere, Ocean it would be ever so gentle, well at least after perhaps one initial gigantic tsunami. That why Noah built his ark away from the Oceans. They mocked Noah cause he was building an oceanliner perhaps hundreds or thousands of miles from the ocean.
P.S. I know your going to disagree, and you have every right to disagree. I'm now going to let you have the last word. I agree that we disagree.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
JonF Member (Idle past 168 days) Posts: 6174 Joined: |
If it rolled back the atmosphere, Ocean it would be ever so gentle, A supersonic plume of superheated live steam is gentle? It would blow a good portion of the atmosphere out to space, lowering the pressure in that area, and causing incredible winds to flow into tath area to releive the pressure differnetion. I notice that you totally ignored the facts I laid out showing how the atmosphere would be heated when the water returned.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 734 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
The heat would of been dissipated into outer space, as each water molecule heat was sucked out by the cold vacuum of space within and above the erupting fountains of the deep.
I missed or slept through that day in Physical Chemistry class where ol' Blyholder explained how vacuum sucks heat out of molecules. I can't find it in the textbook, either. Would you explain it a little for me, Tom?
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Coragyps Member (Idle past 734 days) Posts: 5553 From: Snyder, Texas, USA Joined: |
If what you're proposing here is representative of the material in the book then its obbviously garbage not worth my time or money.
No money, at least, 'cause it's online:In the Beginning: Compelling Evidence for Creation and the Flood - The Hydroplate Theory: An Overview And it's not all that big a waste of time. It's not as funny as The Onion, but way funnier than, say, Rush Limbaugh.
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Brian Member (Idle past 4959 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: |
Isn't it great how Tom just soldiers on through all this? Head down, arse up and trudge.
|
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024