Ok, let me try to explain why my message was on topic (more on topic than many of the replies in this thread by the way).
One of the questions the original poster poses is how can you account for cranial differences.
Skin, size, etc are also issues.
Another important thing to consider (which is 100% on topic) is that if you are trying to debunk parts of the old testament you must take into consideration the whole text not just bits that are convenient (such as people's ages that I mentioned).
Further, my question (which pertains to the original question) is, what does the skull of a 950 year old person looks like?
As for the age of turtles,
250 year old turtle
There are also other reports of turtles found the size of cars.
Large turtle
So as a perfect example, we know things used to live longer (reptiles) up until very recently.
So you assume rates stay the same forever but there IS evidence that things used to live longer (turtle evidence 250 + years, recorded evidence humans 950 years). Up until recently.
When a 900 year old human has a child how do you know for certain this child hasn't evolved more than the child of someone who is 20 for example?
I think this is on topic and very relative to the question, especially compared with some of the other replies.
Please explain why you flag mine? Perhaps the questions I bring up are troublesom and the answers may be frightening? The link at the end of my post doesn't bother anyone. Perhaps my questions do.