Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,839 Year: 4,096/9,624 Month: 967/974 Week: 294/286 Day: 15/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   what is feminism?
Ooook!
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 340
From: London, UK
Joined: 09-29-2003


Message 114 of 147 (195538)
03-30-2005 7:34 PM
Reply to: Message 111 by pink sasquatch
03-30-2005 3:39 PM


Re: academia in the mainstream
Disclaimer: As you might know history and politics is not my area of knowledge but I thought I might say a few words. As most of this is based on a history of Britain by Simon Schama and a few scant conversations with more clued up friends, feel free to tell me I'm talking out of my orange furry arse.
Citing a grade-school teacher as an "academic" in the same sense as the modern feminist academic movement is more than a stretch.
To dismiss the mother of Mary Shelley as just another grade-school teacher might be stretching it a bit too. Mary Wollstonecraft had some quite policically academic male contempories, such as Tom Paine, and married William Godwin, who is described (in dis book wot I'm readin') as a social philosopher. Her publications were direct, and scathing attacks on the type of justification for subjugation, that was being spouted at the time. While she may not have been a lecturer in 'woman studies' at suchandsuch college , I think it's safe to class her as an academic of her time.
The problem I see with trying to define academic feminism in those times was that it seems to be closely interwoven with a general push towards greater rights for all. So while it's easy to see how such characters played an important role in changing public opinion of the time, it's harder to confidently label anyone as a 'feminist'.
As for the effect of the Germaine Greers of this world today, well that is a whole different kettle of fish.
I would probably say that because the general concepts from the early days of equalitarian ideas are now so very well accepted in society, then 'academics' can't possibily have the same type of impact:
Academic: "All women..."
Society: "Yes, yes. We're working on it!!"
JMHO

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by pink sasquatch, posted 03-30-2005 3:39 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 115 by macaroniandcheese, posted 03-30-2005 9:42 PM Ooook! has not replied

  
Ooook!
Member (Idle past 5842 days)
Posts: 340
From: London, UK
Joined: 09-29-2003


Message 142 of 147 (196658)
04-04-2005 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 139 by pink sasquatch
04-03-2005 11:39 PM


Pink...mate:
...the assless chaps. Assless chaps. Squeegee the assless chaps. Assless chaps.
Isn't it time you took a couple of the nice tablets and found somewhere dark to lie down for a wee bit?
*Backs slowly away from P.S.*

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by pink sasquatch, posted 04-03-2005 11:39 PM pink sasquatch has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024