Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 64 (9164 total)
3 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,784 Year: 4,041/9,624 Month: 912/974 Week: 239/286 Day: 0/46 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   9/11: 8 10th anniversary
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 1 of 63 (523557)
09-11-2009 7:26 AM


Thought I'd start up an anything-to-do with 9/11 thread. That includes a memorial, conspiracy theories, tributes, whether or not the world is safer/more dangerous, causes to why it happened, causes that may mitigate future attacks, etc, etc.
The board is yours.
Edited by AdminModulous, : edited title
Edited by Adminnemooseus, : Change 8th to 10th in topic title.

"Reason obeys itself; and ignorance submits to whatever is dictated to it" -- Thomas Paine

Replies to this message:
 Message 4 by jacortina, posted 09-11-2009 11:06 AM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 8 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 1:29 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 18 by ooh-child, posted 09-11-2009 4:50 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 3 of 63 (523577)
09-11-2009 10:04 AM
Reply to: Message 2 by CosmicChimp
09-11-2009 9:21 AM


You could say the event carries alot of weight in DE.
In what way?

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 2 by CosmicChimp, posted 09-11-2009 9:21 AM CosmicChimp has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 10 by CosmicChimp, posted 09-11-2009 2:53 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 5 of 63 (523598)
09-11-2009 11:23 AM
Reply to: Message 4 by jacortina
09-11-2009 11:06 AM


Re: 9/11: the 8th anniversary (FIX THIS!)
Perhaps you could start by noting that it's NOT the 7th anniversary.
That was a year ago.
And to think all that schooling couldn't help me count. Too bad I can't fix the thread title.
Admins? You reading this? A little help here...

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 4 by jacortina, posted 09-11-2009 11:06 AM jacortina has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 6 by jacortina, posted 09-11-2009 12:04 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 7 of 63 (523610)
09-11-2009 12:25 PM
Reply to: Message 6 by jacortina
09-11-2009 12:04 PM


Re: 9/11: the 8th anniversary
As for any commentary on the subject, I'd simply urge all to do what they can to support the first responders in their locale.
Great suggestion! Since I am a first responder already at work, I'm killing two birds with one stone!

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 6 by jacortina, posted 09-11-2009 12:04 PM jacortina has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 9 of 63 (523622)
09-11-2009 1:57 PM
Reply to: Message 8 by onifre
09-11-2009 1:29 PM


9/11 should be the day that we remind ourself that there are consequences for trying to control the worlds oil industries, and for supporting the illegal occupation of Israel.
9/11 was not due to oil, it was caused by extremists who ideologically disagree with the US. it was due in part, however, because of United State's stance with Israel. Israel, though, was legally given that land by what is known today as the United Nations.
Sadly, lives were lost 8 years ago today due to our governments desire for global domination.
If you mean that the United States desires to be the strongest nation in existance, both economically and militarily, I would agree. If, however, you mean "global domination" by owning every piece of land on the earth for its control, I completely disagree.
Lets not lose sight of the real reason those towers were destroyed. Every action comes with a re-action, which we may not like.
So it is the United State's fault that 9/11 as opposed to Al Qaeda which directed it. I suppose it was Britain's fault that they were bombed by the Luftwaffe.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 8 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 1:29 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 12 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 3:46 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 14 by dronestar, posted 09-11-2009 4:10 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 13 of 63 (523631)
09-11-2009 3:58 PM
Reply to: Message 10 by CosmicChimp
09-11-2009 2:53 PM


Seems to be a hefty amount of interest.
That was one of the biggest events in recent human history. Seems only natural to be interested in it.
Anyhow thanks for clarifying for me.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 10 by CosmicChimp, posted 09-11-2009 2:53 PM CosmicChimp has seen this message but not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 16 of 63 (523636)
09-11-2009 4:42 PM
Reply to: Message 12 by onifre
09-11-2009 3:46 PM


