Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,471 Year: 3,728/9,624 Month: 599/974 Week: 212/276 Day: 52/34 Hour: 0/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Flood = many coincidences
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4167 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 317 of 445 (610113)
03-26-2011 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 315 by Robert Byers
03-26-2011 1:39 AM


Robert Byers writes:
it was just a side comment.
Anyways. This creationist sees the k-t line as the flood line. That is that all sedimentary rock and fossils therein are from the collection and deposition of the flood year., The rocks and fossils above this from events a few centuries after the flood.
In fact the acceptance of the k-t line in modern geology and biology has been a great gain to yec creationism or many of us. they did the work to demonstrate a great sudden change in fauna and flora on earth from a disaster.
We just know it was a flood disaster and not a rock from space.
I would love to see some evidence to support what you Know to be true. Please provide me with some links or site something I can look into for myself, instead of sounding like a broken record.
Also see msg 313

This message is a reply to:
 Message 315 by Robert Byers, posted 03-26-2011 1:39 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4167 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 318 of 445 (610114)
03-26-2011 12:08 PM
Reply to: Message 315 by Robert Byers
03-26-2011 1:39 AM


Robert Byers writes:
it was just a side comment.
Anyways. This creationist sees the k-t line as the flood line. That is that all sedimentary rock and fossils therein are from the collection and deposition of the flood year., The rocks and fossils above this from events a few centuries after the flood.
In fact the acceptance of the k-t line in modern geology and biology has been a great gain to yec creationism or many of us. they did the work to demonstrate a great sudden change in fauna and flora on earth from a disaster.
We just know it was a flood disaster and not a rock from space.
I would love to see some evidence to support what you Know to be true. Please provide me with some links or site something I can look into for myself, instead of sounding like a broken record.
Also see msg 313

This message is a reply to:
 Message 315 by Robert Byers, posted 03-26-2011 1:39 AM Robert Byers has not replied

  
fearandloathing
Member (Idle past 4167 days)
Posts: 990
From: Burlington, NC, USA
Joined: 02-24-2011


Message 383 of 445 (612657)
04-17-2011 4:01 PM
Reply to: Message 379 by OliverChant
04-17-2011 3:51 PM


Re: the flood i think was there
OliverChant writes:
Did you know in every major religion in the world it talks about a great flood even the aboriginees in Austrailia,natives in Africa ,Christianity,Judaism,Hinduism and Islam.
Hi oliver, welcome. This is a good place to learn.
Some have argued that the flood story of bible was borrowed from the flood story of Gilgamesh, which is older than the bible.
If there was a global flood then evidence of it would be everywhere. So far in this thread I have seen no credible proof, if you have some please share it.

"I hate to advocate the use of drugs, alcohol, violence, or insanity to anyone, but they always worked for me." - Hunter S. Thompson
Ad astra per aspera

This message is a reply to:
 Message 379 by OliverChant, posted 04-17-2011 3:51 PM OliverChant has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024