Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
1 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,488 Year: 3,745/9,624 Month: 616/974 Week: 229/276 Day: 5/64 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   The Barbarity of Christianity (as compared to Islam)
ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 181 of 299 (335764)
07-27-2006 2:27 PM
Reply to: Message 180 by randman
07-27-2006 1:37 PM


Who cares?
randman writes:
My experiences with the RR is that this group of people cares more about people....
Do they care about gay people who want to get married?
... and children....
Do they care about children getting a useful education instead of creationist claptrap?
If that's all the "experience" you have, you need to get out more.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 180 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 1:37 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 182 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:36 PM ringo has replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 182 of 299 (335767)
07-27-2006 2:36 PM
Reply to: Message 181 by ringo
07-27-2006 2:27 PM


Re: Who cares?
They care about gay people, but much of the religious right thinks homosexuality is a sin and so their form of caring may come off as bigotry to others, as the caring of someone from the RR could be to try to help the gay individual to renounce his homosexuality and seek therapy and help from God in becoming heterosexual or perhaps asexual.
But it's a complicated issue. There are also plenty that think homosxuality is wrong, but at the same time, have gay friends just as they have non-Christian friends or friends with various sins, and so they would help the gay friend just the same and maybe never bring up the gay issue with them.
There are still others that may doubt whether homosexuality is wrong, and others still that think homosexuality is OK, that homosexuals are borne that way, and that the scriptural condemnations of homosexuality are the result of cultural attitudes being added with more godly and divine thoughts (the idea being the Bible contains the word of God but is not all the word of God).

This message is a reply to:
 Message 181 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 2:27 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 183 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 2:48 PM randman has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 183 of 299 (335770)
07-27-2006 2:48 PM
Reply to: Message 182 by randman
07-27-2006 2:36 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
... the caring of someone from the RR could be to try to help the gay individual to renounce his homosexuality and seek therapy and help from God in becoming heterosexual or perhaps asexual.
So I could show "caring" for a religious-right-winger by "helping" him to renounce his false religion and seeking therapy and help from God in becoming liberal or perhaps apolitical?
... they would help the gay friend just the same and maybe never bring up the gay issue with them.
It isn't about bringing up the "gay issue" with your friends. It's about oppressing all gay people by denying them the rights that everybody else enjoys.
There are still others that may doubt whether homosexuality is wrong, and others still that think homosexuality is OK, that homosexuals are borne that way, and that the scriptural condemnations of homosexuality are the result of cultural attitudes being added with more godly and divine thoughts (the idea being the Bible contains the word of God but is not all the word of God).
Are you still talking about the religious right? If so, they should be speaking out against the oppression espoused by their brethern.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 182 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:36 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 184 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:58 PM ringo has replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 184 of 299 (335773)
07-27-2006 2:58 PM
Reply to: Message 183 by ringo
07-27-2006 2:48 PM


Re: Who cares?
So I could show "caring" for a religious-right-winger by "helping" him to renounce his false religion and seeking therapy and help from God in becoming liberal or perhaps apolitical?
You could be, but imo, you would be misguided, but that's the good thing about a free country. People can have differing opinions and don't have to resort to denigrating the other person's motives.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 183 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 2:48 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 185 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 3:04 PM randman has replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 185 of 299 (335776)
07-27-2006 3:04 PM
Reply to: Message 184 by randman
07-27-2006 2:58 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
People can have differing opinions and don't have to resort to denigrating the other person's motives.
But that's exactly what the religious right is doing - not only denigrating the motives of those who disagree with them but actively campaigning to oppress gays, children, etc.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 184 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 2:58 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 186 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 3:48 PM ringo has replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 186 of 299 (335781)
07-27-2006 3:48 PM
Reply to: Message 185 by ringo
07-27-2006 3:04 PM


Re: Who cares?
They are not oppressing anyone. That's just BS.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 185 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 3:04 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 187 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 5:26 PM randman has replied
 Message 198 by ramoss, posted 08-02-2006 7:28 PM randman has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 187 of 299 (335811)
07-27-2006 5:26 PM
Reply to: Message 186 by randman
07-27-2006 3:48 PM


Re: Who cares?
randman writes:
They are not oppressing anyone.
Denying rights is not oppression? Forcing ignorance on children is not oppression? What definition of "oppression" are you using?

