Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Draft of anti-ID letter to the editor
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 17 (409573)
07-10-2007 9:52 AM
Reply to: Message 1 by Minnemooseus
07-10-2007 5:36 AM


Do you have a link to the letter that you're replying too?
Just curious.
I think your letter would be improved by the suggestions already provided. It looks good to me.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 1 by Minnemooseus, posted 07-10-2007 5:36 AM Minnemooseus has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 11 by Minnemooseus, posted 07-10-2007 8:59 PM New Cat's Eye has not replied

  
New Cat's Eye
Inactive Member


Message 15 of 17 (409793)
07-11-2007 10:28 AM
Reply to: Message 13 by Nighttrain
07-11-2007 7:52 AM


Re: Hardline
Only an Incompetent Designer would fill the bill
Intellegence and competence are not mutually exclusive.
Should there be an intelligent designer, then he/she/it deserves no respect, having created millions of species that couldn`t withstand five major extinctions, often are poorly constructed so spend their lives restricted, or in pain, have little or no defences against the ID`s diseases, are sustained almost completely by another life form (bacteria), and, in the case of mankind, resort to fantasies to cope with reality.
You're just labeling those things as "bad". Maybe that is the best way for things to have happened. We don't know if they're good or bad.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 13 by Nighttrain, posted 07-11-2007 7:52 AM Nighttrain has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024