LL,
You evolutionists interpret the evidence one way only, all the time. You dig up a fossil and automatically assume that it is millions of years old because you won't accept any other possibility, i.e. THE WORD OF GOD IN THE BIBLE.
The word of the bible is evidentially vacuous, so damn right I won't accept it. Secondly, I never said it was millions of years old, I just said that there was nothing to tell whether it is 4400 years old or millions of years old. As such it isn't evidence of the biblical flood timeline as you claimed.
Where is your proof that this fossil is millions of years old and that it DIDN'T get formed in the Noachian flood?
You said it was 4400 years old & formed in the flood, so the burden of proof is on you to show it, not me to disprove it.
My point is that a fossilised animal with soft parts preserved isn't therefore evidence of it being recently fossilised.
Mark
There are 10 kinds of people in this world; those that understand binary, & those that don't
™ Version 4.2
