Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,411 Year: 3,668/9,624 Month: 539/974 Week: 152/276 Day: 26/23 Hour: 2/4


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Does The Flood Add up?
CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 66 of 298 (307998)
04-30-2006 5:20 PM
Reply to: Message 65 by inkorrekt
04-30-2006 5:18 PM


Re: Evidence for Noah's ark
quote:
You cannot compare Noah's ark with such information which are yet to be verified. Noah's ark will one day be verified and authenticated. Till then, we cannot prejudge anything.
eh? You don't see the problem with this statement?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 65 by inkorrekt, posted 04-30-2006 5:18 PM inkorrekt has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 69 of 298 (308040)
04-30-2006 6:57 PM
Reply to: Message 68 by inkorrekt
04-30-2006 6:48 PM


Re: Evidence for Noah's ark
But you know that an argument to the future is no argument at all? It's a bit bizarre to tell people not to prejudge and then in the previous sentence talk about how the ark will be verified!!
This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 30-Apr-2006 07:04 PM

This message is a reply to:
 Message 68 by inkorrekt, posted 04-30-2006 6:48 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 74 by inkorrekt, posted 05-01-2006 10:30 PM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 76 of 298 (308391)
05-02-2006 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 74 by inkorrekt
05-01-2006 10:30 PM


Re: Evidence for Noah's ark
em...yes? I read it - it just says "I have an argument that I might be able to present in the future but at this present moment, I have nil, nothing,zippo!"

This message is a reply to:
 Message 74 by inkorrekt, posted 05-01-2006 10:30 PM inkorrekt has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 88 of 298 (316496)
05-31-2006 4:44 AM
Reply to: Message 87 by arachnophilia
05-31-2006 4:23 AM


Re: A small point
Who did they breed with?
Did they take wives on the ark?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 87 by arachnophilia, posted 05-31-2006 4:23 AM arachnophilia has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 89 by arachnophilia, posted 05-31-2006 5:19 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 154 of 298 (326335)
06-26-2006 7:35 AM
Reply to: Message 153 by Randy
06-26-2006 6:42 AM


Re: What's the density of hay (or how big/heavy is a bale)?
Randy I was reading your old thread here:
http://EvC Forum: Biogeography falsifies the worldwide flood. -->EvC Forum: Biogeography falsifies the worldwide flood.
Anyone who hasn't read that thread should.
I don't mean to be cruel to anyone but if you can get through the whole thread without bursting out laughing you are a better person than me. The conversation that Randy has with the Golfer is pure comedy gold.
Edited by CK, : added "person".

This message is a reply to:
 Message 153 by Randy, posted 06-26-2006 6:42 AM Randy has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 156 of 298 (326339)
06-26-2006 8:07 AM
Reply to: Message 155 by nator
06-26-2006 8:03 AM


Re: OK, here are some figures
We should draw up a table for future reference.
So far we have
2 Horses - 4,380 gallons of drinking water and 11,000 pounds of hay.
Anyone have any handy figures for any other animals?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 155 by nator, posted 06-26-2006 8:03 AM nator has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 181 by MangyTiger, posted 06-26-2006 8:04 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 168 of 298 (326506)
06-26-2006 3:14 PM
Reply to: Message 167 by Faith
06-26-2006 3:09 PM


Re: What's the density of hay (or how big/heavy is a bale)?
What's a Kind?
I've never seen an explanation that makes any sense, what's is yours?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 167 by Faith, posted 06-26-2006 3:09 PM Faith has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 177 by arachnophilia, posted 06-26-2006 5:43 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 174 of 298 (326533)
06-26-2006 5:09 PM
Reply to: Message 171 by ringo
06-26-2006 4:19 PM


Why do we even HAVE A flood? why doesn't god just *poof* all the evilinessenessness and evil people out of the way?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 171 by ringo, posted 06-26-2006 4:19 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 175 by lfen, posted 06-26-2006 5:19 PM CK has not replied
 Message 178 by ringo, posted 06-26-2006 5:48 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 183 of 298 (326626)
06-26-2006 8:32 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by Coragyps
06-26-2006 8:30 PM


