Do the religious want scientific enquiry to end?

Just as saying that if someone had fed my body through a woodchipper I wouldn't still be alive is "NOT evidence nor a discovery but wishful thinking".Y'know, archaeologist, when you have to abolish the scientific method in order to cling to your delusions, that's a sign that you're wrong. I bet if that was coherent it would be untrue. Perhaps you should try to find out how genetic bottlenecks are actually identified. Here's a hint: it has nothing to do with "old bodies/skeletons" and a lot more to do with equilibrium heterozygosity. Excuse me, have you ever looked at the immense amount of trivia that is included in your own holy book?There's a whole book of the Bible about some guy suffering from painful boils. One's heart goes out to him, but surely there have been more significant historical events. And yet in the course of your brief but entertaining stay on these forums it is you who have tended to be hopelessly, ridiculously wrong about pretty much everything.By the way, are you ever going to produce that evidence that ancient Minoans had microscopes?So I think the possibility that you are deceiving yourself is markedly more likely.

If you know what you meant by that crazy jumble of words, would you mind explaining it to the rest of us?I think that you are still making stupid and inaccurate guesses as to how scientists detect a genetic bottleneck; but the incoherence of your thoughts is obscured by the incoherence of your mode of expression. Yes. You are trying to discount failed predictions as evidence against a hypothesis. Like you, I can't think of a single one. Your point and its relevance are cryptic and obscure.Perhaps I should explain to you that finding out what would happen if "if the population is very large and random mating is taking place" is not the same as assuming that this is always the case.But if that was the sort of thing you were capable of understanding, you wouldn't post such a large quantity of garbage. You do not explain how if "all the grandchildren of noah and then his sons only had each other to marry" this would "throw off" all modern scientific ideas.But if you know what crazy ideas are fulminating in your brain, perhaps you would explain it to the rest of us?Back in the real world, the population bottleneck is exactly the sort of thing one could detect by genetic analysis --- if it had taken place.Edited by Dr Adequate, : No reason given.

Again, one supposes that that was intended to mean something. I gather that you believe that you have "shown" something other than ignorance and petulance.But despite my requests you are apparently unable or unwilling to say what.