|
Author
|
Topic: Thread Reopen Requests 2
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
Message 16 of 112 (480154)
09-01-2008 7:41 AM
|
Reply to: Message 15 by cavediver
08-31-2008 11:49 AM
|
|
Re: Why is the Intelligent Designer such an idiot?
The last two pages degenerated, which is why Adminnemooseus closed it. There were multiple contributors to the degeneration, for an example of your own see Message 148. I'll reopen the thread, but I leave it to you to keep the thread focused on arguments from evidence rather than from incredulity and ridicule, otherwise the thread will soon be closed again.For future reference, threads with titles that include words like "idiot" might do well at attracting participants, but not necessarily the serious ones you might like, and like a red car on the highway they tend to attract the attention of moderators, too. You might consider changing the title to something like, "Why is the Intelligent Designer Inept?"
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 15 by cavediver, posted 08-31-2008 11:49 AM | | cavediver has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 17 by cavediver, posted 09-01-2008 8:52 AM | | Admin has acknowledged this reply | | | Message 18 by Huntard, posted 11-21-2008 9:45 PM | | Admin has acknowledged this reply |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 23 of 112 (503785)
03-22-2009 7:20 AM
|
Reply to: Message 22 by RAZD
03-21-2009 6:29 PM
|
|
Re: Age Correlations
Daniel4140 wasn't addressing the thread's topic. If Daniel4140 doesn't propose a topic to discuss his issues then someone else should do it for him. His marshaling of a number of creationist arguments against dating methods deserves to be addressed.Your topic proposal has been promoted.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 22 by RAZD, posted 03-21-2009 6:29 PM | | RAZD has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 28 by RAZD, posted 03-22-2009 7:09 PM | | Admin has acknowledged this reply |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 29 of 112 (503842)
03-22-2009 7:51 PM
|
Reply to: Message 27 by NosyNed
03-22-2009 6:01 PM
|
|
Re: Age Correlations
If what I think the topic is about is right, that it's to focus on the correlation between methods rather on the details of the methods themselves, then I'm okay with it. Maybe Mod will chime in.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 27 by NosyNed, posted 03-22-2009 6:01 PM | | NosyNed has not yet responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 31 of 112 (506845)
04-29-2009 7:00 PM
|
Reply to: Message 30 by RAZD
04-29-2009 6:39 PM
|
|
Re: pink
Thread's open, summate away!
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 30 by RAZD, posted 04-29-2009 6:39 PM | | RAZD has acknowledged this reply |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 33 of 112 (514153)
07-04-2009 8:13 AM
|
Reply to: Message 32 by Bailey
07-03-2009 9:36 PM
|
|
Re: God and the blind Tailor
It's a holiday weekend and I don't know when Adminnemooseus will be on line next, so I'll reopen this for you. When Adminnemooseus is next on line he can decide whether to keep it open.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 32 by Bailey, posted 07-03-2009 9:36 PM | | Bailey has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 34 by Bailey, posted 07-11-2009 7:20 AM | | Admin has responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 35 of 112 (514729)
07-11-2009 4:32 PM
|
Reply to: Message 34 by Bailey
07-11-2009 7:20 AM
|
|
Re: Admin signatures, etc ...
Just wanted to make sure we opened the right thread. And thanks for your help with finding the source of that bug.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 34 by Bailey, posted 07-11-2009 7:20 AM | | Bailey has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 36 by Bailey, posted 07-11-2009 9:48 PM | | Admin has acknowledged this reply | | | Message 37 by Straggler, posted 07-27-2009 2:17 PM | | Admin has responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 38 of 112 (516794)
07-27-2009 2:20 PM
|
Reply to: Message 37 by Straggler
07-27-2009 2:17 PM
|
|
Re: Hypothesis Thread
Sure, don't know how it got closed. I intended to leave it open a few days. I'll open it back up.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 37 by Straggler, posted 07-27-2009 2:17 PM | | Straggler has responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
Re: I did it
Note to self: complete the implementation of the admin action log. 
