See previous post. I wasn't trying to imply anything, just thinking that conclusions were being drawn rather quickly
Something like: abnormal limb ratio+5claws instead of 2 = Transitional fossil = Evolution is true.
I see no sign of that here or elsewhere.
What we see is a century and some of gathering data and finding that it overwhelmingly supports the ToE. Then we have someone suggesting some tiny, wee, small detail is an "atom bomb" refuting it all.
What is being pointed out is that the specimen is exactly the kind of thing that the ToE leads us to expect and there is nothing about it that is evidence
against evolutionary biolgy. It doesn't "prove" anything it is simple one of what is now millions of details which
support the theories.
™ Version 4.2
(1)