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 186 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 3:48 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 190 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:10 PM ringo has replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 188 of 299 (335816)
07-27-2006 5:57 PM
Reply to: Message 178 by randman
07-27-2006 1:16 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
quote:
No, they don't oppress people. They have different political views from you.
...which causes them to limit many of my and others' freedoms on the basis of their religious beliefs.
I call that oppression.
quote:
What is unAmerican is for you to demonize legitimate political differences as oppression.
When it is oppression, I call it oppression.
There is no reasonable secular legal, constitutional reason to block the release of emergency contraception. The only reason to block it is to impose one's own religious views upon everyone else.
quote:
The truth is the Left is far more "oppressive" under those standards. They propose taking more money from people via higher taxes,
...to provide services that everyone uses and needs, like the military, infrastructure like roads, police and firefighers and EMT's, national wilderness areas and parklands, public schools, etc.
I would be happy to pay MORE taxes if the rich paid their fair share. But they currently do not pay their fair share. Their overall tax burden as a percentage of their income is proportionaltely lower than what the middle class pays.
quote:
and this includes the poor as well as the rich (gas taxes and FICA).
If rich people paid their fair share of taxes, the middle class and the poor wouldn't be getting poorer like they are now, and the right wouldn't be able to be continuing to become richer, like they are now.
quote:
They propose all sorts of safety laws oppressing people.....heck, they even "oppress" children by demanding they wear helmets when biking.
get the drift.....
That is hardly the same kind of thing and you know it.
quote:
The RR is not oppressing anyone.
If there were a small group of Conservative, radical Jews that became powerful in the US, and they started to pass laws which restricted the sale of pork, would you consider them to be oppressing the majority of US citizens who dod not follow Jewish dietary laws?
quote:
They believe outlawing abortion is, for example, saving a life. So the motive is saving a life, not oppression.
Motive matters not at all in deciding if it is oppression or not.
Those nice Jewish people I mentioned above just want all of us to follow God's law. They are doing us a favor by banning all pork in the US. They are only concerned about our eternal souls, so it's not oppression.
Right?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 178 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 1:16 PM randman has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 189 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:09 PM nator has replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 189 of 299 (335819)
07-27-2006 6:09 PM
Reply to: Message 188 by nator
07-27-2006 5:57 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
So confiscating your money, limiting what you can do, etc, etc,....is not oppression, but somehow trying to protect babies from being brutally murdered is?
There's not much more to discuss shraf. imo, the RR is fighting for basic human rights, such as the right to live, and you are fighting for the right to continue to brutally slaughter babies that are viable outside of the womb, and want to confiscate poor people's retirement money (FICA) and waste it on government programs, defraud black landowners in SC for open space requirements and other "oppressive measures", if such political differences count as oppression.
Edited by randman, : No reason given.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 188 by nator, posted 07-27-2006 5:57 PM nator has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 191 by nator, posted 07-27-2006 6:15 PM randman has not replied
 Message 192 by nator, posted 07-27-2006 6:15 PM randman has not replied

randman 
Suspended Member (Idle past 4921 days)
Posts: 6367
Joined: 05-26-2005


Message 190 of 299 (335821)
07-27-2006 6:10 PM
Reply to: Message 187 by ringo
07-27-2006 5:26 PM


Re: Who cares?
No rights are being denied whatsoever. That's total crap.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 187 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 5:26 PM ringo has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 193 by ringo, posted 07-27-2006 6:43 PM randman has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 191 of 299 (335824)
07-27-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by randman
07-27-2006 6:09 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
.
Edited by schrafinator, : double post

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:09 PM randman has not replied

nator
Member (Idle past 2192 days)
Posts: 12961
From: Ann Arbor
Joined: 12-09-2001


Message 192 of 299 (335825)
07-27-2006 6:15 PM
Reply to: Message 189 by randman
07-27-2006 6:09 PM


Re: Is that an acceptable standard?
If there were a small group of Conservative, radical Jews that became powerful in the US, and they started to pass laws which restricted the sale of pork, would you consider them to be oppressing the majority of US citizens who do not follow Jewish dietary laws?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 189 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:09 PM randman has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 193 of 299 (335836)
07-27-2006 6:43 PM
Reply to: Message 190 by randman
07-27-2006 6:10 PM


Re: Who cares?
No rights are being denied whatsoever.
The right of a person to marry the person of his or her choice is being denied. Good-hearted people are trying to remedy that situation, just as they tried to remedy the whites-only bathroom situation a few decades ago. The religious right is working hard to keep the discrimination entrenched.
The religious right is also trying to deny children the right to a good education by forcing creationist drivel into the schools.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 190 by randman, posted 07-27-2006 6:10 PM randman has not replied

inkorrekt
Member (Idle past 6104 days)
Posts: 382
From: Westminster,CO, USA
Joined: 02-04-2006


Message 194 of 299 (337325)
08-01-2006 11:29 PM
Reply to: Message 90 by Isaac
07-23-2006 7:23 PM


Re: setting the record straight
Did you see the rally they had recently in London? I saw all the posters. Most of them said," Islam is the religion of the world". Anyone who insults Islam will be executed.
What do you read in Surah 33-35? Does it not tell you what you should do to the Infidels? The suicide bombers on 911 read Koran before murdering 3000 innocent people on 911.You can deny the facts. Look around the world. Wherever there is irrational murder, there is always a muslim behind this. All muslims are not terrorists. But, all Terrorists are Muslims. Is this not true?
Whether you like it or not, atime is coming when we all the non muslims will be asked to convert to Islam. If we refused, our heads would be cut off. This day is coming.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 90 by Isaac, posted 07-23-2006 7:23 PM Isaac has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by ringo, posted 08-01-2006 11:49 PM inkorrekt has replied
 Message 196 by Modulous, posted 08-02-2006 12:28 AM inkorrekt has not replied
 Message 197 by Jaderis, posted 08-02-2006 2:58 AM inkorrekt has not replied

ringo
Member (Idle past 434 days)
Posts: 20940
From: frozen wasteland
Joined: 03-23-2005


Message 195 of 299 (337326)
08-01-2006 11:49 PM
Reply to: Message 194 by inkorrekt
08-01-2006 11:29 PM


Re: setting the record straight
inkorrect writes:
Wherever there is irrational murder, there is always a muslim behind this.
Was Hitler a Muslim? Was Jeffrey Dahmer a Muslim? Was Timothy McVeigh a Muslim?
... all Terrorists are Muslims. Is this not true?
Obviously not.

Help scientific research in your spare time. No cost. No obligation.
Join the World Community Grid with Team EvC

This message is a reply to:
 Message 194 by inkorrekt, posted 08-01-2006 11:29 PM inkorrekt has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 199 by inkorrekt, posted 08-02-2006 11:37 PM ringo has replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024