Register | Sign In


Understanding through Discussion


EvC Forum active members: 66 (9164 total)
8 online now:
Newest Member: ChatGPT
Post Volume: Total: 916,461 Year: 3,718/9,624 Month: 589/974 Week: 202/276 Day: 42/34 Hour: 5/2


Thread  Details

Email This Thread
Newer Topic | Older Topic
  
Author Topic:   Do the religious want scientific enquiry to end?
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 94 of 111 (575372)
08-19-2010 6:07 PM
Reply to: Message 81 by archaeologist
08-19-2010 4:23 AM


Now i am thinking of the pakistani flood that has taken place recently. this is a good example of why Noah's flood was global and did take place. NO ONE puts a destructive local flood into their identity, religious works, or makes it a life changing event. Katrina is another example, the flooding there did not do anything to change america's identity, nor did they incorporate it as a major historical event that changed their civilization or made them put it into their religious writings.
The point is what the individuals who came up with the global flood myth thought. Any flood covering a major portion of Mesopotamia would be assumed by these ignorant humans, ignorant meaning uninformed,
as covering the entire earth. Stop trying to read mythology through 21st century eyes and trying reading it through the eyes of the story tellers.
Edited by bluescat48, : missing verb

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 81 by archaeologist, posted 08-19-2010 4:23 AM archaeologist has not replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 99 of 111 (576728)
08-25-2010 11:58 AM
Reply to: Message 96 by archaeologist
08-25-2010 5:52 AM


wrong again and that answer is based upon assumption coupled with emotionalism and bias not fact nor evidence.
Which is exactly what your beliefs are. That is all any of your posts show, assumptions coupled with emotionalism and bias not fact or evidence. The evidence from numerous sources shows that there was no global flood ~4500 years ago. Biological, Geological, Physical and Chemical evidence shows there was no flood. None is total by itself, but when coupled together the evidence for the global flood is that there was not one.

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 96 by archaeologist, posted 08-25-2010 5:52 AM archaeologist has replied

Replies to this message:
 Message 102 by archaeologist, posted 08-30-2010 4:48 AM bluescat48 has replied

  
bluescat48
Member (Idle past 4211 days)
Posts: 2347
From: United States
Joined: 10-06-2007


Message 104 of 111 (577789)
08-30-2010 12:04 PM
Reply to: Message 102 by archaeologist
08-30-2010 4:48 AM


I don't have to supply any more evidence than what has already been put forth in this and other related topics. I will state 2 of these.
No genetic bottleneck 4500 or at any other period in modern man's history ~10000 years.
No evidence that a global flood occurred at this or any other time from geological evidence. Whether supernatural or not, it will leave physical evidence or else as Huntard states, your god is a deceiver.
Edited by bluescat48, : missing word

There is no better love between 2 people than mutual respect for each other WT Young, 2002
Who gave anyone the authority to call me an authority on anything. WT Young, 1969
Since Evolution is only ~90% correct it should be thrown out and replaced by Creation which has even a lower % of correctness. W T Young, 2008

This message is a reply to:
 Message 102 by archaeologist, posted 08-30-2010 4:48 AM archaeologist has not replied

  
Newer Topic | Older Topic
Jump to:


Copyright 2001-2023 by EvC Forum, All Rights Reserved

™ Version 4.2
Innovative software from Qwixotic © 2024