Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9164 total)
4 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,432 Year: 3,689/9,624 Month: 560/974 Week: 173/276 Day: 13/34 Hour: 0/6


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Is Science a Religion?
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 42 of 313 (381547)
01-31-2007 4:28 PM
Reply to: Message 33 by Open MInd
01-31-2007 4:12 PM


Re: Why must the teapot be a religion, anyway?
Obviously, the people who involve themselves with science are trying to avoid religion.
I involve myself with science and I'm not trying to avoid religion.
What is wrong with saying that science is a religion?
What is wrong with saying that a dog is a cat?

This message is a reply to:
 Message 33 by Open MInd, posted 01-31-2007 4:12 PM Open MInd has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 51 by Open MInd, posted 01-31-2007 7:45 PM New Cat's Eye has replied

New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 58 of 313 (381648)
02-01-2007 1:49 PM
Reply to: Message 51 by Open MInd
01-31-2007 7:45 PM


The question you have to ask yourself is how much do you involve yourself in science and how religious are you?
I involve myself in science at my job and I'm this -->| - - - - | But seriously, how do I tell you how religious I am? On a scale of 1 to 10 with 10 being the most religious, I would put myself at a 5.
How much do you really believe in your religion?
Even if my faith is weak, I'm not avoiding religion like you claimed. I do believe in my religion. I don't see why how much faith I have is important to this discussion.
Did you contact your religious leader before you decided to study science?
No. Why should I? Do you think a Catholic priest would advise against me getting a Bachelor's of Science? Or were you talking about the pope?
If you do study religion and you are a firm believer in your religion, how much do you really believe in your science?
What do you mean by "believe in" when refering to science?
When I go into the lab this afternoon and find that this new product has a corrosion rate on aluminum of 100 mils/year, how do I "believe in" the science that I used? Is it because I accept the results as accurate? Or is it that I believe the scientific explanation for the cause of the corrosion? And what does that have to do with me believing that Jesus is God and trying to follow his teachings?
It is obvious that one can not truly believe in his religion and firmly believe in science.
It is not obvious to me, please explain.
And now you've thrown the words "truley" and "firmly" in there. You are changing your statement into something that cannot be false because I don't think that anyone firmly believes in science. Scientfic results are tentatively accepted. And now you can say to anyone who does believe "well, you don't truly believe." You are being dishonest. You should repent.
But anyways, the reason I replied was this statement:
quote:
Obviously, the people who involve themselves with science are trying to avoid religion.
Like I said, I involve myself in science and I am not avoiding religion. I'm sorry, but you are just plain wrong, and the statement is far from obvious.
When you named yourself "Open MInd", were you being sarcastic?
You're making it very hard for me to have any respect for you. Please explain why you believe the way you do.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 51 by Open MInd, posted 01-31-2007 7:45 PM Open MInd has not replied

Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024