Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,844 Year: 4,101/9,624 Month: 972/974 Week: 299/286 Day: 20/40 Hour: 1/3


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Flood = many coincidences
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 12 of 445 (490836)
12-09-2008 1:36 AM
Reply to: Message 11 by roxrkool
12-08-2008 10:07 PM


Beauty is Beyond Subservience to Mere Mortals
roxrkool writes:
Once you start looking at how the rocks all intimately fit together over square miles, over hundreds of square miles, and from one continent to another, then you will realize that a global flood is a wholly inadequate model that consistently fails to explain the beautifully intricate and integrated geological puzzle before us.
If you are interested in learning why geologists have made the interpretations they have, pick up a book on historical geology. That's an excellent place to start.
I could not agree more, but would like to add one other point. The entire field of geoscience is interlocked with all other sciences. To deny the radiometric dating requires not just a rejection of geology but also chemistry and physics. To deny an old earth or the requirement of a global flood requires even more, the rejection of anthropology, history, linguistics, and indeed what is commonly referred to as common sense. The list goes on into hundreds of ways all knowledge, in particular scientific knowledge, is not just interrelated but mutually supportive. And for what? an overly simplistic understanding of the Old Testament that dishonors both Christianity in general and the NT in the particular?
Where is the victory in allowing all people to starve to death or become something out of some sci-fi post apocalyptic nightmare because one must destroy all science that is not sanctified by the likes of Ken Ham or the Discovery Institute?
I wish everyone would take the time to see the tremendous beauty of mathematics, real science, and how it all fits together. It is far more awesome than some pompous self-proclaimed intermediary between us and God.

Read not to contradict and confute, not to believe and take for granted, not to find talk and discourse, but to weigh and consider - Francis Bacon
The more we understand particular things, the more we understand God - Spinoza

This message is a reply to:
 Message 11 by roxrkool, posted 12-08-2008 10:07 PM roxrkool has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 13 by roxrkool, posted 12-09-2008 2:58 AM anglagard has seen this message but not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 201 of 445 (555300)
04-13-2010 2:30 AM
Reply to: Message 196 by Architect-426
04-11-2010 11:34 PM


Comedy
Architect-426 writes:
So yes, I am alone on this theory that the earth blew up during the Great Flood — it blew up BIG time.
No wonder they can't find the Ark. Must have landed on Quaror or Sedna.
This is great stuff, have you considered being a comedy act in the creationist circuit?
By the way, architecture began in Mesopotamia, by the offspring of Noah. Irrefutable historical fact and all architects know this.
Well, I guess if you already speak for all gods, speaking for all architects is not much of a stretch.
Hilarious, how did I miss this?

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 196 by Architect-426, posted 04-11-2010 11:34 PM Architect-426 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 207 by Architect-426, posted 04-24-2010 9:12 PM anglagard has seen this message but not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 267 of 445 (596475)
12-15-2010 1:41 AM
Reply to: Message 262 by Architect-426
12-14-2010 6:57 PM


Re: Plate Tectonics is a joke - "movement" measured in minimeters...
Architect-426 writes:
I’m guessing that 2 cm/year is about as ridiculous as it comes in terms of plate tectonics actually doing anything. I’m also guessing that practically the entire scientific community, including yourself, does not realize how incredibly comical stating these alleged cm/yr of plate movement truly sounds. Therefore (no guessing on this one), plate tectonics is hopelessly impotent and is thus incapable of stacking rocks in situ. Perhaps some Viagra should to be injected into the lithosphere so the plates can, well, giddy up a bit
This is one of the most incredibly ignorant statements I have ever witnessed in this forum.
Just for one little example of which there are thousands, let us consider the town of Hollister, California.
The primary claim to fame Hollister has is that it was the inspiration for the movie the The Wild One when a bunch of proto-bikers descended upon the city and a few fistfights occurred a few years after WW2, thus inspiring an entire cultural phenomena.
The next claim to fame is that the high school built bleachers directly over the San Andreas fault, otherwise known as the boundary between the Pacific and North American plates in this tectonics you swear does not exist.
The bleachers were put up in 1957 IIRC, by 1977 they were diagonally displaced by 18", which to anyone with a calculator can figure as 22.5 mm or 2.25 cm per year.
This example is famous among people who actually study the earth as opposed to the ignorant who pronounce without the slightest semblance of knowledge or experience. The movement is largely continuous and evidenced by thousands. I have seen it myself.
So what should I believe? Direct evidence of tectonic movement between plates that I have personally seen over a few years or you?
I think I will see that which God demonstrates directly over those who willfully deny the work of God for their personal ego and therefore violate the first commandment -- along with the one against bearing false witness.
Troll?
Edited by anglagard, : add a 'has' after Hollister claim to fame. I hate improper English usage although ESL is excusable.

