Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 65 (9162 total)
2 online now:
Newest Member: popoi
Post Volume: Total: 915,806 Year: 3,063/9,624 Month: 908/1,588 Week: 91/223 Day: 2/17 Hour: 0/0


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   TOE and the Reasons for Doubt
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3441 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 185 of 530 (528046)
10-04-2009 4:33 AM


Gday all,
I don't think Peg ever answered this -
Do you really think Carl Sagan supports design, rather than evolution, Peg?
K.
Edited by Kapyong, : Minor addition

Replies to this message:
 Message 195 by Peg, posted 10-05-2009 4:37 AM Kapyong has replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3441 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


(1)
Message 227 of 530 (528306)
10-05-2009 5:50 PM
Reply to: Message 195 by Peg
10-05-2009 4:37 AM


Gday,
Peg writes:
i have already seen the error of my way over this point and have apologised. I know Sagan is an evolutionist and not a believer in creation.
Great.
Peg writes:
The quotes i used in msg 13 were to show that scientists findings are not also pointing only to evolution. When i used his quote i should have specified why i was using it.
But you were completely wrong.
They did not say that at all.
Peg writes:
he did say that nature gives the 'appearance of design'
*sigh*
No, he didn't.
You just repeated the EXACT error you admitted you were wrong about.
Incredible.
Sagan's paragraph clearly says the opposite.
Sadly, Peg, you just can't comprehend English.
K.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 195 by Peg, posted 10-05-2009 4:37 AM Peg has not replied

  
Kapyong
Member (Idle past 3441 days)
Posts: 344
Joined: 05-22-2003


Message 329 of 530 (529505)
10-09-2009 4:45 PM
Reply to: Message 321 by Calypsis4
10-09-2009 9:35 AM


Re: Some facts that you may not be aware of
Gday,
In case you haven't noticed, I have given a couple hundred pieces of evidence in the last ten days. But it seems that skepics like you just arbitrarily brush aside anything that goes against your philosophical presuppositions as if none of it counts.
It's not evidence against evolution at all.
As you have been told dozens of times.
But you just don't listen.
K.

This message is a reply to:
 Message 321 by Calypsis4, posted 10-09-2009 9:35 AM Calypsis4 has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 330 by Calypsis4, posted 10-09-2009 5:45 PM Kapyong has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024