|
Author
|
Topic: Status Report: The Invulnerable Refutation of Darwinism
|
Cold Foreign Object 
Suspended Member (Idle past 3066 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
|
Message 61 of 93 (478907)
08-21-2008 9:57 PM
|
Reply to: Message 57 by mark24
08-21-2008 5:54 PM
|
|
I'd rather masturbate than be a dumbfuck. I don't believe you. Ray
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 57 by mark24, posted 08-21-2008 5:54 PM | | mark24 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 63 by Granny Magda, posted 08-21-2008 10:24 PM | | Cold Foreign Object has replied |
|
subbie
Member (Idle past 1273 days) Posts: 3509 Joined: 02-26-2006
|
quote:
We have no idea as to what you are talking about.
We? I think they need to step up the voltage on your shock treatments, mate. And I think so, too.
Those who would sacrifice an essential liberty for a temporary security will lose both, and deserve neither. -- Benjamin Franklin We see monsters where science shows us windmills. -- Phat
|
Granny Magda
Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: 11-12-2007 Member Rating: 3.8
|
What's the Point?
CFO writes: mark24 writes: I'd rather masturbate than be a dumbfuck. I don't believe you. Ray Bloody hell, really? If you honestly can't work out why someone would prefer masturbating to being dumb, you need to masturbate more often. I mean it, go have one now. It might just calm you down a bit. In fact, I can't help but speculate that this might just be the reason why you're always so angry. Seriously though Ray, what exactly are you trying to achieve by posting this thread? We already know that you're working on your magnum opus. You've said already. We know, the folks at TalkOrigins know, the folks at AnswersinGenesis know, the folks at Fundies Say the Darndest Things know (well, the ones who don't think you're a parody at least)... We already know you're writing a world conquering paper. This is not new information. Tell us when you're finished. You must have known that people would use this thread as an opportunity to rip the piss out of you. I am left wondering if that is the point; you proffer your backside, specifically so that it can be kicked and you can collect some more stigmata from your holy battle with the Evilutionist Conspiracy. I can't help feeling that your time could be better spent. 
Mutate and Survive
|
Coyote
Member (Idle past 2124 days) Posts: 6117 Joined: 01-12-2008
|
Simply wrong
The scientific method is first and foremost observation. You are silently alluding to testability and the false assumption that Creationism-Design to fail in this crucial respect. Of course evolution is not testable in the way that you claim it to be. This is supported by the fact that evolution is an interpretation of evidence. This means evolutionists are running a rigged lottery since the interpretation is not subject falsification----not ever, but it is misrepresented to be just that. The only aspect of evolution that is truly on the table, eligible for falsification, revision, or modification, is causation and tempo. But the explanation or interpretation of evidence in favor of perpetual transmutation producing common ancestry is off the table and not subject to falsification or revision. You are so far wrong its not even worth discussing. Is your entire "treatise" going to be done on this level? Shouldn't you even have some knowledge of how science works if you are purporting to make an argument that affects science? (And see tagline...)
Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.
|
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4208 days) Posts: 2347 From: United States Joined: 10-06-2007
|
Re: Dumfuckistan
"What is something that a double agent would say?" Alex: "correct....please select again." off topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002 Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
|
Granny Magda
Member Posts: 2462 From: UK Joined: 11-12-2007 Member Rating: 3.8
|
Re: Dumfuckistan
There is a topic?! 
Mutate and Survive
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 65 by bluescat48, posted 08-21-2008 11:51 PM | | bluescat48 has not replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 67 by Larni, posted 08-22-2008 3:49 AM | | Granny Magda has not replied |
|
Larni
Member (Idle past 182 days) Posts: 4000 From: Liverpool Joined: 09-16-2005
|
Re: Dumfuckistan
Isn't it to guess when Ray starts frothing? He's got to be near now, a few more prods....
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 66 by Granny Magda, posted 08-22-2008 12:39 AM | | Granny Magda has not replied |
|
Adminnemooseus
Administrator Posts: 3974 Joined: 09-26-2002
|
|
|
Message 68 of 93 (478930)
08-22-2008 4:05 AM
|
|
|
OK, time to back down a bit
I agree with what was said in message 63:
Seriously though Ray, what exactly are you trying to achieve by posting this thread? We already know that you're working on your magnum opus. You've said already. We know, the folks at TalkOrigins know, the folks at AnswersinGenesis know, the folks at Fundies Say the Darndest Things know (well, the ones who don't think you're a parody at least)... We already know you're writing a world conquering paper. This is not new information. Tell us when you're finished. You must have known that people would use this thread as an opportunity to rip the piss out of you. I am left wondering if that is the point; you proffer your backside, specifically so that it can be kicked and you can collect some more stigmata from your holy battle with the Evilutionist Conspiracy. When Ray's topic first showed up, I was thinking that he might as well of titled it "Please Kick Me". Seemed to be totally pointless other than to provoke others to heap abuse. It, however, is now time to cool things off. Ray's been kicked enough. Maybe time to instead pelt him with marshmallows. Or something like that. Please, no replies to this message. Adminnemooseus
Admin writes: It really helps moderators figure out if a topic is disintegrating because of general misbehavior versus someone in particular if the originally non-misbehaving members kept it that way. When everyone is prickly and argumentative and off-topic and personal then it's just too difficult to tell. We have neither infinite time to untie the Gordian knot, nor the wisdom of Solomon. There used to be a comedian who presented his ideas for a better world, and one of them was to arm everyone on the highway with little rubber dart guns. Every time you see a driver doing something stupid, you fire a little dart at his car. When a state trooper sees someone driving down the highway with a bunch of darts all over his car he pulls him over for being an idiot. Please make it easy to tell you apart from the idiots. Source
|
Brian
Member (Idle past 4978 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: 10-22-2002
|
evolution, since Darwin, says mankind evolved from an ancient ape ancestor that lived millions of years ago. Ancestor of apes or an ancestor that was an ape? When you claim this in your thesis Ray, what is the reference that you supply to support it?