Re: OK, here are some figures
I need to goto bed after some good Alan Moore news but I have an idea that we can put into practice tomorrow.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by Coragyps, posted 06-26-2006 8:30 PM Coragyps has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 221 of 298 (328418)
07-03-2006 5:02 AM
Reply to: Message 220 by Faith
07-03-2006 4:52 AM


quote:
The continents split some time after the flood.
Let me get this straight - the earth is about 4,500 years old and we had time for a flood and then some time after the continents split?
Honestly?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 220 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 4:52 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 223 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 5:06 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 227 of 298 (328425)
07-03-2006 5:31 AM
Reply to: Message 215 by Faith
07-03-2006 3:57 AM


quote:
Yes, there is really no problem with the idea that human populations grew very quickly. A little basic math can show how many in a short time
Great - let's see it - turn 8 people into 4 billion in 4,500 years.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 215 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 3:57 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 229 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 5:35 AM CK has replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 231 of 298 (328429)
07-03-2006 5:39 AM
Reply to: Message 229 by Faith
07-03-2006 5:35 AM


quote:
Oh it can be done. Fiddle with it yourself a little. Maybe I'll get to it later.
Why should I answer it ? It just appears to be another in a long line of "it's simple if you just handwave and don't actually answer the question" answers from you.
If you want to suggest it's possible YOU work out the answer.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 229 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 5:35 AM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 234 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 6:11 AM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 253 of 298 (328581)
07-03-2006 2:32 PM


Have I left anything out
Let's see how much of this I get -
about 4,500 years ago Noah built an ark. He then collected all of the kinds that needed to go on the ark. Some of those kinds (20,000 or so is the number generally given) were dinosaurs but it was thought those were eggs. He also was able to pack all the food needed for all the kinds and also he wasn't worried about the vastly different climates and habits of those animals as they were far more hardy than modern animals. Then over the course of about a year Noah and 7 others were able to care for all 20,000 of those animals. Noah wasn't that worried about waste as he had a pump that he managed to construct 1000s of years before it was invented. (He also wasn't bothered about breathing steam or the fact that the oceans would have boiled off but I disgress) Then all the animals got off the ark and we had hyper-evolution for the next 4000 years to leave us with the wildlife we see today. At the same time the 8 people on the ark over a period of 4000 or so years turned into 4 billion people.
THEN the continents separated......
Edited by CK, : No reason given.

Six Pack writes:
An' I say "equate THIS, Master of Apokolips".. an' I smash him inna the face with a bottle've tequila! Sixpack encounters Darkseid

Replies to this message:
 Message 257 by Randy, posted 07-03-2006 2:52 PM CK has not replied
 Message 284 by MangyTiger, posted 07-04-2006 2:57 PM CK has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 256 of 298 (328584)
07-03-2006 2:39 PM
Reply to: Message 254 by Faith
07-03-2006 2:33 PM


Re: A small point
Faith writes:
NOW. The past is a different story. Of course with the uniformitarian assumption the whole thing is impossible. But we YECs don't operate by that assumption. We have a completely other model in mind.
I've seen it - it's not very descriptive

This message is a reply to:
 Message 254 by Faith, posted 07-03-2006 2:33 PM Faith has not replied

CK
Member (Idle past 4149 days)
Posts: 3221
Joined: 07-04-2004


Message 287 of 298 (328795)
07-04-2006 3:09 PM
Reply to: Message 286 by Faith
07-04-2006 3:02 PM


Re: tectonic plate movement
quote:
In any case my assumptions are based on God's revelations and nothing so flimsy as a scientific theory.
So why do you keep need to be reminded that you are wasting your time and that of everyone else in the Science forum. Do you have a specific learning difficulty? I struggle to understand why you are unable to grasp what discussion are about in the science forums?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 286 by Faith, posted 07-04-2006 3:02 PM Faith has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 290 by Faith, posted 07-04-2006 3:21 PM CK has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024