Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Gay marraige and the end of the world
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 136 of 195 (279642)
01-17-2006 9:59 AM
Reply to: Message 133 by riVeRraT
01-17-2006 8:25 AM


Transgender roles in other cultures
I don't know much about other cultures but certainly there is a well documented tradition amongst many north american peoples of men and women occupying cultural positions opposite those associated with their biological gender.
I also found this page which has some details of a variety of transgendered roles in a number of areas in Asia. The degree to which such roles are accepted varies and it is sometimes hard to see if the modern attitudes are similar to traditional cultural attitudes to those in transgendered roles.
TTFN,
WK
This message has been edited by Wounded King, 17-Jan-2006 03:18 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 133 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2006 8:25 AM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 137 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2006 11:02 AM Wounded King has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3949 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 137 of 195 (279656)
01-17-2006 11:02 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by Wounded King
01-17-2006 9:59 AM


OT confusion
i think he thinks you meant Old Testament when you said Off Topic. but he seems to be a very confused boy today.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by Wounded King, posted 01-17-2006 9:59 AM Wounded King has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 138 by Wounded King, posted 01-17-2006 12:00 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied
 Message 139 by ReverendDG, posted 01-17-2006 3:42 PM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
Wounded King
Member
Posts: 4149
From: Cincinnati, Ohio, USA
Joined: 04-09-2003


Message 138 of 195 (279664)
01-17-2006 12:00 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by macaroniandcheese
01-17-2006 11:02 AM


Re: OT confusion
That would explain the strange request for 'verses'. The original post was actually ReverendDG not me.
TTFN,
WK

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2006 11:02 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
ReverendDG
Member (Idle past 4131 days)
Posts: 1119
From: Topeka,kansas
Joined: 06-06-2005


Message 139 of 195 (279701)
01-17-2006 3:42 PM
Reply to: Message 137 by macaroniandcheese
01-17-2006 11:02 AM


Re: OT confusion
i was wondering about that..i'm not sure how you get old testiment from OT but interesting, but yes i was talking mostly about north american indian cultures, they also revere transgender people, interesting
as for the topic I really don't see anyone as having the right to dictate who should love who, who could marry who, even religious texts show bias of the views of the authors - including the OT

This message is a reply to:
 Message 137 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2006 11:02 AM macaroniandcheese has not replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 195 (279716)
01-17-2006 4:15 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by riVeRraT
01-16-2006 10:28 PM


Re: History
riVeRraT writes me:
quote:
I want you to know, that I really have been praying to God about this for a long time. I do not get any answers. It is one of the few things that I do not get an answer for. That fustrates me.
Is it possible that God in fact is telling you something, like maybe that he trusts your judgement? You've been opposed to gay marriage for a long time, but you say you've been thinking about it a lot. Why do you think you can't get it out of your mind? I've been talking with you for years and I don't have any sense that you're gay, so I don't think that could be the reason. Maybe you keep thinking about it because you really have been wrong, and God won't let you quit thinking about it. Maybe he's continuously challenging you. Is that possible?
quote:
#1, since I am not gay, I need to some how understand why people are gay. This has not been explained rationally yet, and has not been proven in science yet.
When you put it that way, rat, I don't really have a satisfactory answer. I don't really know what causes it - probably a variation in the brain's development, but I truly have no idea. What I can tell you, with the very certainty with which I know my own name, is that I never made any choice. God made me this way. I've been attracted to other boys for as long as I can remember; when I hit puberty boys were absolutely all I could think about, and I thought about them every bit as intently as straight boys thought about girls. But I couldn't tell anybody. Not anybody at all. Even on the rare occassion that I might get to have some fun with another guy, I had to treat it as though it was almost accidental and didn't mean anything, when I knew damn well it meant everything. So even when I got to "do it", I didn't get to talk about it. It was too shameful.
quote:
Is it possible that if you were born gay, that there may have been an experience that turn you gay that you were not aware of?
That would be some sort of so-called "repressed memory" and I'm not sure I believe in such a thing. The science seems dubious to me. But even if there were something to the idea of a non-remembered incident that made me gay, why should that have any bearing on the way I'm treated by the state? Why should that affect whether or not I'm allowed to marry for love?
quote:
Tell me, do you think as a Christian, should I accept gay marriage or not?
Let me put it this way: the more Christians like you do come to accept it the more likely it is that my faith in God might be restored.
I can't tell you why you should do it from a Christian standpoint better than arachnophilia can so I'll defer to him on that point.
I would like to thank you again, rat, for keeping your mind open.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by riVeRraT, posted 01-16-2006 10:28 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 171 by riVeRraT, posted 01-26-2006 8:40 AM berberry has replied

  
berberry
Inactive Member


Message 141 of 195 (279719)
01-17-2006 4:30 PM


One more important point
Please read this article from the Indianapolis Star about a real-life Brokeback Mountain-type situation, only one where the two do get together and operate a ranch and raise kids. This one ends in a different type of tragedy, one which shows why this fight over gay marriage is so important.
Please read it.

