Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9163 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,421 Year: 3,678/9,624 Month: 549/974 Week: 162/276 Day: 2/34 Hour: 2/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Barbarity of Christianity (as compared to Islam)
ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 116 of 299 (334902)
07-24-2006 2:38 PM
Reply to: Message 115 by randman
07-24-2006 2:14 PM


Re: jar is clear here on another thread
randman writes:
jar does indeed think of Jesus as not Christian
Well, of course Jesus was not a Christian.
How could He be? If He followed Himself, He'd be chasing His tail.
This thread is (supposed to be) about the "barbarity" of Christianity. The OP (which in my opinion is extremely thin) says:
quote:
Jar wants an opportunity to prove that Christians are just as barbarous as Muslims.
The assumption is that Islam is barbarous and the question is, "Does Christianity rise as high on the barbarity scale as Islam?"
If anybody has a right to be offended, it is the Muslims.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 115 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 2:14 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 117 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 3:23 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 123 of 299 (334927)
07-24-2006 3:55 PM
Reply to: Message 117 by randman
07-24-2006 3:23 PM


English 101
randman writes:
... it's all about "the most violent, intolerant force on earth", but that doesn't mean jar has ever called Christianity evil...
Well, different words have different meanings. The thread is about "barbarity", which may or may not include "violence" and/or "intolerance". You are the one who is equating "barbarity" with "evil" - nobody else is.
But the topic here, if you'd care to address it at all, is comparing Christianity with Islam. Stop wasting time quibbling over words. What acts have Muslims done that Christians have never done?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 117 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 3:23 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 124 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 4:05 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 127 of 299 (334941)
07-24-2006 4:38 PM
Reply to: Message 124 by randman
07-24-2006 4:05 PM


randman writes:
Consider, btw, another comment from jar
No.
I'm only interested in discussing the topic: What, if anything, have Muslims done that Christians have not also done?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 124 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 4:05 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 128 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 4:48 PM ringo has replied
 Message 129 by jar, posted 07-24-2006 4:51 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 133 of 299 (334958)
07-24-2006 5:06 PM
Reply to: Message 128 by randman
07-24-2006 4:48 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
randman writes:
The question implies a false assumption, namely that if Christians have not refrained from ever committing the same acts of barbarity as Muslims, then somehow they are the same.
If Christians have committed the same acts as Muslims, then they are the same.
The question ignores scope.
Scope is irrelevant. One murder is no less barbaric than mass-murder.
The question ignores motive.
Motive is irrelevant. One motive for murder is as barbaric as the next.
If the act is not religiously motivated, then does it belong in the discussion?
It is not possible to determine the exact motivation for acts committed far in the past. Only the acts themselves are relevant to this discussion.
The question fails to really detail what is a Christian or Muslim.
You can't use the No-True-Christian fallacy or the No-True-Muslim fallacy to weasel out of the discussion. You seem to want to say that anybody who commits barbaric acts is No-True-Christian and anybody who doesn't commit barbaric acts is No-True-Muslim.
For the purposes of this discussion, anybody who calls himself a Christian is a Christian and anybody who calls himself a Muslim is a Muslim.
Start with some examples: What have Muslims done that you call "barbaric" that no Christian has ever done?
Edited by Ringo, : Promoted "muslim" to "Muslim".

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 128 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 4:48 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 134 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 5:23 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 135 of 299 (334966)
07-24-2006 5:44 PM
Reply to: Message 134 by randman
07-24-2006 5:23 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
randman writes:
The religions, however, are different.
We're trying to compare the two religions, in terms of barbarity. The only way to do that is to look at individual acts of barbarism by individual members of both religions.
Mass murder is more barbaric than a single murder.
Then what scale do you use to measure barbarity? If a Christian murders one person, is that more acceptable than a Muslim murdering two?
But it doesn't really matter. Use examples of either individual murders or mass maurders if you like.
So a Christian murders for some non-religious reason, as David did out of lust for Bathsheba, and a Muslim kills in order to gain entrance into heaven, and you don't see the difference?
I doubt that the families of the victims would see much difference.
But it doesn't really matter. Use only religiously-motivated examples if you like.
Are we talking about people or religion here?
As I suggested, without an infallible True-Christian detector and an infallible True-Muslim detector, we can't make much of a distinction.
It is not possible to determine the exact motivation for acts committed far in the past. Only the acts themselves are relevant to this discussion.
Who says? Courts determine motive "beyond a reasonable doubt" all the time.
Courts determine guilt or innocence. They don't detect motive.
No, it is Christians that universally condemn barbarism in the name of religion, and Muslims themselves that argue that Muslims that deny barbaric acts are acceptable are not true Muslims.
That's the question that this thread aims to discuss. You can't just assert an answer and declare an end to it.
... further response to the same question is unnecessary.
Well, there hasn't been any response to the question yet. What examples do you have of barbaric acts committed by Muslims but not committed by Christians?
One could argue that scientists are the most barbaric people on earth based on some act of barbarism by a scientist, and based on your argument, unless all scientists have been innocent of the same atrocities as others, they are just as barbaric, right?
Wrong, of course. You're talking about one group. We're trying to compare two groups - like comparing the barbarity of scientists to the barbarity of plumbers.
Do you have some valid reason to ignore the tenets of the religions themselves and the motivation of acts of barbarism?
"The" tenets of the religions are not carved in stone. Different Christians have different tenets and different Muslims have different tenets. It isn't possible to base barbarity on "the" tenets when "the" tenets don't exist.
And as I said, the motivations for past acts can not be known, so they can add nothing to the discussion.
Do you have some valid reason for not answering the question: What barbaric acts have Muslims committed that Christians have not also committed?"

