Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
6 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,820 Year: 4,077/9,624 Month: 948/974 Week: 275/286 Day: 36/46 Hour: 1/7


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Vapour canopy and fountains of the deep
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 43 of 144 (507453)
05-05-2009 8:43 AM
Reply to: Message 41 by RAZD
05-04-2009 8:23 PM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
I have mentioned the 'water canopy' in another thread. Im not YEC btw.
In Genesis 7:11 the expression "floodgates of the heavens" are both used to refer to the great water canopy that was around the earth in suspension and that is described at Genesis 1:6, 7 as "And God went on to say: "Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and let a dividing occur between the waters and the waters." 7Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to make a division between the waters that should be beneath the expanse and the waters that should be above the expanse."
These 'waters' were said to be above the 'expanse'. In Vs 20 the expanse was the area of sky where birds were said to fly. So the water canopy was above the breathable atmosphere...in space.
This would have created a hothouse effect and the earth would have had gorgeous warm climate.
Moveing along to evidence of a warm climate, when scientist examined Ellesmere Island in Canadas Arctic Nthwest they found evidence that North America and Europe were once connected by a land bridge and that the climate in the area was once swampy and temperate.
So lets say the earth was once covered by this canopy as Genesis says, it would certainly explain how the arctic regions were once warm climates.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 41 by RAZD, posted 05-04-2009 8:23 PM RAZD has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 44 by bluescat48, posted 05-05-2009 9:15 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 45 by Percy, posted 05-05-2009 9:34 AM Peg has replied
 Message 74 by RAZD, posted 05-06-2009 7:59 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 63 of 144 (507546)
05-06-2009 4:33 AM
Reply to: Message 45 by Percy
05-05-2009 9:34 AM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Hi percy,
I dont know how the water vapor remained aloft, but certainly it takes heat the keep water vaporised. The upper regions of the atmosphere (thermosphere) is at a high enough temperature to keep the water vaporised. Also we know that water vapor is lighter than air and other gases making up the atmosphere. So there is thus nothing physically impossible about thermal vapor blanket existing in the upper atmosphere.
It actually would explain quite a lot in terms of the warm climate that the frozen arctic areas once enjoyed.
The atmosphere on Mars has small traces of water vapor which are somehow suspended. Another reason not to doubt the validity of the claim that the earth may have had a water vapor at one time.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 45 by Percy, posted 05-05-2009 9:34 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 64 by Huntard, posted 05-06-2009 5:27 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 65 by Percy, posted 05-06-2009 8:20 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 66 by Rahvin, posted 05-06-2009 1:48 PM Peg has replied
 Message 67 by Son, posted 05-06-2009 2:11 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 81 of 144 (507655)
05-07-2009 6:33 AM
Reply to: Message 66 by Rahvin
05-06-2009 1:48 PM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Rahvin writes:
Unfortunately, as has been mentioned, the upper atmosphere is too sparse to actually contain much water - and the water molecules at that height are subjected to high-energy particles that "crack" H2O into bare Hydrogen and Oxygen atoms.
is it possible that the water vapor existed in the form of Hydrogen and Oxygen gas?
Rahvin writes:
But more importantly, we've already established that there is insufficient water on the Earth to account for a global Flood. If there were such a canopy, and there were such a Flood - where did the water go?
There is more earth below sea level then there is above it. So couldnt the water still be here on earth?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 66 by Rahvin, posted 05-06-2009 1:48 PM Rahvin has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 82 by Percy, posted 05-07-2009 8:35 AM Peg has replied
 Message 83 by lyx2no, posted 05-07-2009 9:17 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 84 of 144 (507772)
05-08-2009 12:30 AM
Reply to: Message 82 by Percy
05-07-2009 8:35 AM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Percy writes:
In other words, you're asking us if we can prove something impossible.
its not impossible to know how much land is beneath the seas.
quote:
The features of continental landscapes are mirrored by similar features on the ocean basins. Plateaus, plains, valleys, rolling hills, and volcanic cones and mountains are found beneath the waters of the oceans, just as they are on dry land. Yet the largest underwater mountains are higher than those on the continents, and underwater plains are flatter and more extensive than their dry counterparts. These "oceanscapes," at one time unseen and unknown, may resemble familiar landscapes, but on a much grander scale.
No webpage found at provided URL: http://www.scienceclarified.com/landforms/Ocean-Basins-to-Volcanoes/Ocean-Basin.html
Science has revealed that there IS much more land beneath the seas then there is above it.
The water must have come from somewhere. Oxygen and Hydrogen dont just mix together to become water...it takes vasts amounts of energy to create water...so much energy that scientists cannot produce enough energy to create water from the two gasses according to my husband who happens to be one of you evc science ppl.
So if science is going to assume that it just exists, then its no different to be accepting that God created it and put it there.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 82 by Percy, posted 05-07-2009 8:35 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 87 by anglagard, posted 05-08-2009 1:20 AM Peg has replied
 Message 89 by PaulK, posted 05-08-2009 1:31 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 97 by Percy, posted 05-08-2009 8:37 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 105 by Percy, posted 05-08-2009 4:48 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 85 of 144 (507774)
05-08-2009 12:41 AM
Reply to: Message 83 by lyx2no
05-07-2009 9:17 AM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
lyx2no writes:
The gasses of the thermosphere are so tenuous and any separated hydrogen is so kinetically energetic there is nearly nothing to stop it from being lost to space
Jupiter and Saturn both have a thick atmosphere composed of mostly hydrogen and helium....why dont these gasses get lost in space?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 83 by lyx2no, posted 05-07-2009 9:17 AM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 86 by anglagard, posted 05-08-2009 1:13 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 88 by lyx2no, posted 05-08-2009 1:28 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 90 of 144 (507782)
05-08-2009 2:05 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by anglagard
05-08-2009 1:20 AM