|
dokukaeru
Member (Idle past 4633 days) Posts: 129 From: ohio Joined: 06-27-2008
|
Nice to meet you Ray
Hi Ray, nice to meet you. I am somewhat new to this forum, so I do not know your history here. Could you please elaborate a little on the scientific evidence you have discovered that falsifies evolution? It has been almost 150 years and still not one single piece of evidence that falsifies evolution. With that being said, you can see why I( and everyone else here) am very eager to see this evidence of the falsification of evolution. Thanks in advance, Joe
|
mark24
Member (Idle past 5214 days) Posts: 3857 From: UK Joined: 12-01-2001
|
|
|
Message 71 of 93 (478943)
08-22-2008 10:10 AM
|
Reply to: Message 70 by dokukaeru
08-22-2008 8:09 AM
|
|
Re: Nice to meet you Ray
Dokukaero,
Could you please elaborate a little on the scientific evidence you have discovered that falsifies evolution? None, he fails on the title of his paper. If knowledge is invulnerable is isn't science. Mark
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 70 by dokukaeru, posted 08-22-2008 8:09 AM | | dokukaeru has not replied |
|
Cold Foreign Object
Suspended Member (Idle past 3066 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
|
|
Message 72 of 93 (478948)
08-22-2008 1:59 PM
|
Reply to: Message 69 by Brian
08-22-2008 6:00 AM
|
|
Ancestor of apes or an ancestor that was an ape? When you claim this in your thesis Ray, what is the reference that you supply to support it? Charles Darwin: "We thus learn that man is descended from a hairy quadruped, furnished with a tail and pointed ears, probably arboreal in its habits, and an inhabitant of the Old World. This creature, if its whole structure had been examined by a naturalist, would have been classed amongst the Quadrumana, as surely as would the common and still more ancient progenitor of the Old and New World monkeys" (Descent Of Man 1871:389, Vol.2). Are you claiming that you did not know that evolutionary theory claims mankind to descend from the lower animals, apes, "hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears? Are you claiming not to know that idiots with shovels have been digging in Africa for decades convinced that man evolved from an ape-like creature that lived millions of years ago? Since the implication is unavoidable (gutter racism) I can understand why you might be feigning ignorance about the main claim of evolution concerning the origin of mankind. Ray
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 69 by Brian, posted 08-22-2008 6:00 AM | | Brian has replied |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 73 by Chiroptera, posted 08-22-2008 2:05 PM | | Cold Foreign Object has not replied | | | Message 74 by Brian, posted 08-22-2008 3:24 PM | | Cold Foreign Object has replied | | | Message 91 by Larni, posted 08-23-2008 5:49 AM | | Cold Foreign Object has not replied |
|
Chiroptera
Inactive Member
|
hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears Um, cats are hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears. Maybe Darwin was saying humans evolved from cats.
Speaking personally, I find few things more awesome than contemplating this vast and majestic process of evolution, the ebb and flow of successive biotas through geological time. Creationists and others who cannot for ideological or religious reasons accept the fact of evolution miss out a great deal, and are left with a claustrophobic little universe in which nothing happens and nothing changes. -- M. Alan Kazlev
|
Brian
Member (Idle past 4978 days) Posts: 4659 From: Scotland Joined: 10-22-2002
|
Are you claiming that you did not know that evolutionary theory claims mankind to descend from the lower animals, apes, "hairy quadruped-tail-pointed ears? I am claiming that evolutionary theory doesn't claim that mankind descended from apes, I always thought that mankind and apes shared a common ancestor, an 'ape-like' creature, which is what you are now claiming too.
Are you claiming not to know that idiots with shovels have been digging in Africa for decades convinced that man evolved from an ape-like creature that lived millions of years ago? Is an 'ape like' creature an 'ape'?
Since the implication is unavoidable (gutter racism) That's rich coming from a follower of a faith that is proud of its attempted genocides.
I can understand why you might be feigning ignorance about the main claim of evolution concerning the origin of mankind. I wasn't feigning anything, it is just that your claim for evolutionary theory is different from what science says about evolution. So, does science say we evolved from apes or an 'ape like' creature?
|
Cold Foreign Object
Suspended Member (Idle past 3066 days) Posts: 3417 Joined: 11-21-2003
|
Re: Dumfuckistan
off topic!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! This comment acknowledges defeat in our exchanges and attempts to signal a Moderator to provide some satisfaction on the intellect who beat him up. Ray
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 65 by bluescat48, posted 08-21-2008 11:51 PM | | bluescat48 has not replied |
|
™ Version 4.2