quote:
You did not deny that a monopoly exists. But lets face the truth, either you are in the brotherhood or you are on the outside. To be in the brotherhood you are not allowed to speak against what the brotherhood believes to be the truth.
That is so not true!
Science is an extremely competitive and contentious profession. Graduate school and dissertation defense is brutal, peer-review is harsh, standing up and giving a presentation at a conference means that anyone present can,
and is expected to grill you mercilessly.
Thin-skinned people who get upset when their work is criticized and picked apart shouldn't even attempt the field.
The most famous scientists are those who have challenged the prevailing ideas of the time in their fields; Gould and Eldredge and Einstein, for example. Scientists who overlook flaws in their peers' or their own research out of some desire to "not rock the boat" or something would be considered strange indeed and certainly wouldn't have a successful career.
Now, what will be ignored and rejected by the scientific community is ideas which are put forth as scientific but are not actually scientific.
But this is not even relevant to the DI people, including Behe, since none of them have never submitted any research papers to any peer reviewed journal to be considered for publication.
It is a bit rich to accuse the "brotherhood" of scientists of not allowing Behe and other DI folks a place at the table when they don't even show up for dinner.
quote:
Neither does a lot of the notions and beliefs of a lot of other scientist (which becomes their religion) that are being taught in the science classroom as a fact of science.
Such as?