But how can there be balance if board administration is determined that the primary component of any argument be evidence.
And any evidence, such as Bible Codes or Prayer studies, or theomatics, or NDE research, studies on the effects of religious beliefs, we evolutionists of course throw out for various reasons that seem good to us....objectively of course.....
C'mon, Percy, give yourself a break! Haven't you caught on yet that you are swamped in subjective explaining away of every bit of evidence you don't like. "It's anecdotal, it's not peer reviewed, some body somewhere debunked it,... ad nauseum." instead of spending your time replicating and reporting real evidence? You say that you metaphysical arguments don't carry much weight, so why do you give such weight to rationalizations?
Stephen