The main point of this thread is that all information/codes to date come from a concious mind. To this date.
I alluded to this before, but maybe I wasn't very clear - I don't see how you can make this assertion without assuming the very thing that you're trying to prove - intelligent design is the origin of DNA.
As it stands now, it's incorrect to say that "all information/codes to date come from a conscious mind." The accurate statement is that we have two kinds of codes:
1) codes that are known to come from intelligent minds, like ours.
2) codes that are not known to come from intelligent minds. DNA would be one such code, because at best (for your position) we do not know the origin of DNA; at worst (for your position) we can confidently assert that the origin of DNA is entirely natural and unintelligent.
It is a theory, not a fact. It deserves to be questioned.
Sure. But don't you think it deserved to be questioned honestly?