EvC Forum: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 10.0

Email This Thread

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Author

Topic: General Discussion Of Moderation Procedures 10.0

Hyroglyphx

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 97 of 305 (388399)
03-05-2007 9:47 PM

Reply to: Message 93 by AdminBuzsaw
03-05-2007 4:04 PM

Re: Good Day. May God Bless All

Hang in there, Nemmisis J, my dear brother in Christ Jesus and www cyber friend. You're the best ever and most intelligent, witty and articulate creo to show up at EvC to the glory of Jehovah god the father and Jesus the lord and savior bar none.

"He has shown you, O man, what is good; And what does the Lord require of you but to do justly, to love mercy, and to walk humbly with your God. -Micah 6:8

This message is a reply to:
	Message 93 by AdminBuzsaw, posted 03-05-2007 4:04 PM		AdminBuzsaw has not replied

Hyroglyphx

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 294 of 305 (410211)
07-13-2007 7:17 PM

Reply to: Message 283 by PaulK
07-08-2007 3:24 PM

Re: Sleazy creationist tactics

I note that Nemesis Juggernaut has chosen to revive an months-old Showcase thread as an excuse to make the usual Creationist slanders about evolution.

First of all, I'm not a creationist. I'm an ID'ist. Secondly, I didn't revive anything. It was a brand new thread.

If he really wants to discuss the subject - and I don't think that he does - he has every opportunity to propose a thread to deal with the issue in the other forums. The only advantage of using the Showcase forum, are to escape moderation and to make it harder for people to point out the falsehoods in his post. Hardly noble motives.

What are you talking about?

All you have to do is address my post IN Showcase if you have a problem with it and debate the issue there instead of running in here and making slanderous accusations. You want to talk about sleazy tactics, yet here you are crying to the Admins over spilled milk. What exactly do you want them to do, Paul? Order me not to use the Showcase forum?

I just so happen to respond to the threads that interest me. The one in Showcase just so happened to interest me. Seriously, what's the problem?

"The problem of Christianity is not that it has been tried and found wanting, but that it is difficult and left untried" -G.K. Chesterton

This message is a reply to:
	Message 283 by PaulK, posted 07-08-2007 3:24 PM		PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 298 by PaulK, posted 07-14-2007 5:23 AM		Hyroglyphx has replied

Hyroglyphx

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 302 of 305 (410342)
07-14-2007 12:25 PM

Reply to: Message 300 by berberry
07-14-2007 8:42 AM

Re: To AdminPD

The comparison of gay sex to rape is crystal clear. If it isn't clear to you, then just what do you think that moralizing bastard was talking about?

The general philosophy for those who maintain a secular worldview believe in "live and let live." That means, let me believe in whatever I want to, and let me do whatever I want to do, so long as I don't hurt anybody.

Taz basically said that gay sex doesn't hurt him. So I made the comment that just because he hasn't personally been raped, does that mean rape isn't wrong?

One had nothing to do with the other. It had everything to do with his methodology.

This is a long-standing pattern with nemjug, going back much further than even his comparison of gays to animals last year

No it isn't. The only one whoever really understood what I was getting at was Holmes, who was an atheist, pro-gay, pro-abortion guy-- hardly someone who would advocate for me unless he understood what I was saying.

I'm not saying, nor have I ever said, that homosexuals are exactly like pedophiles or zoophiles. My reason for mentioning it so that you can understand my position better. If you say that homosexuality is good, but pedophilia is bad, while maintaining a morally relativistic view, you commit debate suicide. I just want you to be aware of that.

This is the millionth time that I've gone over it. I suspect that you know exactly what I'm talking about, but you can't really defend your position so its easier for you to just chime in with name calling-- which is traditionally what people resort to when they're losing a debate. You make the inference.

I should think anyone of even the meanest intelligence, if not "washed in the blood of jesus" or what the fuck ever, would be able to detect nemjug's condescending and patronizing attitude toward anyone, and especially gays, who do not share his narrow-minded and unabashedly bigoted world-view.

You do realize how oxymoronic it is to say that I have a narrow-minded worldview while not believing in any moral absolutes, right? It all boils down to opinion. So why would my opinion be viewed more narrowly than yours? Think deeply about it Berberry. The answer is staring you in the face. You can call it condescending if you want. I call it reasonable.

"The problem of Christianity is not that it has been tried and found wanting, but that it is difficult and left untried" -G.K. Chesterton

This message is a reply to:
	Message 300 by berberry, posted 07-14-2007 8:42 AM		berberry has not replied

Hyroglyphx

Inactive Member

Normal Thread Display

Message 303 of 305 (410345)
07-14-2007 12:41 PM

Reply to: Message 298 by PaulK
07-14-2007 5:23 AM

Re: Sleazy creationist tactics

Virtually all IDists are Creationists. So that's not much of aa distinction.

There is a major distinction. One group does not invoke the image of a Creator, only reasons that there must be one, while the other invokes specific images and rules for the game.

And your second point is disproven by the dates in the thread itself. The first post was possted on 04-08-2007. Your reply was posted on 07-08-2007. That's three months. April to July. So you did revive a months-old thread, and - given the way this forum works - it would be hard for you not to know it.

For whatever reason, Syamsu's post fell under the radar. If you'll note, my reply was the first reply ever. I revived nothing because it was never alive to begin with.

quote:
All you have to do is address my post IN Showcase if you have a problem with it and debate the issue there

Not true. I believe that I currently have access to Showcase, however that was granted to pursue one particular thread - not that one. So by replying to you I would be going against the conditions under which the access was granted. Unless access has been generally opened - which I have no memory of - then many people have no access to Showcase.

Showcase is open for business. There is literally nothing that would prohibited you from posting a reply in Showcase. If you could only gain access from an Admin, just ask one. I'm an Admin. You want in? I'll make it happen.

I would like the Admins to close the thread and make you go through the usual process to start a thread.

What for?!?!?

I can't respond to someone else's thread? Seriously, what exactly is your objection?

actually follow the forum rules rather than let you take advantage of the Showcase forum.

Point out what "rule" I'm breaking Paul. If you can do that, I'll concede.

Telling the truth about you is a "slanderous accusation" - while you feel free to make vicious and baseless accusations against anybody who doesn't agree with your views. It's just so typical.

What great "truth" about me have you exposed, Paul? And what vicious and baseless accusations have I made? I thought I was in here to debate. The viciousness and baseless accusations seem to be all on your side of the table.

"The problem of Christianity is not that it has been tried and found wanting, but that it is difficult and left untried" -G.K. Chesterton

This message is a reply to:
	Message 298 by PaulK, posted 07-14-2007 5:23 AM		PaulK has replied

Replies to this message:
	Message 304 by PaulK, posted 07-14-2007 12:54 PM		Hyroglyphx has not replied

Date format: mm-dd-yyyy

Timezone: ET (US)

Newer Topic | Older Topic

Do Nothing Button

2 online now:	PaulK, Phat
Newest Member:	ChatGPT
Post Volume:	Total: 916,762 Year: 4,019/9,624 Month: 890/974 Week: 217/286 Day: 24/109 Hour: 0/2