Re: Troll Alert?
anglagard writes:
This reaction does not require a lot of energy, but I'll bet you would see it sure does produce a lot of energy, provided you survived the explosion of course.
you're right
this is getting ridiculous! Such water shortages on earth and scientists can readily make water
why arent they doing that??? Did someone not say the magic word?
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by anglagard, posted 05-08-2009 1:20 AM anglagard has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 93 by Adminnemooseus, posted 05-08-2009 2:57 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 94 by Son, posted 05-08-2009 3:38 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 91 of 144 (507783)
05-08-2009 2:15 AM
Reply to: Message 88 by lyx2no
05-08-2009 1:28 AM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
lyx2no writes:
The only source for the water would be a miracle. And miracles are not subject to cause and effect, and need leave no evidence of their happening. That may be the reason that God had to tell us about it instead of there being plentiful evidence that we might see for ourselves.
thats where I differ because i see that 70% of the earth is covered by water and I look at that as evidence of the earth being flooded by water.
Like i said, i dont know how the water vapor was kept aloft according to Genesis, and doesnt concern me that I dont know how such things happened, instead i accept that it happened because God has the power to do it.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 88 by lyx2no, posted 05-08-2009 1:28 AM lyx2no has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 92 by Taz, posted 05-08-2009 2:24 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 95 by Huntard, posted 05-08-2009 3:54 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 104 by lyx2no, posted 05-08-2009 1:19 PM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 107 of 144 (507938)
05-09-2009 5:02 AM
Reply to: Message 100 by Percy
05-08-2009 10:16 AM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Percy writes:
The advantage of answering questions like the water/hydrogen issue is that Peg will (hopefully) learn something about the availability of free hydrogen. Undoubtedly she has never heard of the speculations about a hydrogen economy where cars would be powered by hydrogen instead of petrol (or do they say gasoline in Australia?). Clearly if you can power a car with hydrogen then its combustion with oxygen must produce a great deal of energy, as people have been trying to make clear to Peg with examples like the Hindenberg (about which Peg again apparently knows nothing). Most doubts about the possibility of a hydrogen economy stem from the great amounts of energy needed just to create free hydrogen, and Peg doesn't understand this yet, and so doesn't understand that countries like Saudi Arabia cannot solve their water problems by simply making water from free hydrogen and oxygen.
which was entirely my point if anyone had bothered to read my post properly in the first place
I asked a question in msg 81 (forgive me if thats inappropriate)
quote:
is it possible that the water vapor existed in the form of Hydrogen and Oxygen gas?
lyx2no replied with :
"The gasses of the thermosphere are so tenuous and any separated hydrogen is so kinetically energetic there is nearly nothing to stop it from being lost to space."
So i asked why Jupiter and Saturn have such a gaseous atmosphere to which Anglegard spewed forth a diatribe of 'Oh for christs sake...bla bla bla troll bla bla bla"
Good one. Its good to see maturity on evc.
My point about water was that: "Oxygen and Hydrogen dont just mix together to become water...it takes vasts amounts of energy to create water...so much energy that scientists cannot produce enough energy to create water"
Anglagard disagreed because she did not read my post correctly. I said nothing about hydrogen and oxygen not creating energy...I said they "dont just combine to create WATER, without vast amounts of energy"
it seems to be what you are saying here
Percy writes:
Most doubts about the possibility of a hydrogen economy stem from the great amounts of energy needed just to create free hydrogen, and Peg doesn't understand this yet, and so doesn't understand that countries like Saudi Arabia cannot solve their water problems by simply making water from free hydrogen and oxygen.
.
I certainly do understand that we cannot produce water. My reply to Anglegard in msg 90 was sarcasm.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 100 by Percy, posted 05-08-2009 10:16 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 112 by Dr Adequate, posted 05-09-2009 5:31 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 132 by anglagard, posted 05-10-2009 1:31 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 108 of 144 (507940)
05-09-2009 5:05 AM
Reply to: Message 99 by Percy
05-08-2009 9:36 AM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
Percy writes:
I think the weight of a vapor canopy that was at very high altitude because of its temperature would still rest on the underlying layers and thus still produce a crushing weight on life at the earth's surface.
have scientists ever tried to create such an experiment to see what the effects would be?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 99 by Percy, posted 05-08-2009 9:36 AM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 126 by lyx2no, posted 05-09-2009 10:24 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 131 by JonF, posted 05-09-2009 4:51 PM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 109 of 144 (507941)
05-09-2009 5:10 AM
Reply to: Message 104 by lyx2no
05-08-2009 1:19 PM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
lyx2no writes:
Again, Peg, no you don't. You're trying to explain the suspension of 6108 cubic miles of water above the surface of the Earth in some rational way,
water in what form? Water is 2 parts hydrogen to one part oxygen yes?
The vapor could have existed in gas form in the atmosphere just like they do on other planets...why is this impossible?
(btw im not saying that this is what the bible says...im speculating)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 104 by lyx2no, posted 05-08-2009 1:19 PM lyx2no has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 110 by Huntard, posted 05-09-2009 5:23 AM Peg has replied
 Message 111 by Percy, posted 05-09-2009 5:28 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 113 of 144 (507950)
05-09-2009 6:02 AM
Reply to: Message 105 by Percy
05-08-2009 4:48 PM