Replies to this message:
 Message 144 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2006 5:23 PM berberry has not replied
 Message 152 by Silent H, posted 01-18-2006 7:44 AM berberry has not replied

  
Trixie
Member (Idle past 3727 days)
Posts: 1011
From: Edinburgh
Joined: 01-03-2004


Message 142 of 195 (279729)
01-17-2006 4:56 PM
Reply to: Message 107 by riVeRraT
01-16-2006 10:28 PM


Does this help?
You asked
Tell me, do you think as a Christian, should I accept gay marriage or not?
You also mentioned that you have been praying about this, but God hasn't answered you.
I think God has answered you. He's led you to start questioning your position. I've always believed that God doesn't respond directly to us, but enables us to deal with the problems we face, rather than removing the problems for us.
To give you an example, when i was studying for my Honours Finals, I wasn't working hard enough because I couldn't be bothered. I knew I faced failing my exams and, lazily, prayed for God to help me pass my exams.
Now, God could have just popped all the info I needed into my head and ensured that easy questions came up, but that would mean I passed without deserving to pass. Instead, what I found was that studying became easier, I didn't get distracted, I started wanting to study and even enjoyed it. The amount of work I put in was enormous, more than I'd ever managed to do. There was never any sense of God having a hand in this, yet I was changed in my opinion of studying and this enabled me to put in the effort required to pass my exams.
I honestly believe that we have all the information we need to decide how we should respond to people who are "different" from us. All of the teachings of Jesus taught us to love one another and to do unto others as they would have them do unto us. We're also taught that God doesn't want us to judge others. So who are we to believe that gay marriage is "wrong"?
Also, consider this. Suppose that being gay is due to a developmental "abnormality" in certain parts of the brain, due to environmental, genetic or hormonal factors. This would mean that a person has no control over whether they are gay or not. Other conditions which are thought to have a similar combination of causes include clubfoot. Now, how would God react if you end up standing in front of Him and He asks you why you objected to clubfoot marriages?
We don't know for sure why some people are gay. There is some evidence that it is physical, not psychological (ie it isn't a choice you can make, but the way you are born). Given that we don't have definitive evidence of the cause, should we condemn gay people? Or should we give them the benefit of the doubt? What if it turns out that it is due to physical causes? Would you have a leg to stand on when you finally get to God and He asks why you behaved the way you did towards gay people who could no more help the way they were born than people with clubfoot can help it?
If there is the slightest chance that the cause of homosexuality is physical, then that is doubt enough for me to say "This isn't for me to judge, this is for God to judge."
To be perfectly honest, even if it were demonstrated to me that homosexuality was a lifestyle choice (and I don't for a minute believe that it is), I would still refuse to judge and leave it to God. I'm not convinced that it matters to God, since the Ten Commandments say nothing about it. They condemn covetousness, adultery, theft, lying, yet no mention of homosexuality.
I hope this rambling response help you in some way to your final decision. The decision is yours to make, God will not make it for you, but He will help you in vague ways to reach it. I think He's already started helping you and I'll pray that He continues to help you until you get to where He wants you to be.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 107 by riVeRraT, posted 01-16-2006 10:28 PM riVeRraT has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 170 by riVeRraT, posted 01-26-2006 8:33 AM Trixie has not replied

  
riVeRraT
Member (Idle past 437 days)
Posts: 5788
From: NY USA
Joined: 05-09-2004


Message 143 of 195 (279732)
01-17-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 129 by nator
01-17-2006 7:57 AM


Re: History
My two straight parents screwed me up so I had to spend years and years trying to fix myself.
Ever consider thats why you don't want to have kids?
You think the reason I am insulted is because I have a "personal problem", and not because you said to my face that you don't think my marriage should even be called a marriage because I have no children?
That is truly mind boggling.
Whats the problem?You can't control my mind, I can think what I want. Why get all fusterd about it? What's the big deal? I am not impossing that you change or that you should consider yourself not married.
Lighted up, for real.
Besides, I really don't have a problem with a man and woman marrying. Man and woman become one. I understand that, because I can relate to the desire.
I can even relate to wanting multiple wives, for it would be one of my own desires. But I can also see how that would not work, or be a practical thing. It only serves a selfish purpose. How could everyone love each other?
What should the ground rules for marriage be? Love and consent? Is that all?
So then we should allow people to marry thier sisters? Where does it end?
Tell me schraf, do you understand gay desire?
Explain it to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 129 by nator, posted 01-17-2006 7:57 AM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 145 by macaroniandcheese, posted 01-17-2006 5:26 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 146 by crashfrog, posted 01-17-2006 6:04 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 150 by arachnophilia, posted 01-17-2006 9:32 PM riVeRraT has not replied
 Message 151 by nator, posted 01-18-2006 12:00 AM riVeRraT has replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3949 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 144 of 195 (279738)
01-17-2006 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by berberry
01-17-2006 4:30 PM


Re: One more important point
that's absolutely horrible.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by berberry, posted 01-17-2006 4:30 PM berberry has not replied

  
macaroniandcheese 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3949 days)
Posts: 4258
Joined: 05-24-2004


