Are Fundamentalists Inherently Immoral

So you propose, instead, to have everyone bound by the "absolute morality" of your particular deity, one of some tens of thousands of such deities invented by mankind throughout recorded history?The fact that there is no empirical evidence for any of them is of no consequence, we're all to be bound by the requirements of your particular deity?Does that about sum it up?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

Sorry, I don't understand your meaning.Try again?

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.

I'll provide a definition. Here's what Heinlein had to say on the subject:

Sin lies only in hurting other people unnecessarily. All other "sins" are invented nonsense. (Hurting yourself is not sinful -- just stupid).

​

Robert A. Heinlein, Time Enough for Love, 1973

​

---

Religious belief does not constitute scientific evidence, nor does it convey scientific knowledge.