|
Understanding through Discussion |
|
|
Register | Sign In |
|
QuickSearch
| Thread ▼ Details |
|
|
| Author | Topic: ICR Sues Texas | |||||||||||||||||||
|
cavediver Member (Idle past 3671 days)  Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
one piece of evidence is --- gravity. secular science cannot figure it out, cannot solve how it works, cannot provide any evidence for its origin and why it can keep people on earth while holding the moon in place. nor can they explain why the gravitational pull from the sun does NOT rip it out of its orbit with earth.  This is so pathetic and desperate. Except for at the extreme scales that require quantum gravity, we probably understand gravity better than anything else in existence. I would expect a good science-educated 18-year old to be able to explain your above trivial and hilarious confusion. How the hell do you think we manage to navigate probes throughout the solar system with mind-boggling accuracy if we cannot understand how gravity manages to generate both attraction and orbital behaviour? And you call this the "evidence" that scientists reject? Edited by cavediver, : No reason given.
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
cavediver Member (Idle past 3671 days) Posts: 4129 From: UK Joined: |
So ligically,demonstratably and by the rules of evidence, there is evidnce for design, you have simply dismissed in the process what you use without even knowing it still spouting gibberish and trying to claim it as coherent discourse, I see. You do realise that no-one here, especially Percy, thinks for a second you know what you are talking about? How about quitting with the bluster and obfuscations and actually answering some questions. Howz dem axioms doin'?
|
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
Do Nothing Button
Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved
™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024