I couldn't have said it better than Rahvin
I would have responded to his post, but they're usually too redundant and extraneous.
The acts themselves, the towers, Pentagon, etc., yes, were caused by, (losely worded) extremists. But no action, especially not one to the degree of 9/11, comes without an inciting cause.
Yes, of course there was a cause as with anything, just not the oft-repeated and ubiquitous plea of "oil." Al Qaeda has an extreme view of Islam. The US is to them the pinnacle of all that is wrong with Western society. They see America as greedy, as salacious, as infidels, as materialistic, as vain, etc. We to them are the representation of all that is wrong with society, including some of your own treasured loves. I'm certain there is some obscure passage in Qu'ran stating how comedians make light of Allah and you therefore should be stoned to death on account of that.
As you can tell by the intended targets, the symbolic message through the physical act was to attack the financial, military, and political system of the United States.
Message received...
The US's strong-hold on the worlds oil supply, which affiliates them with the Saudi Royal family, was one of those inciting causes. Supporting Israel's illegal occupation, was another.
It's not the oil, per se, it's the fact that the United State's was wealthy enough to have that much power over oil. The oil is just one facet of why they don't economically like us. The OVERALL situation is our culture. That is their main focus.
Sure, if you make up your own laws then your actions can be considered legal, by the same people that made the laws up. But when viewed from an outside perspective, one that takes into consideration the people who lived there before Israel invaded and occupied, it was not a legal action.
You do know that there has never ever been a culture known as Palestinians, right? Modern-day Palestinians are largely ethnically Jordanian. In fact, under the Ottoman Empire rule there really were no partitioned countries. It was just a huge area controlled by the Turks, who, believe me, ethnic Middle-Easterns didn't like then or now.
The people that were living there were never kicked out, otherwise there would be no one there to fight with. They were granted access to live there forever. The real issue is that they are taught from day one to hate the Jews, which the Qu'ran spells out in no uncertain terms that they are infectious human waste. They are indoctrinated as little children to hate Jews. It's been that way long before Israel was a State.
Here's some sick shit! Let me know if you see anything resembling this in Israel.
What I'm refering to is Globalization; I'm refering to the global spread of US political ideoligies, religious ideologies and cultural ideologies, with military action.
So you're saying that Al Qaeda attacked the US because of military interventionism? Yeah, I'm really sure they cared that the US went to war with communist Vietnam, communists being another arch-enemy of extremist Muslims.
This sounds more like a Michael Moore soapbox than something rooted in reality.
Weak labor unions: The surplus in cheap labor coupled with an ever growing number of companies in transition has caused a weakening of labor unions in the United States. Unions lose their effectiveness when their membership begins to decline. As a result unions hold less power over corporations that are able to easily replace workers, often for lower wages, and have the option to not offer unionized jobs anymore.
What in God's name does this have to do with the topic? You honestly believe that Al Qaeda attacked the US because of unions??? Hello!?!? Onifre, I'm sure you despise all things American. Fine, I don't really care. But please deal with the facts of this topic and stop splintering off in to a tirade on EVERYTHING you perceive as an affront on the part of the US.
The act itself was due to Al Qaeda, the reason for the attack was due to US foreign policies.
Yes, but that doesn't justify the actions. Your scathing criticism is more aimed at the United States than with the people who used their own scathing criticisms as a justification for the murder of innocent people who have absolutely nothing to do with US foreign policy.
Just imagine, all I have to do is blame "The System" for why I killed an old lady in a park.
Like Rahvin stated, the US didn't deserve it, but that is besides the point. Actions have consequences.
I agree that the US has a bad history of interventionism which leads to what the CIA refers to as, "backlash," but that doesn't mean the US' foreign policy should be completely emasculated or that we should all be made to feel bad if a cat in Yemen gets a splinter in its paw.
I wish that the US would not inject near as much foreign policy as it does, I really do. The problem is that the world is becoming more globalized which means trade and other economic transactions have increased. With those very good things come some bad things.
Al Qaeda doesn't even factor in to that though. They hate that you watch porn and if the chance came would kill you on that basis. Should we blame the entirety of the porn industry because you liked watching porn? Is it "porn's" fault that Al Qaeda killed you or is it Al Qaeda's fault.
Put in to perspective.
Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.
Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 12 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 3:46 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 17 by Rahvin, posted 09-11-2009 4:45 PM Hyroglyphx has not replied
 Message 23 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 6:35 PM Hyroglyphx has replied
 Message 37 by dronestar, posted 09-14-2009 12:00 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 19 of 63 (523639)
09-11-2009 4:59 PM
Reply to: Message 18 by ooh-child
09-11-2009 4:50 PM