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 40 by Adminnemooseus, posted 07-27-2009 10:34 PM | | Adminnemooseus has not yet responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 43 of 112 (518662)
08-07-2009 7:14 AM
|
Reply to: Message 42 by Coyote
08-07-2009 12:37 AM
|
|
Re: Devolution (from The Fall) and "No New Information"
The thread in question is Devolution (from The Fall) and "No New Information".In the opening post you said: | Coyote writes: Because this would be off topic on that thread, I would like to propose a thread to explore how one could come to the belief in devolution/no new information without a religious, and in particular a biblical, background. |
In your most recent message you said, Message 32, you said: | I would like to keep the topic to how someone could accept the geocentric belief in spite of the immense scientific evidence to the contrary. |
The change in focus from "devolution/no new information" to "geocentric belief" is why Adminnemooseus believed the thread to be drifting off-topic. I think I understand that what you actually intended as the thread's central focus was making the case that all beliefs of this sort are religiously motivated rather than scientifically evidenced. I'll reopen the thread, but in your next post please make clear the thread's central focus.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 42 by Coyote, posted 08-07-2009 12:37 AM | | Coyote has not yet responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 47 of 112 (551940)
03-25-2010 11:58 AM
|
Reply to: Message 46 by Buzsaw
03-25-2010 11:47 AM
|
|
Re: Buzsaw's Perfect World
Try [tid=type-thread-ID-here].
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 46 by Buzsaw, posted 03-25-2010 11:47 AM | | Buzsaw has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 03-25-2010 12:33 PM | | Admin has responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 49 of 112 (551959)
03-25-2010 1:50 PM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
03-25-2010 12:33 PM
|
|
Re: Buzsaw's Perfect World
Each thread has an ID number, so if you say something like [tid=13101] (where 13101 is the thread ID for this thread) then you'll get Thread Reopen Requests 2. If you hover over any link to the thread or link to a message of that thread then you'll see the thread ID displayed in the little hoverbox. And once I know what thread you're referring to I can check if it makes sense to reopen it.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 03-25-2010 12:33 PM | | Buzsaw has not yet responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 50 by Huntard, posted 03-25-2010 2:33 PM | | Admin has acknowledged this reply |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
(1)
| |
| |
| |
|
|
Message 52 of 112 (552062)
03-26-2010 8:29 AM
|
Reply to: Message 48 by Buzsaw
03-25-2010 12:33 PM
|
|
Re: Buzsaw's Perfect World
Hi Buz,About Buzsaw's perfect world, I think AdminAsgara was right to close it and that it should stay closed. Edited by Admin, : Change author.
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 48 by Buzsaw, posted 03-25-2010 12:33 PM | | Buzsaw has not yet responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 55 of 112 (561379)
05-20-2010 7:30 AM
|
Reply to: Message 53 by Buzsaw
05-20-2010 1:10 AM
|
|
Re: Flood Possibility Thread
| Buzsaw writes: Hopefully the floodgate could remain open for some possible responses to my answer to Taq's question which received a five-er from someone who evidently was interested in my response. Thanks. |
No one has rated any of your messages in the The Impossibility Of The Flood thread, so I'm wondering if you're talking about a different thread.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 53 by Buzsaw, posted 05-20-2010 1:10 AM | | Buzsaw has responded |
| Replies to this message: | | | Message 56 by Buzsaw, posted 05-20-2010 10:33 PM | | Admin has responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 57 of 112 (561520)
05-21-2010 3:14 AM
|
Reply to: Message 56 by Buzsaw
05-20-2010 10:33 PM
|
|
Re: Flood Possibility Thread
Taq's rhetorical question was making a point, not requesting information.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 56 by Buzsaw, posted 05-20-2010 10:33 PM | | Buzsaw has not yet responded |
|
Admin
Director Posts: 11270 From: EvC Forum Joined: 06-14-2002 Member Rating: 9.6
|
|
|
Message 66 of 112 (572150)
08-04-2010 7:44 AM
|
Reply to: Message 64 by Big_Al35
08-04-2010 7:15 AM
|
|
Definition of Species Reopened.
Definition of Species has been reopened.
| -- | Percy | | | EvC Forum Director |
| This message is a reply to: | | | Message 64 by Big_Al35, posted 08-04-2010 7:15 AM | | Big_Al35 has not yet responded |
|
™ Version 4.0 Beta
