Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,788 Year: 4,045/9,624 Month: 916/974 Week: 243/286 Day: 4/46 Hour: 1/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Flood = many coincidences
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 2 of 445 (490767)
12-08-2008 10:20 AM


Thread moved here from the Proposed New Topics forum.

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 50 of 445 (491257)
12-12-2008 9:49 PM
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
12-12-2008 9:29 PM


take heed, Buz
Please note Message 49 and do not post in this thread again without actual evidence and tightly linked reasoning. I'll suspend for a time if you do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 12-12-2008 9:29 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 55 of 445 (491303)
12-13-2008 7:59 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Buzsaw
12-13-2008 4:41 PM


Evidence
As has been pointed out to you:
You are not supporting your statements. Your "facts" are no such thing. Simply asserting things doesn't make them a fact.
You have had a lot of time to learn this Buz. Since you learn slowly you can have more time. But do NOT continue as you are here.
Support what you say. Give evidence for what you claim are facts.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Buzsaw, posted 12-13-2008 4:41 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 57 of 445 (491310)
12-14-2008 3:20 AM
Reply to: Message 56 by Granny Magda
12-14-2008 12:18 AM


Replying to Buz
You can reply. You might help Buz by seeing if you can get him to understand what evidence might look like. I'm going to give him a few trys to get it right but only so many.
Edited by AdminNosy, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 56 by Granny Magda, posted 12-14-2008 12:18 AM Granny Magda has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 59 of 445 (491322)
12-14-2008 10:32 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Buzsaw
12-14-2008 10:21 AM


another warning
...and in a greenhouse canopy consisting of the atmosphere, ...
Buz, you have been here long enough to know that this has been shown to be utter nonsense. The atmosphere can not hold more than a tiny amount of the needed water without cooking everything. DO NOT bring up junk that has already been thoroughly dealt with.
Before I proceed I need to put forward questions regarding the age of the oceans which arose in my reading on this topic at a .
USGS site by Annenberg/CPB Resources.
Can someone here address these questions raised by Annenberg Resources? I see there has been some discussion about the age of the oceans up thread but nothing said about previous to 200 million years ago, unless I missed that.
You must bring the particular questions here in your own words. Please do that.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 10:21 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 60 of 445 (491323)
12-14-2008 10:34 AM
Reply to: Message 58 by Buzsaw
12-14-2008 10:21 AM


Annenburg question
Buz! The age of the ocean floors question has already been answered. More than once.
DO NOT waste people's time if you aren't going to read! Patience is wearing thin.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 58 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 10:21 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 62 of 445 (491329)
12-14-2008 10:54 AM
Reply to: Message 61 by Buzsaw
12-14-2008 10:45 AM


Re: Undue Oversight Prevails
You are allowed to debate your position Buz. You know the rules: evidence and careful logic.
The only reason for you to run from the thread is because you don't have those. When you do you are more than welcome to post.
Edited by AdminNosy, : author correction

This message is a reply to:
 Message 61 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 10:45 AM Buzsaw has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 63 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 12:45 PM AdminNosy has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 68 of 445 (491353)
12-14-2008 4:24 PM
Reply to: Message 67 by Buzsaw
12-14-2008 3:31 PM


Thank you Buz
and, Buz, if you don't like to work a bit to support you conjectures then please don't start doing this in other science threads either.
as I recall there was one question in the link you provided. That question as already been answered.
The other question you have asked here is not meaningful until you support you assertions.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 67 by Buzsaw, posted 12-14-2008 3:31 PM Buzsaw has not replied

  
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 95 of 445 (491618)
12-18-2008 11:47 AM
Reply to: Message 93 by Buzsaw
12-18-2008 10:39 AM


Read! Buz
Message 94
You have been told this before. Your conjectures have been shown to be flawed. Do not repeat yourself over and over as if you haven't read the replies to you.
If you demonstrate that you are unwilling to bother reading replies to you then I think you shouldn't waste the time of others by posting the same material over and over.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 93 by Buzsaw, posted 12-18-2008 10:39 AM Buzsaw has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024