Author
|
Topic: Aquatic Ape theory?
|
SRO2 
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 10 of 138 (98371)
04-07-2004 6:40 AM
|
Reply to: Message 9 by Sylas 04-07-2004 6:24 AM
|
|
Savannahs?
I believe that the latest propsal for the origin of early man in Africa...is that The savannahs weren't the Savannahs at all back then...but a forest.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 9 by Sylas, posted 04-07-2004 6:24 AM | | Sylas has not replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 11 by Denesha, posted 04-07-2004 6:43 AM | | SRO2 has replied |
|
SRO2 
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 12 of 138 (98375)
04-07-2004 6:51 AM
|
Reply to: Message 11 by Denesha 04-07-2004 6:43 AM
|
|
Re: Savannahs?
It's just a correction from my latest understanding on start of early man (Discovery channel)...they are thinking at one time the current savannahs were forests.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 11 by Denesha, posted 04-07-2004 6:43 AM | | Denesha has replied |
Replies to this message: | | Message 13 by Denesha, posted 04-07-2004 7:05 AM | | SRO2 has replied |
|
SRO2 
Inactive Member
|
|
Message 14 of 138 (98379)
04-07-2004 7:08 AM
|
Reply to: Message 13 by Denesha 04-07-2004 7:05 AM
|
|
Re: Savannahs?
Oh, it's not an argument "for" an aquatic ape theory...the fact is I don't buy it myself...it seems to have no basis in reality from the little I've read on it.
This message is a reply to: | | Message 13 by Denesha, posted 04-07-2004 7:05 AM | | Denesha has not replied |
|