Fresh Problem with the Ark

Hmmm. No different than what some of your people are saying. For example, "how did life begin?" is eventually answered, "we don't know how, we just know it did." That's just the dark side version of saying "God did it." Three fingers pointing back at you, dude. You have absolutely no idea how life began. You only know "it did".And to which post can you direct me when I said stuff I "made up?" You went totally "clueless" on me when you visualized the naked breast thing, so I'm guessing have yet to understand a single word I've said.
I'm using quotes and information from God's word. I've been accused of trying have absolute knowledge, but falsely. God's word says that all men are sinful; that's not me saying that. Are you paying any attention at all, or are you just interested in performing cheap shots and sniping?

We have Why only one Grand Canyon which discusses the Grand Canyon and I'm sure there are many more in this forum. Please take any discussion of the Grand Canyon to an appropriate thread.

---

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

You go, CF! Keep talking about what it looked like AFTER God was finished with it, rather than what laws of physics he ignored in order to do it. Love ya, man.

this is not about the grand canyon it is about the ark and fresh water )and the fact of the grand canyon is that the water flow you talk about would have gone around it instead. you lack of geology is also showing).there are forums about the grand canyon if you want to pursue this further.

quote:

---

Three fingers pointing back at you, dude. You have absolutely no idea how life began. You only know "it did".

​

And to which post can you direct me when I said stuff I "made up?" You went totally "clueless" on me when you visualized the naked breast thing, so I'm guessing have yet to understand a single word I've said.

---

Maybe you want to work on your basic reading skills before you accuse me of being "clueless"?

quote:

---

Are you paying any attention at all

---

Quite clearly you aren't - LMAOWhy? because you didn't even notice that that was a reply to A TOTALLY DIFFERENT PERSON.This message has been edited by Charles Knight, 01-15-2005 23:08 AM

What do you mean by "provable"? When that is used loosely in science it means that there is no better explanation for what we see.You seem to think you know something here or you wouldn't be saying "It is not.". Since you think you know something why aren't you in the dates and dating and biological evolution fora other topics in here showing what is wrong with the dating correlations, explaining biogeography and telling us how the fossils got sorted?You seem to think that you will gain something by making statements and avoiding any place where you could back them up. That is sooooo typical.

"And to which post can you direct me when I said stuff I "made up?" You went totally "clueless" on me when you visualized the naked breast thing, so I'm guessing have yet to understand a single word I've said.
I'm using quotes and information from God's word. I've been accused of trying have absolute knowledge, but falsely. God's word says that all men are sinful; that's not me saying that. Are you paying any attention at all, or are you just interested in performing cheap shots and sniping?"Thanks it's great to see that I'm not going at this alone.These guys want us to prove all this stuff, now it's there turn. How did amphibians evolve into reptiles when there eggs are completely differant?

There is one HUGE difference. The GDI "answer" pretends to actually know and the inquiry stops. The "I don't know" view allows for continued effort to actually find an answer.The GDI answer has failed over and over throughout history. The "I don't know-- let's see if we can figure it out" approach has been spectacularly successful.We don't know what comes next or if we will run into a limit of what we can figure out but based on our past experience I think I know which horse I will bet on in this race.

I know it's in the wrong area(you are all very big on that) but I'm sick of having to defend my faith while others mock us blindly accepting their own.

This would make an excellent "Biological Evolution" thread. I suggest that you propose a new topic and it can be discussed.

It is over THERE.THEIR turnTHEIR Eggs.

stupid? thanks. being called stupid by someone who cannot understand the problems involve is really refreshing.the evidence of fossils supports evolution, the evidence of ring species supports evolution, no one needed to "be there" to see it happen to know how it works. versus a total lack of evidence for events that supposedly were observed? Carnivores have been observed eating plant material in little bits for some specific reasons, but not making a full diet of it for extended periods of time. ANd for the length of time that the ark was afloat? yes I do. ANd you still have not answered the problem of the fresh kept separate from the sewage.Oh gee -- that is the topic?

Creationfan,There is very little "mocking of faith" done around here in the science forums. No one here has any problem with you "believing" anything you want, but if you are going to bring up sciencelike answers in a science forum you will be called on it every time.We have religious fora here where faith, believe and the bible can be discussed and yes, there are going to be people who do not believe what you believe, or do not believe how you believe.You will find a wide range of religious beliefs on this board and a wide range of science knowledge and any number of combinations of the two.If you want to discuss the Grand Canyon please take it to an appropriate forum. If you want to discuss whether or not evolution or creationism is science, please take it to an appropriate forum. If you want to discuss your faith and beliefs, please...well you get the idea.

---

AdminAsgara Queen of the Universe

http://asgarasworld.bravepages.com http://perditionsgate.bravepages.com

Sure, I was just curious why Creationist are the only ones defending here. I know, what is the real reason you don't want to believe in the flood? Is it because your scared of the possibility of God's future judgement(revelation).

Ned, I knew someone would say that, but I never thought it would be you (I thought you were far too smart, honest). So, despite my respect for you, I must quickly dismantle your poor concept.First: Sorry, but that doesn't fly. The wonders of God are infinite; I have yet to cease from being amazed by the secrets that continue to reveal themselves from God's word and Science (I've been at it for 27 years now, with no end in sight). The inquiry never stops. The problem is when we try to put God into a box; when we try to explain the universe from INSIDE the universe (like trying to explain a computer from INSIDE the computer, with NO knowledge of what exists OUTSIDE the computer). No, the inquiry continues. I wish you could experience and understand this reality. Ummm... WHAT? How did you arrive at that conclusion? Doesn't even make sense. Not even as a bold statement.As for your horse, my advice is: Don't bet on horses.But now we're off topic.