But the foretelling of the lunar eclipse was prophesied (Joel 2:31) and it occurred as he said it would as verified by Peter who was an eyewitness (Acts 2:20).
But lunar eclipses happen. Prophesising one will is not impressive. And the one in 33AD wasn't the one that Joel prophesied because he was talking about a full lunar eclipse.
Then why bother replying on this point? Why not regard those witnesses as corroborating evidence as it should be?
Because they aren't corroborating witnesses to the crucifixion of Christ. As long as we're clear that they are corroborating something else we're in agreement.
It was enough of an eclipse that people in Israel saw it.
I think you just made that up. If any body in Israel did see it - I don't see you presenting evidence that they recorded it.
Israel was right at the very penumbra (that's your source, by the way). And they would not have seen the moon turn red.
Again, it was a supernatural event.
No - the lunar eclipse that the nasa website shows and that you cited as evidence was a natural event. It was calculated to have occurred using physics. If you want to propose that the moon turned red as a supernatural event but that doesn't tell us anything useful.
Leaving Almighty God out of the equation is always the great fault of skeptics like you.
You cited scientific evidence which left YHWH out of the equation. I showed how the scientific evidence you cited doesn't corroborate your prophecy. So - leaving YHWH out of the equation by appealing to science was your doing so was your fault.
If you want to say, "Jesus died on the cross and my evidence is that God could do that" - then go right ahead, I won't stop you.
But those of us who have seen his power know what He can do.
Aye, if that's what you want to believe, then go right ahead. It is not really something that is worth debating in this thread.
When Christ returns to earth 'every eye shall see him' no matter from what location on earth that coming is viewed by human eyes.
Really? Oh, right then, then their must have been a lunar eclipse visible from the middle east in 33AD that turned the moon red and this is the event that Joel was talking about. Obviously. /sarcasm
Sorry - what did you expect?
You are the one who will be sorry. You missed the significance of the life and death of the most important person who ever lived on this planet. That's really too bad.
I said sorry and you told me that I was the one who will be sorry? Your reading comprehension slipped up a bit there methinks.
By the way, the prophecy of Daniel foretelling the exact time of Christ's death is not vague. You just don't care enough to find out how accurate he really was.
Then teach, don't bloviate and proselytize.