Re: Could we have avoided it?
I think it could be argued that if Dubya had heeded Clinton's warning about Bin Laden, and paid some attention to the PDB warning of attacks, 9/11 could have been less devastating - if not avoided all together.
Psh... They both play a role. Clinton did way too little and Bush did way too much.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 18 by ooh-child, posted 09-11-2009 4:50 PM ooh-child has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 20 by ooh-child, posted 09-11-2009 5:05 PM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 21 of 63 (523644)
09-11-2009 5:21 PM
Reply to: Message 20 by ooh-child
09-11-2009 5:05 PM


Re: Could we have avoided it?
True, but who knows how Clinton would have reacted to the August 2001 PDB?
Clinton was incessantly harangued right after 9/11 for what he didn't do, as it was rumored that some years after the first Trade Center attack, that bin Laden was in a special operator's crosshairs but he ultimately called it off.
Clinton never did an interview with FOX (for rather obvious reasons) until it became politically necessary to respond to the allegations that he didn't do enough.
He took this interview knowing that he was going to respond vociferously, which bolstered the DNC and threw mud in the face of the GOP.
You need to remember that the US was attacked SEVEN times by bin Laden PRIOR to 9/11, and 5 of those times under Clinton. The extent of what he accomplished was sending a cruise missile in to an Asprin factory.
Bush was a dumbass and a war-mongerer far too prone to military intervention while Clinton was a draft-dodging hippy who is more in love with himself than with his country.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 20 by ooh-child, posted 09-11-2009 5:05 PM ooh-child has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 26 of 63 (523740)
09-12-2009 10:00 AM
Reply to: Message 23 by onifre
09-11-2009 6:35 PM


Ain't that the pot calling the kettle black
I always wondered what Al Qaeda's view of Canada or Switzerland is? Ever wonder that?
No, but only because I know the answer. Al Qaeda hates anything that does not conform to their extremely narrow views. They've beheaded anything that gets in their path. They've beheaded Japanese, Italian Filipino peace workers who were feeding Iraq's poor, so that they could use it as a propaganda tool to strike fear in the hearts of millions. They've bombed the Spanish for the same reason.
They set their sight's on the US because it is the ultimate representation of their fury against all Western philosophy and culture.
This is media driven bullshit. Bin Laden explained exactly why he attacked us, none of it has to do with our culture. But don't listen to him and listen to media propaganda, maybe the next building they bring down will help you understand.
Who is listening to media propaganda, not that you'd know whether or not its was propaganda or truth?
You do know that there was never a country named Israel, right?
There exists overwhelming archaeological evidence pointing to the opposite.
quote:
The real issue is that they are taught from day one to hate the Jews, which the Qu'ran spells out in no uncertain terms that they are infectious human waste. They are indoctrinated as little children to hate Jews. It's been that way long before Israel was a State.
More media driven propaganda. Complete bullshit.
Media driven propaganda, yes, but from whom?
Did you read the link? Do you understand what globalization is?
The term "globalization" is extremely broad and in no way should assume negative connotations. You're going to have to be specific.
I'm despising one thing American right now. You, and the spin that you've put on what I've said.
The only spin here is the one you've put on this, where you've painted a false and distorted picture of how everything works.
Honestly dude, you need to re-read my post and try to understand it better and stop acting like a punk about it. You've clearly not understood my position so it would be better, if you care to debate this, if you did understand it before running off into your own little tirades.
Your argument in a nutshell: America is wrong, Al Qaeda is sort of wrong, but not as bad as America. The overwhelming trend you are exhibiting is that you mostly blame the United States for 9/11. Is that not true? Is this a spin?
The evidence of this is in your posts and how you managed smuggle in unions and other irrelevancies through the backdoor when speaking about 9/11.
When you're ready stop giving me the FoxNews babble let me know, and we can continue talking about this. Till then, save the O'Reilly speech for someone who cares to hear that bias garbage.
You assume that I'm taking cues from conservative talking points and pundits because I'm not nearly as liberal as you are. I am neither conservative nor liberal, as I feel my political beliefs are too nuanced to categorically side with either one 100% of the time.
You aren't saying anything other than typical liberal sound bites, yet you are calling me biased because, even though I don't agree with much of Bush's foreign policies, I place the brunt of the blame on Al Qaeda for what Al Qaeda did as opposed to the blame shifting you are doing.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 23 by onifre, posted 09-11-2009 6:35 PM onifre has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 28 by onifre, posted 09-12-2009 11:08 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 27 of 63 (523741)
09-12-2009 10:05 AM
Reply to: Message 25 by Percy
09-12-2009 8:36 AM


