The evidence is showing that Buz and Bible or rather Buz via Bible hypothesis, as has been claimed by buzsaw in previous threads, that the first snakes originated on land and had legs is more scientifically correct than the mainline secularist science hypothesis that snakes originated in the sea and evolved into land creatures.
Genesis three, verse fourteen states that the serpent's curse for seducing Eve to disobey God is that the serpent would thereafter be a belly crawler, implying that it was originally created on land with legs.
1. My buzsaw hypothesis on dinos is that they were the pre-cursed serpents. Could this recently found Najash rionegrina legged serpent/snake with hips have been a small dino? If not, why not?
2. Some of the sites that cover this are claiming that this creature crawled on it's belly. As I understand it, the leg fossils are not complete, leaving it a mystery as to how this creature actually motivated. Imo, it is very feasible that it ran about on its two hip reinforced legs as did dinos.
3. Regardless of what anyone can argue, We're moving closer to the buzsaw/Biblical hypothesis and further from the conventional secularist mainline science traditional hypothesis with this discovery.
Are you joking dude?