Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
5 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,817 Year: 3,074/9,624 Month: 919/1,588 Week: 102/223 Day: 13/17 Hour: 0/1


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   No Evidence Concerning a Quickly Created Grand Canyon Being "All Over The News"
AdminNosy
Administrator
Posts: 4754
From: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Joined: 11-11-2003


Message 16 of 17 (379641)
01-24-2007 10:13 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by chitty
01-24-2007 9:40 PM


focus chitty focus
please stick to the topic here.
You start off well but then start to bring in other things.
If you have a disagreement with dating then go to:
Age Correlations and an Old Earth: Version 1 No 3 (formerly Part III)

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by chitty, posted 01-24-2007 9:40 PM chitty has not replied

  
edge
Member (Idle past 1706 days)
Posts: 4696
From: Colorado, USA
Joined: 01-09-2002


Message 17 of 17 (379644)
01-24-2007 10:20 PM
Reply to: Message 15 by chitty
01-24-2007 9:40 PM


Re: Welcome chitty
I think a sizeable problem for evolutionists is the lack of erosion in the layers deposited in the Grand Canyon. If each layer was exposed to the elements for millions of years, why are there no signs of erosion or chemical weathering?
That's kinda weird, especially since one of the unconformities in the Grand Canyon is call "The Great Unconformity"... How do you explain this?
Instead of the required erosion for the evolutionary model to be true, we find a multitude of layers with no signs of erosion or chemical weathering which extend in a straight line for miles.
This is at odds with many publications. I'll check a few out for you. And what do you call practically all of the Supai Group or the Hermit Shale if not weathered??
This is just the kind of picture you would expect from sediment deposited very quickly by a catastrophic flood. Geologist Dr. Steven Austin, in his book, “Grand Canyon: Monument To Catastrophe,” says,..
Sorry, but Steve Austin, er Stuart Nevins, or whatever he calls himself now, has no credibility here. He is a documented liar.
http://www.talkorigins.org/faqs/icr-visit/bartelt1.html

This message is a reply to:
 Message 15 by chitty, posted 01-24-2007 9:40 PM chitty has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024