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 134 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 5:23 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 136 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 5:50 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 137 of 299 (335065)
07-25-2006 12:48 AM
Reply to: Message 136 by randman
07-24-2006 5:50 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
randman writes:
I suspect there are kindergarter teachers somewhere guilty of murder. Do we then argue that kindergarter teaching engenders barbarism?
We're not talking about a particular group "engendering" barbarism. We're talking about a particular group engaging in barbarism.
The simple fact is that Islamic radicals are killing and oppressing millions in Islamic areas and do so in the name of their religion without any corresponding parallel among Christians or Christianity today.
We're not just talking about what some Muslims are doing today. We're talking about what any group - say Christians - has ever done. You can't absolve Chtistianity of all barbaric acts just by saying they haven't done any in the past five minutes.
The simple fact is Jesus never implored his followers to persecute unbelievers, but Mohammed did and so does mainstream Islam.
It doesn't matter one bit who was implored or not implored to do what. It's only what they do do that counts.
One more time: give us some examples of "barbaric" acts that Muslims have commited that Christians have not also commited. The longer you avoid doing so, the more it looks like you can't do it - the more it looks like there are none - the more it looks like there is no historical difference between Christians and Muslims.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 136 by randman, posted 07-24-2006 5:50 PM randman has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 181 of 299 (335764)
07-27-2006 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by randman
07-27-2006 1:37 PM


Who cares?
randman writes:
My experiences with the RR is that this group of people cares more about people....
Do they care about gay people who want to get married?
... and children....
Do they care about children getting a useful education instead of creationist claptrap?
If that's all the "experience" you have, you need to get out more.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 1:37 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:36 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 183 of 299 (335770)
07-27-2006 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by randman
07-27-2006 2:36 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
... the caring of someone from the RR could be to try to help the gay individual to renounce his homosexuality and seek therapy and help from God in becoming heterosexual or perhaps asexual.
So I could show "caring" for a religious-right-winger by "helping" him to renounce his false religion and seeking therapy and help from God in becoming liberal or perhaps apolitical?
... they would help the gay friend just the same and maybe never bring up the gay issue with them.
It isn't about bringing up the "gay issue" with your friends. It's about oppressing all gay people by denying them the rights that everybody else enjoys.
There are still others that may doubt whether homosexuality is wrong, and others still that think homosexuality is OK, that homosexuals are borne that way, and that the scriptural condemnations of homosexuality are the result of cultural attitudes being added with more godly and divine thoughts (the idea being the Bible contains the word of God but is not all the word of God).
Are you still talking about the religious right? If so, they should be speaking out against the oppression espoused by their brethern.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:36 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:58 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 185 of 299 (335776)
07-27-2006 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by randman
07-27-2006 2:58 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
People can have differing opinions and don't have to resort to denigrating the other person's motives.
But that's exactly what the religious right is doing - not only denigrating the motives of those who disagree with them but actively campaigning to oppress gays, children, etc.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:58 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 3:48 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 187 of 299 (335811)
07-27-2006 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by randman
07-27-2006 3:48 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
They are not oppressing anyone.
Denying rights is not oppression? Forcing ignorance on children is not oppression? What definition of "oppression" are you using?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 3:48 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:10 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 193 of 299 (335836)
07-27-2006 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by randman
07-27-2006 6:10 PM


Re: Who cares?
No rights are being denied whatsoever.
The right of a person to marry the person of his or her choice is being denied. Good-hearted people are trying to remedy that situation, just as they tried to remedy the whites-only bathroom situation a few decades ago. The religious right is working hard to keep the discrimination entrenched.
The religious right is also trying to deny children the right to a good education by forcing creationist drivel into the schools.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:10 PM randman has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 195 of 299 (337326)
08-01-2006 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by inkorrekt
08-01-2006 11:29 PM


Re: setting the record straight
inkorrect writes:
Wherever there is irrational murder, there is always a muslim behind this.
Was Hitler a Muslim? Was Jeffrey Dahmer a Muslim? Was Timothy McVeigh a Muslim?
... all Terrorists are Muslims. Is this not true?
Obviously not.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by inkorrekt, posted 08-01-2006 11:29 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by inkorrekt, posted 08-02-2006 11:37 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 200 of 299 (337576)
08-02-2006 11:47 PM
Reply to: Message 199 by inkorrekt
08-02-2006 11:37 PM


Re: setting the record straight
inkorrect writes:
We are dealing with the present day reality and threats to our civilization posed by Islamofascism.
No, we're not. Read the OP. We're talking about "the barbarity of Christianity" (as compared to Islam).

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 199 by inkorrekt, posted 08-02-2006 11:37 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 201 by inkorrekt, posted 08-04-2006 4:47 PM ringo has not replied
 Message 202 by inkorrekt, posted 08-04-2006 5:05 PM ringo has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 203 of 299 (337962)
08-04-2006 5:59 PM
Reply to: Message 202 by inkorrekt
08-04-2006 5:05 PM


inkorrect writes:
AFter you check these pictures, then you tell me who these people are.They are not Christians
Well, the topic here is Christians.
Do you have anything to say about the topic?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 202 by inkorrekt, posted 08-04-2006 5:05 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 204 by inkorrekt, posted 08-13-2006 8:52 PM ringo has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 433 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 207 of 299 (341688)
08-20-2006 3:02 AM
Reply to: Message 206 by inkorrekt
08-20-2006 1:21 AM


inkorrect writes:
If they are going to kill and destroy valuable human life, why would they read this book which is considered to be sacred just before committing such atrocious acts in the name of Allah?
Same reason that Christian soldiers also read the Bible before going into battle - it comforts them.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 206 by inkorrekt, posted 08-20-2006 1:21 AM inkorrekt has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024