Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,833 Year: 4,090/9,624 Month: 961/974 Week: 288/286 Day: 9/40 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Barbarity of Christianity (as compared to Islam)
Isaac
Inactive Member


Message 90 of 299 (334611)
07-23-2006 7:23 PM
Reply to: Message 89 by inkorrekt
07-23-2006 7:12 PM


Re: setting the record straight
I never expressed this at all. You have only assumed this. I am only quoting your Prophet. If bringing out the real meaning of Islam and its commandment regarding how Infidels are to be treated is hatred, I do not know what your definition of hatred is?
You must have missed that bit about there being no compulsion in religion in the Quran. Nice try.
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 89 by inkorrekt, posted 07-23-2006 7:12 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 194 by inkorrekt, posted 08-01-2006 11:29 PM Isaac has not replied

Isaac
Inactive Member


Message 140 of 299 (335175)
07-25-2006 1:39 PM
Reply to: Message 139 by randman
07-25-2006 10:58 AM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
ikabod, there was more than a small tax to be a non-Muslim. Under most of these lands, the people were Christians or Jews, but over the centuries, the Muslim conquerers imposes a system of discrimination that encouraged others to become Muslim but strictly persecuted any Muslim from becoming non-Muslim in a violent manner.
Nonsense and mostly baseless. In fact initially the Arabs didn't want mass conversions to Islam in their conquered territories because of the prospect of losing money from the taxes (which many Jews, as you might know, felt was a fair price to pay compared to the barbarous inquisitions of Christianity). As has been mentioned, the Arab conquest was heartily welcomed by the Christians of the mid-east due to the tyrannical Byzantines (who tried to ruthlessly wipe out the Arian heresies,among others, in the region - so much for tolerance) and Persians.
So you have a curious situation in places like Egypt where the Coptics are severely persecuted, but you may have some prominent Coptics rise up to prominence nevertheless. It's sort of like how you had a few black slave-owners in the South except the prominent Coptics are not engaging in the oppression. The fact some can find a way to prosper does not change the oppressive systematic discrimination and persecution that was instituted under Muslim rule.
Christian Europe has a long and fruitful persecution of religious minorities, and in fact puts the Muslims to shame here. I like the way how you totally avoid this.
That's why areas that were predominantly Christian are predominantly Muslim now, and only a pockets of Christians in these areas.
One wonders what happened to all those Pre-christian Pagans in Europe.
Of course, some Muslim states like Saudi Arabia do not permit open Christianity at all, and you cannot even take a Bible in there without risking arrest.
They are heretics, deviating from the real teachings of Islam (see its that easy).
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : Spelling
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : Added a bit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 139 by randman, posted 07-25-2006 10:58 AM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 141 by randman, posted 07-25-2006 1:50 PM Isaac has replied

Isaac
Inactive Member


Message 142 of 299 (335187)
07-25-2006 2:08 PM
Reply to: Message 141 by randman
07-25-2006 1:50 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
The fact that persecution by some churches helped alleviate opposition from local Christians to the Arab conquest makes no difference at all in changing the fact over the centuries the Muslims have persecuted others, making them 2nd class citizens and at times burning down their churches and outlawing their faith.
I don't deny this may have happened. What I object to is your specious obliviousness of the fact that Christianity has in reality an awe-inspiring record of all the things you accuse Muslims of doing. In fact a brief examination of European history should make it succinctly clear, that Christianity when it comes to Religious Persecuton throughout history, tops the table.
Just look at Egypt, as the moderate persecutors, and Saudi Arabia as the radical ones, and you get a fair picture of the historical reality of Islamic persecution.
Until modern times, the situation in Europe was no different. So I cannot see the point. Wahhabism is a relatively modern phenomena in Islam, and the spread of extremist heresies in the Muslim world was in a large part a direct response to Christian colonialism and oppresion of large swathes of the Muslim World which only ended around 60 years ago (and one may argue the subjugation is still going on today).
Now, no one is ignoring that Evangelicals were also persecuted by Catholics in Europe and early Protestants, but it seems a bit odd to blame the victims for their own persecutions.
Not sure what point you're trying to make here.
Do we say the Jews, for instance, were guilty of gassing themselves because they were also German?
Sorry, come again?
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : spelling
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : added a bit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 141 by randman, posted 07-25-2006 1:50 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 143 by randman, posted 07-25-2006 2:12 PM Isaac has replied

Isaac
Inactive Member


Message 158 of 299 (335252)
07-25-2006 5:23 PM
Reply to: Message 143 by randman
07-25-2006 2:12 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
Evangelical Christianity has no record of persecutions in Europe whatsoever. That's just blatantly false.
I don't care which flavour of Christianity you're a part of. Christian history is Christian history. Anyway, lets have a brief look at some of the proud moments of Christianity in North America (a particularly succesful breeding ground for Evangelicalism):
1.) Genocide and ethnic cleansing of Native Americans.
2.) Slavery
3.) Institutionalised persecuation and oppression of racial minorities till the latter parts of the 20th Century (the persecution of African Americans had a religious justification)
They were the victims, not the persecutors, and over the centuries, the Evangelical and Anabaptist view as well as that of the original Christians in the first 300 years have become the norm for everyone in this area, and the Catholic heresy of persecutions as justifiable has faded away.
blablabla.... More of the same argumentative fallacy. Catholics are in fact Christians, whether you agree with their beliefs or not.
Can you say there is something similar within Islam for us to hope for reform? Were the original Muslims eschewing state religion and advocating freedom of religion, even to convert from Islam?
Your personal incredulity and ignorance is no argument. Reform will come, its unavoidable. Christianity has been effectively neutered in the West (Europe mainly), by Secularism, and this has been the real catalyst for the development of the modern liberal societies here. Where was this idea of religious freedom in Dark Age Europe? Have you tried comparing the religious freedoms in the Muslim World at the time compared to Europe? Pretty much debunks this senseless thesis of your.
Is that sort of acceptance of personal liberty something that has a strong root in Islam such that there is a clear wing within Islam from it's first leaders to the present whereby we can expect reform?
I find it amusing that the Americans who love trumpeting about freedom the most are themselves the biggest threat to freedom in your country (yes, thats the bible belt fascists). The problem with your entire case against Islam is that it depends on a purposeful and conspicuous contortion of Islamic history. I fully admit that the Muslim World is behind on many levels, but the real threat to progress and reformation in the Muslim world at the moment is the inequitable American interference as its a boon to the extremist elements. But regardless there are few Muslim Democracies that need to be mentioned (I've listed the populations as well):
1.) azerbaijan - 8 million
2.) Bangladesh - 148 million
3.) Indonesia - 245 million
4.) Malaysia - 70 million
5.) Mali - 12 million
5.) pakistan - 165 million (Pakistan is currently under a secular , miltary dictatorship, but I mention it as it has an extensive history of democracy)
6.) Turkey - 70 million
Add that up and you get around 720 million, more than half the entire Muslim population in the World. I agree that they cannot be compared to your average western democracy, but they're still young and I'm hopeful. The problems is fear and injustice are valuable comodities to the Religious demagogues, and any kind of widespread, significant reformation cannot take place in such conditions.
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : No reason given.
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : No reason given.
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : grammar
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : No reason given.
Edited by Isana Kadeb, : added a bit

This message is a reply to:
 Message 143 by randman, posted 07-25-2006 2:12 PM randman has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024