Re: bump for creationist contribution
Percy writes:
First, you've probably misunderstood your husband. He probably didn't say it takes vast amounts of energy to create water. Either he said it takes vast amounts of energy to separate water into hydrogen and oxygen, or that combining hydrogen and oxygen into water with a tiny spark produces vast amounts of energy
We were discussing water shortages and my suggestion was simple. Why cant we create more water by combine Hydrogen and Oxygen?
He said that the energy needed to make even a small amount of water would be too great and therefore not worth the effort which is why they are not even attempting it.
Percy writes:
Second, when you say that your husband is one of "you evc science ppl", do you mean he's familiar with science, or is he actually a participating member here?
both...he hasnt posted recently though.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 105 by Percy, posted 05-08-2009 4:48 PM Percy has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 118 by Son, posted 05-09-2009 7:12 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 114 of 144 (507951)
05-09-2009 6:05 AM
Reply to: Message 110 by Huntard
05-09-2009 5:23 AM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
Huntard writes:
It's not impossible as is. However, have you got ANY idea of the volume that gas would have, and have you ANY idea of the incredible amounts of energy that would be released when these gasses were mixed to make water?
I'm sure you know what happens if you put hydrogen an oxygen in a jar, shake it up a bit open the lid and light a match, no? Well, it gives quite a big boom, and creates the water you need. Now, do this for the vast quantities of these two gases, and what do you get? Yes, a disintegrated Earth!*
*Probably an exaggeration, but it would most certainly kill everything and anything.
Ah right I see what you mean now. Although im not convinced that God does not have the power to control such forces and release such energy safely.
So then we are back to the original question of how the water vapor may have existed in the atmosphere...what other possibilities are there?
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 110 by Huntard, posted 05-09-2009 5:23 AM Huntard has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 122 by Huntard, posted 05-09-2009 9:28 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 115 of 144 (507952)
05-09-2009 6:09 AM
Reply to: Message 111 by Percy
05-09-2009 5:28 AM


