Mummified hadrosaur evidence of recent global flood

It is a mummy (from what I read). It is a fossilized mummy.That is, it was dessicated and mummified. We see this happen with animals in the right climate all the time. If the climate is right I think this happens in days, weeks or months.Then the mummy was fossilzed. That is the original dry flesh was replaced with minerals. I guess we don't know yet if it is a total mineralization or not.The fact that it was mummified first makes nonsense out of the "it had to happen fast" claim.

Mummies are not just anthropogenic. It is suggested that the Egyptians developed the idea and techniques because they observed natural mummification.Mummy - WikipediaDown a bit there is a discussion of natural mummies. Which are taken as only being human remains in this article.

Tis too a mummy! Well, it was a mummy but it has now been replaced with rock that preserves many details of the mummy. If it isn't a fossilzed mummy now then regular dinosaur bones (that have been completely mineralized) aren't a fossilzed dinosaur either.This is really nit picking and doesn't matter much. Mummy conveys lots of useful and not untrue information in a short package. It isn't intended to be a careful definition of anything.However, one might now ask: to get skin and such preservation over these time periods do we almost have to have mummification first?