Cdesign proponentist troll recruiting center

Those who say they are proponents of ID because of science don't really understand science.ID is not science because it can not be tested and verified with measurable results.Plus, if we were Intelligently Designed, well, the body was pretty badly designed. Our teeth rot, we age, we're subjected to disease. It seems to me that an Intelligent Designer would work to eliminate flaws from a body and make it as efficient as possible.And make the world far less hostile to its inhabitants.

Hmmmm...ID follows all the rules of S&M?Nice.Break out the whipped cream.Edit:Here is a more serious question, not for the proponents of ID though since they're so rabid about imposing their will that "it is absolutely science because I say so and anybody else who does not agree is stupid".Would test tube babies and cloning be considered serious evidence for the existence of a generic creator?And what would be testable evidence that there is a creator that real science would accept?Edited by Tram law, : No reason given.