Re: The Rebuilding Effort
Great post, Percy! Thanks for sharing that with all of us.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 25 by Percy, posted 09-12-2009 8:36 AM Percy has seen this message but not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 29 of 63 (523896)
09-13-2009 8:44 AM
Reply to: Message 28 by onifre
09-12-2009 11:08 AM


Re: you had me at "pot"
ALL fundamentalist hate anything what doesn't conform to their extremely narrow views.
Maybe, but not all of them chop your head off or slam 747's in to buildings at 500 mph.
How clearer did Bin Laden have to be?
Bin Laden was clear that he hates America and hates Israel. From what I can gather, his issues with America seem to be shared by you. Maybe he's not a terrorist after all. Maybe he's just a freedom fighter? Either way it all has a RobinHood-esque feel to it, and he's not a stupid man. He's smart enough to figure out how to play off of America's division to seek his own end.
Not listening to his reasons and creating this illusional reason is going to lead to an eventual repeat of that tragic event.
Or maybe that it is his own brand of propaganda. Did you ever consider that he's spreading disinformation intentionally to foster some support here? The more he causes division here, the more his goals can be achieved. It's classic psychological warfare.
Man, how could we have avoided that...? Oh yea, by not going into Iraq!... You're a pro-gun dude, how would you react if they invaded us?
Oni, wake up and get onboard the reality train. WE invaded them and attacked them first, right? That's what you're saying? Try again. These Islamic extremists have attacked the United States and US assets around the world for decades, without the US doing anything in retaliation. Let me count the ways for you: The Berlin discotheque bombing, Pan Am Flight 103, First World Trade Center bombing, the Khobar Towers, both the embassy bombings in Tanzania and Kenya, the USS Cole, and finally 9/11 being the straw that breaks the camels back.
This doesn't include a huge list of failed or foiled attempts, like the Richard Reid shoebombing, the New York City bomb plot, the 1993 NYC landmark bombing plot, etc, nor does it go over the atrocities faced by our neighbors and allies who have also unjustly suffered the wrath of extremist Islamicists.
Yet you sit here and have the audacity, the sheer temerity to say that if we didn't invade Iraq, maybe none of this would have happened???
Thousands of people have been killed and tens of thousands more injured over several DECADES where the US has been a target. The United States treated it as criminal cases and did nothing militarily until it became painfully clear that this has now gotten to the point that if the US and her allies don't capture or kill them on their own soil, that they will continue coming here. That fact is made evident by the clear historical trend that has never stopped.
Bin Laden gave his reasons for doing it, show me the evidence that our culture and Western philosophy is one of them. If not, then admit you got that from some news source and Bin Laden never said it.
Yes they're from news sources, but come from his own mouth. The burden of proof then comes on you to prove that reputable news agencies worldwide, even Muslim news agencies, are all conspiring to lie.
I'm not painting a picture, I'm telling you what Bin Laden said were his reasons for attacking. You're the one saying it's for other reasons, but Bin Laden doesn't mention the reasons you give.
It's clear that he hates what America is, its value system, its apostate condition, its greed, its political stance with Israel, its interventionism, all of which I said and all of which he spells out in his own speech. I never said any of that, huh? That's funny because in my first post I stated all of that.
You are thinking too narrowly, as if Haliburton and Bush are the real reasons. Obviously not since this predates all of that.
Let me make it clear, Mr. O'Reilly, so that you can understand me better. I'm not blaming the US for the attacks, I'm saying to realize the reasons why we were attacked - THE REAL REASONS- so that tragic events like 9/11 can be avoided in the future. But not understanding the real reasons for the attacks will only lead to further attacks.
So what is your solution, now that Obama is in the White House and still hasn't stopped Bush's Iraq War? What must America be that you honestly think that bin Laden is just going to go away and never shed blood again, even though the Qu'ran is explicit on what should happen to infidels?
I'll tell you what America must be to satisfy them. America has to be just like them. Anything less is unacceptable.
This is apparently what you fail to understand about him. He will always have some sort of complaint, and if not him, the next in line. This all started before Bush 2, Clinton, Bush 1, Reagan, Carter and there is no sign of it slowing down until we assimilate in to the way they envision their theocratic world should be like.
Again I'll try to explain it because you're wrong. I blame Al Qaeda as well. You see, we agree. BUT, like I said before, this is about the reasons why they attacked. You said it's because of our culture, but it's not. Bin Laden is clear as to why he did it, and it has nothing to do with our culture.
Yes it is. At the end of the day he hates everything about America, which includes all of what you wrote about, but is inclusive to so much more. What I am trying to dispel is the notion that if we just leave Iraq and Afghanistan, all will some how be better. But history tells otherwise as the terrorist attacks all precede these wars and conflicts.
At the end of the day, you have to read from his ultimate source, which he takes cues from, namely, the Qu'ran. America is the antithesis of what the Qu'ran spells out. We're apostates and infidels who must stop infecting the world.
What you hear from bin Laden are temporary goals. Look at the bigger picture and the end-game solution for these individuals.
US foreign policy, if not changed, will eventually lead to a repeat of 9/11. It has nothing to do with our culture.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 28 by onifre, posted 09-12-2009 11:08 AM onifre has not replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 30 by cavediver, posted 09-13-2009 9:10 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 31 of 63 (523908)
09-13-2009 9:15 AM
Reply to: Message 30 by cavediver
09-13-2009 9:10 AM