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 262 by Architect-426, posted 12-14-2010 6:57 PM Architect-426 has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 268 by Taq, posted 12-15-2010 4:45 PM anglagard has seen this message but not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 283 of 445 (598289)
12-30-2010 1:04 AM
Reply to: Message 282 by Architect-426
12-29-2010 10:10 PM


Re: Sea-Floor "spreading" is false - Plate Tectonics is finished
{Content hidden. Message should never have been posted - Adminnemooseus}
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Content hidden, add message.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 282 by Architect-426, posted 12-29-2010 10:10 PM Architect-426 has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 286 of 445 (598298)
12-30-2010 4:05 AM
Reply to: Message 281 by Architect-426
12-29-2010 10:10 PM


Please Provide Evidence
Deleted by Poster. Too much rambling not enough focus.
Edited by anglagard, : No reason given.

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 281 by Architect-426, posted 12-29-2010 10:10 PM Architect-426 has not replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 430 of 445 (614053)
05-01-2011 1:02 AM
Reply to: Message 425 by Robert Byers
04-29-2011 2:42 AM


Take a Hint
Robert Byers writes:
I use the word forces instead of processes because geology is about results in structures of the earth. Chemical breakdown is so minor in affecting the earth structures that in effect its a atomic process on low power merely breaking things done.
Geology surely is about forces moving things however slow or fast.
Chemistry is on a boundary of the real segregational divisions here.
Chemical break down is trivial as any evidence of earth events and processes of note.
Geology is about pick axes and dynamite. Not test tubes.
They just have to include it in geology class under a big tent because it rides a boundary in a minor way. not the real mccoy as i see it.
The absolute ignorance of this statement leaves me aghast.
Look up the term "geochemistry" in Wikipedia, if you can't be bothered to visit a library.
Signed - one with a BS in Geological Engineering and a Master's in categorizing knowledge. However, I do not have a PhD in geochemistry, even though it is offered by dozens of universities. Is that what I need to convince you the field exists?
"Pearls for Swine" - Monty Python
Edited by anglagard, : At this point who cares? How damn stupid can you get?

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 425 by Robert Byers, posted 04-29-2011 2:42 AM Robert Byers has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 432 by Robert Byers, posted 05-04-2011 1:07 AM anglagard has replied

  
anglagard
Member (Idle past 864 days)
Posts: 2339
From: Socorro, New Mexico USA
Joined: 03-18-2006


Message 438 of 445 (615895)
05-18-2011 2:28 AM
Reply to: Message 432 by Robert Byers
05-04-2011 1:07 AM


Re: Take a Hint
Robert Byers writes:
It did turn into a interesting conversation.
i do say the operative word here is CHEMISTRY.
all they did was apply chemial ideas into minor matters of sediment consolidation.
They made a big tent but are wrong to see the real processes of earth sediment as related to special cases of chemistry or bugs making holes in the dirt. I guess they would call that biologicalgeological processes.
Its just bugs and not geology.
Its joining very different subjects together for special investigation.
anglagard writes:
Robert Byers writes:
I use the word forces instead of processes because geology is about results in structures of the earth. Chemical breakdown is so minor in affecting the earth structures that in effect its a atomic process on low power merely breaking things done.
Geology surely is about forces moving things however slow or fast.
Chemistry is on a boundary of the real segregational divisions here.
Chemical break down is trivial as any evidence of earth events and processes of note.
Geology is about pick axes and dynamite. Not test tubes.
They just have to include it in geology class under a big tent because it rides a boundary in a minor way. not the real mccoy as i see it.
The absolute ignorance of this statement leaves me aghast.
Look up the term "geochemistry" in Wikipedia, if you can't be bothered to visit a library.
Signed - one with a BS in Geological Engineering and a Master's in categorizing knowledge. However, I do not have a PhD in geochemistry, even though it is offered by dozens of universities. Is that what I need to convince you the field exists?
"Pearls for Swine" - Monty Python
It did turn into a interesting conversation.
i do say the operative word here is CHEMISTRY.
all they did was apply chemial ideas into minor matters of sediment consolidation.
They made a big tent but are wrong to see the real processes of earth sediment as related to special cases of chemistry or bugs making holes in the dirt. I guess they would call that biologicalgeological processes.
Its just bugs and not geology.
Its joining very different subjects together for special investigation.
I find your response completely incomprehensible, or in the vernacular, what the hell are you going on about?
When I took sedimentology, chemical reactions seemed quite important as to what form the resultant ancient sediment would become.
As for the field of paleontology, you do (or should) recognize that it is not limited to just dinosaurs, it also includes invertebrates, fungi, and bacteria, just as the sedimentology portion of the geosciences includes chemistry, physics, biology, and mathematics (and even English, in nations where it is the primary language).
Edited by anglagard, : Last two paragraphs along with a period that is more properly a comma.
Edited by anglagard, : Proper grammar, best be pure before being critical of others
Edited by anglagard, : third sentence added plus a few phrases

The idea of the sacred is quite simply one of the most conservative notions in any culture, because it seeks to turn other ideas - uncertainty, progress, change - into crimes.
Salman Rushdie
This rudderless world is not shaped by vague metaphysical forces. It is not God who kills the children. Not fate that butchers them or destiny that feeds them to the dogs. It’s us. Only us. - the character Rorschach in Watchmen

This message is a reply to:
 Message 432 by Robert Byers, posted 05-04-2011 1:07 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024