Message 145 of 195 (279739)
01-17-2006 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by riVeRraT
01-17-2006 5:06 PM


Re: History
Tell me schraf, do you understand gay desire?
Explain it to me.
i already explained it to you. you didn't listen.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2006 5:06 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
crashfrog
Member (Idle past 1488 days)
Posts: 19762
From: Silver Spring, MD
Joined: 03-20-2003


Message 146 of 195 (279742)
01-17-2006 6:04 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by riVeRraT
01-17-2006 5:06 PM


Re: History
So then we should allow people to marry thier sisters?
What on Earth makes you think that people haven't been marrying their sisters for thousands of years? It's only in recent times that we've made this invalid; it's basically a kind of human eugenics.
Weren't Adam and Eve brother and sister? Twins, in fact?
Where does it end?
It ends where it is now; the right of adults to enter into binding agreements and partnerships with each other.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2006 5:06 PM riVeRraT has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 147 by Brian, posted 01-17-2006 6:13 PM crashfrog has not replied
 Message 149 by RAZD, posted 01-17-2006 9:28 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Brian
Member (Idle past 4980 days)
Posts: 4659
From: Scotland
Joined: 10-22-2002


Message 147 of 195 (279744)
01-17-2006 6:13 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by crashfrog
01-17-2006 6:04 PM


Re: History
What on Earth makes you think that people haven't been marrying their sisters for thousands of years?
Didn't Cleopatra marry two of her brothers?
Brian.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by crashfrog, posted 01-17-2006 6:04 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
Jman
Inactive Member


Message 148 of 195 (279748)
01-17-2006 7:21 PM
Reply to: Message 1 by riVeRraT
01-09-2006 7:06 AM


gays R us
No folks, I'm straight. I do not have the physical "signature" that gays are known to have in a certain part of their brains. I wish I could remember the source.
Being homosexual is natural. Why? Because it occurs in nature. It just isn't prevalent. I believe that since God is the author (creator) of all then God must be responsible for ALL the human types on the planet. It is an opportunity for us to realize what really is behind all this, to decide to set aside irrational fear and to trust that God (something here about infinite wisdom) knows what He's doing.
I wonder why anyone in their right mind would "choose" to be gay when they are fully aware of the social penalties. Gay marriage? Why not? I see no spiritual conumdrum in the issue. I do and have known more than a few gay men in my 63 years. Each, without exception was of above average intelligence, creative and artistic. I have never known a stupid gay man.
In the old testament we read about "abominations before God.....etc". The author then was no different than some of us today. Vocalizing his opinion based on what he feared and believed. The motivator then was tribal stability throuh family strengths under a patriarchial system. Anyone found "outside the box" was dealt with. Sound familiar? Many Middle Eastern cultures have never managed to divest themselves from the old ways. Beliefs do not have to have any basis in anything but in those far off times a leader was always looked to for guidance. A liberal minded patriarch would not have lasted long. Funny how fear has such amazing longivity.
The idea of gay marriage is non-threatening and quite in keeping with the social ideals we so often espouse. Let them marry. After a year or so the fuss will die down and we will know that nothing bad happened after all and the man who lived in the Light of Christ will be certian then that it was correct to abide in what the Father has ordained.
So often we hear, "the practice of religion divides people". Each religious group has a dark side which finds easy access to the unwitting. It is quite pointless to combat ignorance and fear with unfettered logic. So all parties in the great game are positioned to gain by practicing tolerance. If we learn this we will have followed where God leads and how can that be a bad thing?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by riVeRraT, posted 01-09-2006 7:06 AM riVeRraT has not replied

  
RAZD
Member (Idle past 1426 days)
Posts: 20714
From: the other end of the sidewalk
Joined: 03-14-2004


Message 149 of 195 (279767)
01-17-2006 9:28 PM
Reply to: Message 146 by crashfrog
01-17-2006 6:04 PM


Re: History
Weren't Adam and Eve brother and sister? Twins, in fact?
Actually "eve" was a transgendered clone if I understand the story right ...

Join the effort to unravel {AIDS\HIV} with Team EvC! (click)

we are limited in our ability to understand
by our ability to understand
RebelAAmerican.Zen[Deist
... to learn ... to think ... to live ... to laugh ...
to share.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 146 by crashfrog, posted 01-17-2006 6:04 PM crashfrog has not replied

  
arachnophilia
Member (Idle past 1365 days)
Posts: 9069
From: god's waiting room
Joined: 05-21-2004


Message 150 of 195 (279768)
01-17-2006 9:32 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by riVeRraT
01-17-2006 5:06 PM


Re: History
What should the ground rules for marriage be? Love and consent? Is that all?
we can't legislate love. that leaves consent.
So then we should allow people to marry thier sisters? Where does it end?
this is a good question, though not especially on-topic. the anti-gay marriage crowd likes to bring up examples like this to propose a slippery-slope kind of idea.

אָרַח

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by riVeRraT, posted 01-17-2006 5:06 PM riVeRraT has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024