Re: Up, Up, and Away
Percy writes:
Peg, are you operating under the belief that when water evaporates into the atmosphere that it becomes hydrogen and oxygen?
no of course not.
I asked that because you mentioned (msg 45) that, as water vapor, it would have been too heavy to stay in the atmosphere.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 111 by Percy, posted 05-09-2009 5:28 AM Percy has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 119 by Percy, posted 05-09-2009 8:30 AM Peg has not replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 116 of 144 (507953)
05-09-2009 6:51 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by RAZD
05-06-2009 7:59 PM


Re: fishing for facts
Hi Razd,
sorry i missed this earlier.
RAZD writes:
Does the bible actually say this verbatim or is this just an assumption that people have made?
Yes the bible does say that the earth was surrounded by water.
Genesis 1:6 "Let an expanse come to be in between the waters and let a dividing occur between the waters and the waters." 7Then God proceeded to make the expanse and to make a division between the waters that should be beneath the expanse and the waters that should be above the expanse. And it came to be so.
The waters "beneath" the atmospheric "expanse" were the waters on the surface of the earth. Whereas, "the waters ... above the expanse" were vast quantities of moisture suspended high above the area where birds were later said to fly. There is no mentions of the form of the water or how they were kept in place, just that they were there.
Christian writers also wrote that the earth was surrounded by water.
2Peter 3:5 "...there were heavens from of old and an earth standing compactly out of water and in the midst of water by the word of God; 6and by those [means] the world of that time suffered destruction when it was deluged with water"
Here peter is confirming the Genesis account of an earth being surrounded by water before it was deluged.
RAZD writes:
Strangely, I see no evidence of water being in a "canopy" around the earth, as there are plenty of places in the rest of the universe for the divided waters to exist without needing a single drop in any canopy. To say there is water in space is one thing, to say it was formed in a canopy needs a specific reference to that effect, otherwise it is just speculation, conjecture, fiction.
You're right, we have a dilemma in that we dont see any evidence of water around the earth because its not there. If we believe the bible account, then we have to assume that the water that used to be the canopy is now located in the seas.
The question really is 'Could' the water in the sea have come from the upper region of the atmosphere?
Its not something we can prove nor disprove.
However there is evidence of a time when the oceans were smaller and the continents were larger than they are now, eg river channels extending far out under the oceans. This must surely tell us that there was less water on earth at one time.
So where did all this additional water come from?
RAZD writes:
Curiously, we are looking at global warming producing an earth with a "gorgeous warm climate" using only a little increase in cloud cover. Increasing the volume of water above that creates lethal conditions for many organisms, including humans (look at the increase in deaths during any heat wave in any country now).
this is going off topic a little...but its a warm humid climate as opposed to a dry hot climate such as today. Besides, the global warming is not being caused by water, its being caused by carbon dioxide and other harmful substances. We cant compare apples with oranges.
RAZD writes:
Interestingly, they also found that the shape of the continents at that time was significantly different, and that there location relative to the axis of rotation was significantly different -- enough so that the conditions on Ellesmere Island (where Tiktaalik was found) are readily explained with today's climate in similar places relative to the axis of rotation today. No need for any "gorgeous warming" to explain those conditions.
this still doesnt explain why there was a land bride that connected the continents that is no longer there... perhaps it was the additional water that moved the continent...something pretty powerful must have caused it to rotate.
Edited by Peg, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by RAZD, posted 05-06-2009 7:59 PM RAZD has seen this message but not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by Coyote, posted 05-09-2009 7:10 AM Peg has replied
 Message 123 by subbie, posted 05-09-2009 9:51 AM Peg has not replied
 Message 124 by Huntard, posted 05-09-2009 9:54 AM Peg has replied

  
Peg
Member (Idle past 4956 days)
Posts: 2703
From: melbourne, australia
Joined: 11-22-2008


Message 120 of 144 (507962)
05-09-2009 8:40 AM
Reply to: Message 117 by Coyote
05-09-2009 7:10 AM


Re: fishing for excuses
Coyote writes:
Re: your past several posts.
Peg, science is not your forte. Give it up.
I cant give up what i didnt take up.
Im not attempting to prove my beliefs with science here. I'm throwing around 'could be's' because i dont believe that science is a closed book. I beleive there is still much that is unknown and still much to learn. Of course I believe the bible and i believe that the earth was surrounded by water because the bible says so. The bible does not attempt to explain it scientifically because thats not its purpose, but i dont think it can be written off as false simply because it cant be measured.
Perhaps one day someone will work out how the water vapor stayed in the atmosphere.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by Coyote, posted 05-09-2009 7:10 AM Coyote has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024