Re: you had me at "pot"
Not that Onifre needs any help with this, but could you explain just when Iraq did any of these things???
I don't think the Iraq War was justifiable, so the insinuations can end here. I'm simply pointing out that terror groups started long before this time.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 30 by cavediver, posted 09-13-2009 9:10 AM cavediver has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 32 by cavediver, posted 09-13-2009 10:13 AM Hyroglyphx has replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 33 of 63 (523925)
09-13-2009 10:31 AM
Reply to: Message 32 by cavediver
09-13-2009 10:13 AM


Re: you had me at "pot"
What insinuations? Oni mentions invading Iraq, and you retort with Al-Qaeda operations.
If you follow the dialogue and the topic of discussion, we are talking about 9/11 and Al Qaeda which predates the Iraq War.
I simply ask why, when it is such obvious Bush administration bullshit. Wouldn't have thought you'd fall for that.
Do you mind staying on topic since all three of us condemn the Iraq war?
Err, I think that could have something to do with US foreign policy perhaps predating our invasions of Iraq/Afghanistan. To be fair, you yanks are still rank amateurs at this. It will be a while before you can attain the masterful levels of shit-stirring us Brits perfected over a century ago.
Congratulations, give the SAS my full regard.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 32 by cavediver, posted 09-13-2009 10:13 AM cavediver has not replied

  
Hyroglyphx
Inactive Member


Message 35 of 63 (523930)
09-13-2009 11:50 AM
Reply to: Message 34 by Modulous
09-13-2009 11:38 AM


Agreed. Playing the 'we invaded them, no they started terrorist attacks before we invaded them' game just takes us back further and further.
Imagine applying that rationale to WWII. Allied Forces in WWII should have never sent in the Royal or US Air Force in to Germany. I suppose they should have waited for more Blitzkrieg attacks by the Luftwaffe.
What exactly would you agree with, strategically speaking? Because as history will agree, 7, 8, 9 attacks with no kind of retaliation except an embarrassing incident where a cruise missile was sent in to an asprin factory.
So what kind of strategy would you suggest, if not an offensive strategy?
Edited by Hyroglyphx, : No reason given.

"The Constitution shall never be construed to prevent the people of the United States who are peaceable citizens from keeping their own arms." - Samual Adams

This message is a reply to:
 Message 34 by Modulous, posted 09-13-2009 11:38 AM Modulous has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 36 by Modulous, posted 09-14-2009 1:43 AM Hyroglyphx has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024